m a y a said:
When you place you hard earned dollars in R&D would you revel what it is to everyone. I think not some information as you have stated is already given by companies that are involved as per Moto, IBM, Toshiba, Hitachi, etc...
Look at the clues.
Anyway, is it so bad that people now know that a different kind of iPod is being released? It's not like it's something revolutionary, IMHO. The iPod photo was even more different from the 4G (from a feature standpoint) than an iPod flash will be. We are talking about *storage media* and its form factor, not features! The competition: "Look, Apple is releasing a flash player! Let's make an iPod flash rip-off!"
Seriously, is this a big deal? Flash player manufacturers have had a lot of time to copy the iPod (in fact, some did, like the D-Cube, which is an aesthetical rip-off of the 1G iPod, but with a crappy interface and full plastic case). Apple doesn't lose anything by having their competitors know that an iPod flash is in the works. However, they might lose *sales*: Some people don't even need the 4GB of storage of the mini [yet], and would rather buy an iPod flash instead if it was already avaliable. They don't want anyone to know that an iPod flash is going to be released, for the same reason they don't want customers to know that the iPod mini will be bumped to a 5GB drive, not because of their competition
And what if there is no iPod flash, but an iPhone-thingy instead? Big deal! There are phones with mp3 playback already... Are they as cool and popular as the iPod? Doesn't seem so... Can a Apple/Motorola be as cool as an iPod? MAYBE. So, again, no problem here. They would even gain MORE if they (Apple) revealed that iPhone thing. Some people would keep from buying a cell phone this christmas, and wait for that "thing" to be released
[edit:]
Just a few more thoughts: I do understand the point of some people here that think Apple's reasons to sue are the exact opposite. It may be true that they are running out of iPods anyway, however, maybe because not all future iPod owners check on rumour sites like we do. But I still think those "60 days" may or may not be enough for some company to steal Apple's thunder, hugely depending on the company. And in some other cases, even if Apple has a ONE year lead, some other schizo weirdo monopolistic companies like Micro$oft will still think they're leading the pack. Just look at Bill Gates sayin' that they invented personal computing, and advanced desktop search and all...
I mean, Apple is getting some huge press on the iMac G5 and the iPod, even though the first still has a measly 256MB of RAM and an outdated graphics card, and the latter doesn't support line in stereo recording and is only compatible with iTMS, doesn't support all the formats avaliable there, etc etc etc... What seems to be big, these days, is not being the "first", but the "best" or, in Apple's case, the most "cool" and "balanced".