Wow! I have never thought Apple support was all that helpful. I have had my run-ins with them being less than helpful. How this guy got all this info over the phone is amazing!
If I was him I'd be demanding some serious compensation. Something along the lines of free iDevice upgrades for life.
And if that failed, I'm sure the threat of a nice little article on Apple Security (or lack of) in the next issue of Wired would be a nice little hand to play.
No. That is not a back up at all.
1 copy on your device, 1 copy on media type a (cd, DVD, external hd) on site, 1 copy on media type b off site, 1 copy on a cloud service.
That's how you back up.
Each of those situations carries it's own risks and problems.
The cloud is meant to be the solution for this and I think it will be eventually. What most can hope for is that Apple increases their security and, hopefully, their recent acquisition of AuthenTec increases security locally and in the cloud.
Why? Because he didn't have backups of his data? Because he talks too much about personal stuff that gave someone the tools to spoof his id with apple?
Neither is Apple's fault.
Because it was being posted on 4chan as it went down. I was watching the thread on it yesterday in /g/. A 4channer did it, He was angry because for being a computer writer he seemed to have no idea how computers or any other technology work.
Completely agree. Having a thief being allowed to turn off my phone doesn't help me at all
I imagine that the hacker had less information on the author than a friend or acquaintance could gather on you. If it were this easy to social engineer a reset on your iCloud/AppleID account and gain access to whatever is tied to it (devices, other email, paypal, etc.), how isn't that Apple's fault?
And we know this story is legit because...?
Having one reporter say something doesn't make it true. Otherwise, we'd believe everything that the National Enquirer publishes.
I do feel like Apple will make an official response, either calling the guy's lie, or diffusing the story by coming clean and saying everyone on the iCloud team came into work this weekend to fix it.
Common Apple a company that cares alot about the security of its products is let down by someone in there support department who can reset the password of an iCloud account. this shouldn't be allowed!
Each of those situations carries it's own risks and problems.
The cloud is meant to be the solution for this and I think it will be eventually. What most can hope for is that Apple increases their security and, hopefully, their recent acquisition of AuthenTec increases security locally and in the cloud.
Dude had no backups? Are you kidding me? IMO that is the scariest part of this story; to think that somebody doesn't have enough common sense to back-up data. Makes me shiver!
Does remote wipe require a password as secondary security?
It's entirely Apple's fault.
Apple has (in virtually every major country) a legal obligation to protect the data of their customers.
When they fail to do that, they're breaking the law.
There's plenty that can be done to combat social engineering, but Apple hasn't ever stated what they do to combat it.
Also 1 Password/Lastpass/Keypass are amazing.
I don't know if this is reasonable... if your house burnt down with your Mac and your Time Machine backup, I'd still be pretty sympathetic.
And if it wasn't allowed, Apple would be blasted over that and their 'you forgot your password and the email is from five years ago and you can't access it anymore, sucks to be you' attitude
The comments on his Tumblr are insane. I mean granted, this is the internet, but **** me, what is wrong with people.
There is a middle way. I have an account on a site for trading stocks that will only send a password to either the registered address or your official address with snail mail after having answered a series of questions.
If you want to have an anonymous account you're screwed, but for the rest of us it's pretty safe...
Also, there are different passwords involved with logging in, transferring funds, selling, buying etc. that can't be the same.