Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I just had to read though the comments to see how many far leftists would think creating 3,000 new jobs is a terrible thing. I suppose you if you want to keep people unemployed and living off of Government welfare it's a bad thing.

Foxconn is receiving $3 Billion in direct government handouts with probably a lot more giveaways. For 3000 jobs. Welfare to ordinary people is a tiny fraction of corporate welfare. If corps paid their fair share of taxes and paid workers decently, there would be no need for welfare.
 
I once worked for an IT consulting firm back in 2000/2001. I was contracted at a software company in Minneapolis at the time, and they decided to outsource all of their development staff to a company in India. With the exception of the local manager, all the local dev staff were laid off within three months (one fiscal quarter), once the transition to the India staff was completed. My contract ended two months later, and was not renewed by the company.

This is a good first step, but there also needs to be some progress done to reverse all of that other outsourcing that has been done as well.

Regarding the long term impacts of this move ... time will tell. Right now, I'm sorta neutral on wether it will be a long term success or not.
 
Last edited:
LOL.

D0xmklg.png
Now there you go bringing in facts to refute alternative facts.
 
You really should stop now because you are so far behind reality that you are making yourself look foolish. As for manufacturing in the USA where do you think the computer industry got its start. The whole industry is pretty much a development of the USA. Companies like HP, Apple and a whole host of others are what gave the Silicon Valley its name.
You mean it wasn't the plums, grapes, and apricots that did it?
 
There’s a big difference between can and will. At the end of the day younger Americans just aren’t particularly interested in being farmers, miners, or factory workers, and the ones that are likely don’t understand that this isn’t like a job in an older type of factory. They will need certain skill sets that aren’t a priority in certain parts of the country.
One of my favorite Terry Gou quotes is "Hungry people have clear minds." The USA is the world's third most populous nation, and the notion that we can all sit around at Starbucks and play video games because we are an "advanced" economy is naïve. For our own good we need significant numbers of people working in agriculture, extractive industries, and yes, manufacturing. It will grow the tax base and provide work for the millions of Americans projected to enter the workforce each year.
 
How hard is that to understand? I’m really struggling to understand if you guys are serious or not, sometimes.

I’m trying to not be rude, but I also feel like I’m educating about the most basic things.

YES!

They are an American-based company (Whose headquarters are in Cupertino, California, where Cook spends most of his time, the CEO of the company, no big deal) that has a global reach because everyone wants their products, everyone, everywhere, and they make their stuff in China.

Ever heard of Coca Cola? Same deal, (Maybe minus make stuff in China)

There is nothing contradictory about stating the facts.
You clearly have very little theoretical basis in the legal basis of MNCs (Multi-National Corporations). Why do you think Facebook is based out of Ireland or Apple does the same for their $100+ billion corporate profits parked there?

This probably explains why you think an oompla loompa had anything to do with this Foxconn deal or the previous one with Carrier. This is all spin and he is no different than any other smiley-faced glad hand other than his general disdain for the rule of law.
 
These won’t be $15/hr. jobs. Just more of the same. These types of jobs already exist. There is actually a surplus of them. Want one? Go get one.

How on earth do you know this? The factory has not even been built yet. If you get enough surplus jobs you darn right the pay offered goes up. This is exactly the thinking that is going to keep the Democratic party in the minority for a long time.
 
You clearly have very little theoretical basis in the legal basis of MNCs (Multi-National Corporations). Why do you think Facebook is based out of Ireland or Apple does the same for their $100+ billion corporate profits parked there?

This probably explains why you think an oompla loompa had anything to do with this Foxconn deal or the previous one with Carrier. This is all spin and he is no different than any other smiley-faced glad hand other than his general disdain for the rule of law.


http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/26/politics/trump-rule-of-law/index.html

Stole the words from CNN’s mouth: “trump’s disdain for rule of law” as article title :D posted 12h ago

And my response is: ok



You had me at Oompa Loompa. This is a skin deep, rather superficial observation to validate your anti-POTUS bias
 
Last edited:
Will be completed by 2020.

So at the end of his first term. And people are still wanting to ‘rationally’ (Really emotionally) argue self-made RUMORS that this is/could be a Obama policy spillover/there were chatters about this in the Obama admin.

Doesn’t get more deluded than that imo
Mmmm. Irony...
 
Just a question - how many jobs are anticipated to remain long-term from Tesla?
From what I have read, Musk is hoping to make the line 100% automated.

I'm not in the US so I don't have a direct stake in any outcome here (though I am an Apple shareholder), however I would be concerned that this is simply a temporary job-creation. Apple (like other companies) has been pushing hard for maximal automation through robotics. I wonder if those jobs that remain will be predominantly in robotic engineering and maintenance.

Seems to me that a better idea would be to begin by allowing repatriation of foreign holdings at a low tax rate, then marginally increase the import tax. Then take this money and use it to support those whose jobs were eliminated while educating the younger workers so they can be the ones to maintain and advance the machinery. Historically, societies tend to fall apart when the separation between haves and have-nots becomes too large.

Full disclosure - politically, I lean right on certain issues, and left on others; as someone who is considered a high-income individual in my country (though my bank account doesn't support this....), I actually favour higher taxes on personal income but lower taxes on corporations. I have seen some evidence that this results in a lower discrepancy between the highest and lowest incomes in a company, and results in more money being kept in the company for re-investment and job creation. Having said that, if there is a better way to do things, I am open to being educated.

[Please don't respond just to tell me I'm wrong - I am happy to have an educational and informative discussion but nobody has time for ad hominem attacks and/or other time-wasting - thanks]
 
One of my favorite Terry Gou quotes is "Hungry people have clear minds." The USA is the world's third most populous nation, and the notion that we can all sit around at Starbucks and play video games because we are an "advanced" economy is naïve. For our own good we need significant numbers of people working in agriculture, extractive industries, and yes, manufacturing. It will grow the tax base and provide work for the millions of Americans projected to enter the workforce each year.

Automation is going to kill the need for agriculture and manufacturing labor. 10 years from now these jobs will be nonexistent. Now more than ever the US needs to be investing in smarter jobs that will actually last.
 
You do realize that the Obama administration changed the way the unemployed are accounted for to get those better numbers. Right now the number of unemployed workers in America is at an all time high. people talk about fake news but don't even realize when the wool has been pulled over their eyes.
Ok, cool. Then all of Trump's unemployment numbers are going to be equally flawed?
 
Slighty strange article graphic. However, it is nice to see the state the right color for a change!

/sorry to add fuel to what I imagine is currently 8 pages of political bickering.
 
There’s a big difference between can and will. At the end of the day younger Americans just aren’t particularly interested in being farmers, miners, or factory workers, and the ones that are likely don’t understand that this isn’t like a job in an older type of factory. They will need certain skill sets that aren’t a priority in certain parts of the country.

And? Its shouldn't be my problem when these people refuse these jobs and then need to work.

Time to stop codling people and bring them back to reality where there is no free lunch and where there isn't a job an American would refuse to do. Society needs to stop enabling these ass-clowns.
[doublepost=1501121469][/doublepost]
Its not that nobody thinks Americans can do these jobs, but people want better jobs. Manufacturing jobs are not that great. Long hours, stress on the body and crappy pay.

And? Sadly, people are destined to work remedial jobs. Its a simple, non-emotional, fact of life.
[doublepost=1501121643][/doublepost]
Why do you think Facebook is based out of Ireland or Apple does the same for their $100+ billion corporate profits parked there?

Because the Progressive wants to double-tax profits. Simple as that. Trillions parked overseas because the Progressive wants to take from Peter to give to the lazy welfare leach Paul to get votes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: old mac
The "specialized skills" was a big nothing burger. It was all about paying workers the least amount of money possible to maximize profits. In China, they can pay them peanuts so Apple manufactures there. If China becomes too expensive, Apple will leave. And the idea that these Chinese workers have any kind of specialized skills is ridiculous because most are coming from poor villages with little or no education. If they can figure out how to manufacture an iPhone, any American can.
Cost is the biggest problem for manufacturing in US, if they can't find enough people for assembly line operators then the wages will start to go through the roof. You can see in the news how assembling phones is boring at tiring job. and in China people go on vacation only for 2 times in an year 2 weeks each, and work 6 days a week.
[doublepost=1501122217][/doublepost]
Not just iPhones, but iPads and iMacs, eventually. Not just OLED, but micro-LED, eventually...

But what will they do, make a display panel in the USA, then ship it to Asia for assembly? Hmm, maybe that is economically good, the displays become exports rather than imports.
Foxconn doesn't have technology to manufacture OLED yet, they purchased Sharp so they can start making LCD panels.
[doublepost=1501122302][/doublepost]
Just a question - how many jobs are anticipated to remain long-term from Tesla?
From what I have read, Musk is hoping to make the line 100% automated.

I'm not in the US so I don't have a direct stake in any outcome here (though I am an Apple shareholder), however I would be concerned that this is simply a temporary job-creation. Apple (like other companies) has been pushing hard for maximal automation through robotics. I wonder if those jobs that remain will be predominantly in robotic engineering and maintenance.

Seems to me that a better idea would be to begin by allowing repatriation of foreign holdings at a low tax rate, then marginally increase the import tax. Then take this money and use it to support those whose jobs were eliminated while educating the younger workers so they can be the ones to maintain and advance the machinery. Historically, societies tend to fall apart when the separation between haves and have-nots becomes too large.

Full disclosure - politically, I lean right on certain issues, and left on others; as someone who is considered a high-income individual in my country (though my bank account doesn't support this....), I actually favour higher taxes on personal income but lower taxes on corporations. I have seen some evidence that this results in a lower discrepancy between the highest and lowest incomes in a company, and results in more money being kept in the company for re-investment and job creation. Having said that, if there is a better way to do things, I am open to being educated.

[Please don't respond just to tell me I'm wrong - I am happy to have an educational and informative discussion but nobody has time for ad hominem attacks and/or other time-wasting - thanks]

Bringing money from overseas will not increase investment in manufacturing, tax reform is badly needed to encourage manufacturing in US, i like the idea of Border tax from Ryan.
[doublepost=1501122387][/doublepost]
Its not that nobody thinks Americans can do these jobs, but people want better jobs. Manufacturing jobs are not that great. Long hours, stress on the body and crappy pay.

We are supposed to be a first world nation.

Reduce government benefits for people who can work but are depending on Government benefits.
[doublepost=1501122461][/doublepost]
But there is a big difference between 3000 and 13,000. Not only that, this is Trump. He is constantly stretching the truth. Why is it he can never get facts straight.

even 3K is better, Foxconn setting up a manufacturing plant is good PR.
[doublepost=1501122747][/doublepost]
It was political policy to outsource much of manufacturing in the first place. So yeah if someone resists a turn around in political policy it can make an administration look bad. If Apple doesn't work to correct their direction then I'm really hoping that Trumps administration takes punitive actions against them. One approach would be to tax Apple for off shore earnings wether they bring them back to the USA or not.

Apple doesn't have manufacturing plants in China, they outsource assembly of their products, there is no company is US than can assemble electronics (It is possible but not cost effective for some one to start a new assembly factory in US), only hope is for Taiwan/Chinese contract manufacturers to start manufacturing in US then Apple can start working with them in US to assemble phones, i still think cost is biggest factor.
 
Yes. All 3,000. The plant will be 85% Robotic Assembly with Robots made in China. But what the hell. It's a start. :apple:
Yeah you’re probably right. Doesn’t change that this is good news and Americans should be happy about it. I’d rather welcome 3000 new jobs than 0.
 
Utica, New York (my hometown) fought for this until they didn't. The politicians just gave up. It was really, truly bizarre. This is the second tech manufacturing plant to bail on a site reserved for a massive tech manufacturing plant right next to a State University of NY school.

While I'm truly sad for my area to have lost what turned out to be the Foxconn deal, this is a win for all of us in the end. Utica could have won big but even I understand their location decision. Good for them and good for all of us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coolbreeze
____________________
Yes, but they are a submissive work force....sleep in dorms.....they should build the plant in Illinois were the jobs are really needed...screw Wisconsin.....BTW why do you think ALL of the Trump Family products are made everywhere BUT the USA....cheap labor.
Wrong. The red MAGA hats are made in Louisiana. The cheap knockoffs are made overseas to undersell the real ones.

http://www.theadvocate.com/baton_ro...cle_5791e0b2-31fe-541a-9123-436c07745351.html
[doublepost=1501129386][/doublepost]
His many of Jobs 2.0 Apple products were manufactured in the United States? Maybe some BTO Macs? Certainly not their best selling products.
So in your opinion Americans are too good for manufacturing jobs? What nonsense.
 
This really has nothing to do with Apple. In the end, I doubt very much Apple's investment will amount to much (if any at all). These LCD displays are for Sharp. Let's try to restrain dRumpf's hyperbole for once.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.