Seem to be a number of threads here on MR regarding the inabilities of the nVidia 9600 and ATI 4850 video cards.Im asking for your "the hardware is crap" statement. No its not the bleeding edge, but does it not function well?
Seem to be a number of threads here on MR regarding the inabilities of the nVidia 9600 and ATI 4850 video cards.Im asking for your "the hardware is crap" statement. No its not the bleeding edge, but does it not function well?
It's the opinions of millions of people, which is the number 1 complaint about Macs.
Plus, it's a fact Macs are expensive, because they are significantly more than their PC counterparts.
As I said, my price configurations are far more reasonable than Apple's.
If you want to pay $1500 on $700 hardware be my guest.Im asking for your "the hardware is crap" statement. No its not the bleeding edge, but does it not function well?
It's the opinions of millions of people, which is the number 1 complaint about Macs.
No it bothers me that people call Microsoft M$ while Apple is the real one that rips people off (almost to the point of theft).And once again Apple doesn't care, nor does anyone else in this thread. So why do you bother? Do you expect people to all of the sudden have a revelation and start thinking like you and stop buying Macbooks? Or maybe that Steve Jobs will come into this thread and change the way he runs things because of your opinion? Do you really think that anyone who doesn't live under a rock doesn't know that Macs cost more than most PC's? It just bothers you that people don't agree with you.
If you want to pay $1500 on $700 hardware be my guest.
And I will gladly, because I dont buy from a spec sheet.
I want the OSX experience and Ill feel damn good dropping down that $1500 walking out of the store knowing i bought exactly what I wanted.
That just bothers the **** out of you though doesnt it?
You have never experienced OS X and you want to drop $1500 on it? As I said, if Windows bothers you so much, switch to Linux. Or buy the iMac.
Say NO to Apple Notebooks.
Consumer reports mean nothing. Apple notebooks have always had a history of failing. Heck I even heard one of the iBooks had a 75% failure rate.
No it bothers me that people call Microsoft M$ while Apple is the real one that rips people off (almost to the point of theft).
If you want the OS X experience get an iMac, at least they are somewhat reasonably priced.
Are you saving up for a MacBook or MacBook Pro?
Weak graphics cards, this sounds like you should be on an Nvidia forum bashing their products!
If you want to pay $1500 on $700 hardware be my guest.
No it bothers me that people call Microsoft M$ while Apple is the real one that rips people off (almost to the point of theft).
macbook for college.
What the CR stats confirm, in as objective a way as possible, is that such failures are far less frequent for Apple products than for their PC counterparts.
macbook for college.
Um what "little extras" does the Mac have that justifies the $500 price differences? What about the PC extras?It's just so convenient to just write-off all the little extras that really set Macs apart isn't it when they aren't on the spec sheet? You have tunnel vision, try looking at the bigger picture for once instead of just raw numbers. I bet that's how CR came to their conclusion.
Um what "little extras" does the Mac have that justifies the $500 price differences? What about the PC extras?
For the MacBook Pro, I wouldn't mind the option of a quad core + 9400M, or a 25 W* dual-core + 9700M.I would suggest that the Macbook is powerful enough for most consumers. However, I wouldn't mind an BTO option for a 9600M. That's the real problem. Not enough options.
Wow -- another one of these types of threads. Not surprised. Here's my pat answer...
As a person who uses his computers for business, I want and need the best. Sure the hardware outlay MAY be more, but how valuable is my time? If I have less trouble of the next 4 years (which is what I expect my computer to give me at least in service), then whatever I spend over and above the cheaper competition is worth it. I buy the best to last the long haul, not save a $100 in the short term.
Off the path (but not really): I know people who have made literally a million dollars with pirated software that costs $450. How cheap do you have to be? If you're in college, yeah, I can see trying to cut costs every way you can, but most of us here are making money with our macs/pcs... I don't know how anyone can quibble over someone else's decision to try and buy quality.
Um what "little extras" does the Mac have that justifies the $500 price differences? What about the PC extras?
Cool -- go to it. I prefer OS X.or getting what you want for considerable less.