Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Dont know if its still around, but steve used to have a plaque from world war two, hanging in apple HQ, which read;

Loose Lips Sink Ships

I think this could be particularly applicable to the rumors regarding a flash based iPod, because if people become aware of a cheaper iPod, it could realy hurt the more expensive iPod's pre-christmas sales.
 
I wonder if Microsoft goes after individuals that post the exciting new stuff from Microsoft labs? I can hardly wait for the keynote from Bill Gates at the next WinWorld in Seattle. 2 hrs of speaking using words like 'innovation' and 'licensing' and 'rich client' or 'richer experience'.
:p
 
Stella said:
The RIAA sue anonymous people too don't they - John Dose (Spelling)

John Doe or Jane Doe. Depends on Gender.

And this is pretty cool. Apple is putting shame to the code name "LAW"

:D

Anyone know what that means? Carl Segan maybe?
 
woodsey said:
it could realy hurt the more expensive iPod's pre-christmas sales.

Yeah, in light of the rumor of a flash-based iPod being around for weeks, the iPods are just not selling very well this Christmas... ;)
 
Timing, music interface?

My theory is this isn't about the flash iPod, but the music interface thing that popped up a couple weeks back. The info and drawings were very detailed, and so consistent they seemed to have one source. The flash iPod stuff is bits and pieces from all over, not to mention a logical product addition that shouldn't surprise anyone. Same with the rumored 5GB iPod mini. But the music interface is somewhat out of left field, and as I said, specific.

The timing I think is related to the upcoming expo. Apple may have some big things coming that haven't leaked yet, and this is a first strike to try to keep the lid on things - both those already in the know, and those running rumor sites. Don't want anyone hearing about that quad-G5 Newton, or the Lisa II Portable...
 
Edot said:
Isn't Apple shooting themselves in the foot? If they just ignored the "leaked" information then the public and other companies would remain skeptical, and not really know what Apple is doing. Now they have pretty much confirmed that whatever was "leaked" was real, and they want to know who is responsible. I don't understand it. At least sue after the actual product has been released.

I absolutely agree. By ignoring leaked information you leave it all to speculation. Plus, an unnamed defendant(s) lawsuit is pretty pointless. Or maybe they filed it to mislead competitors. Maybe there is no flash iPod, or Sirius deal, and they have something way better in store. Maybe they just want the competition to start doing very expensive R&D for nothing. Now that would be smart. :cool:
 
with regard to letting it go as a rumor, there might be more to this than we know. i'm sure the apple legal folks must have thought about, especially with their farmilarity with the rumor community. i think there is more that we don't know quite yet. it'll probably come on in the next weeks...
 
"Apple has filed a civil complaint against unnamed individuals who we believe stole our trade secrets and posted detailed information about an unannounced Apple product on the Internet,"

Where's the detailed information?
 
woodsey said:
I think this could be particularly applicable to the rumors regarding a flash based iPod, because if people become aware of a cheaper iPod, it could realy hurt the more expensive iPod's pre-christmas sales.
Yeah, it's not like there were loads of news stories about iPod shortages this Christmas season, and experts are estimating they could sell something like 4 million iPods this quarter. No, wait, they are.

Even Apple is only saying that they're worried about competitors getting advanced notice of what to copy, not that the foreknowledge is going to hurt sales of existing products, and I'd tend to believe that.

Though Apple obviously would rather you happily went out and bought a PowerBook now rather than waiting for January, rumored specs of a PowerBook upgrade are not the same as industrial espionage.

I like bignumbers' media center theory, since the other options don't seem to line up with the lawsuit:

The Motorola-Apple iPhone thing has been in the works for a while including public announcement of some sort of partnership, and the only information I've seen has come directly from Apple officials. Besides, there hasn't been anything at all specific making the rumor rounds.

The flash iPod thing also seems suspect, since there have been rumors floating around for months, and aren't exactly easily tracible back to a single source. Info has also come from Toshiba and been published in major news outlets. Unless those interface-less renderings based on "leaked" descriptions few days ago prove to be correct, though even then I'm not sure Apple would bother with that big of a deal about it since it's been talked about so much.

The media thing, though, was low-profile and a big enough leap in product strategy that Apple might well get angry about it leaking, particularly if they've been keeping the research tightly under wraps (compared to a Flash iPod, which is supposed to already be in production and a pretty obvious product expansion into an existing marketspace).
 
iPod photo retribution

Makosuke said:
based on the wording in that story it'd be possible that they're suing over a past infraction, and that the product was unreleased at the time but now available

iPod photo rumors were right on the ball, so it seems... it could be retribution time for that? But then again, speculation of a cheaper iPod could be the ticket, too...
 
bignumbers said:
My theory is this isn't about the flash iPod, but the music interface thing that popped up a couple weeks back. The info and drawings were very detailed, and so consistent they seemed to have one source. The flash iPod stuff is bits and pieces from all over, not to mention a logical product addition that shouldn't surprise anyone. Same with the rumored 5GB iPod mini. But the music interface is somewhat out of left field, and as I said, specific.

I assume you're referring to this? This does seem to be the most logical candidate for the lawsuit to me considering the text of the legal complaint. But we're all guessing I suppose at this juncture. Besides, wouldn't Apple legal have already requested that this be taken down if it were so sensitive?
 
They definitly mean business, but then again, MWSF brings alot of media attention, and if something leaked they could lose alot of media attention and money
 
woodsey said:
I think this could be particularly applicable to the rumors regarding a flash based iPod, because if people become aware of a cheaper iPod, it could realy hurt the more expensive iPod's pre-christmas sales.

Eh? They still have ipods around?
The report I saw said there were almost no ipods in the channel at all.
 
and this article is on the first page because?

Apple needs to get a grip, its a freackin rumor. I guess since they have a civil case, its true.
 
Macmaniac said:
IMHO it seems like this could be related to the Siruis-Apple player. It has never been talked about before this week, and the suit came this week. All the other rumors are known, so I think its gotta be satellite radio.

Nah, it's for the Sirius-iPod-iPhone. Now that would be something interesting, I might even be willing to buy one of those. I've been considering buying a satellite radio receiver recently...hmm.

:cool:
 
It could be something over the iPod mini, the iMac G5, or some of the software Apple's released -- doesn't have to be a civil action over something that hasn't been released yet.

Would be bad form to do that, and not to send a note from Apple legal to the sites currently showing the leaks info.

Anyway, weren't there some rumors of "Apple Legal made me remove..." in the past 6 months -- don't remember any Apple leak plugging recently.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.