Apple replaced the top case and screen of my 2017 15” MacBook Pro at least 5 times and eventually gave me a brand new 2018 model because I wasn’t still satisfied with the repair: I believe them when they say they loose money on repairs
Apple gave me a brand new computer on two separate occasions. So yeah. They would.
lol uh huh... and yet your signature includes:🤥 Liar liar 🤥
🔥 Pants on fire 🔥
iPad 3 ➛ 10.5" iPad Pro 64G Space Gray & Pencil
iPhone 6 Plus 64G Space Gray ➛ forced to ➛ iPhone X 64G by Apple's shameless throttling
15.4" rMPB Mid 2014 (screen replaced for 3 times for free, nice warranty Apple)
Watch Series 0 ➛ Watch Series 5
No, I know they don’t. I also know for a fact they pay well above 10/hr more than double in most cases.here you go: https://www.glassdoor.co.uk/Salary/Apple-Salaries-E1138.htm Did you seriously thnk they employ highly trained experts? 🤣
It's a point... they usually do (even a little bit outta warranty) if you whinge enough in a packed store that has a refurbished one sitting out the back (then they'll just refurbish yours and give it to the next whinger).
Apple isn’t under any obligation to sell you an upgradable computer, any more than they would be an upgradable iPhone.Also, the products they sell. People will have to select higher specs, knowing that you can't upgrade RAM or HD space after you buy it. A lot of people select minimum specs and add those upgrades later instead getting from higher price Apple.
Be interesting to see a breakdown of that calculation. Presumably they include warranty jobs and aren't just talking about paid repairs and exclude replacements that you've gotta pay for because they won't repair?
There's always a trick... Apple aren't feeding the homeless by saying 'nah sorry the green sticker is now red from sweat/humidity, you'll have to pay $400 for a replacement'.
[automerge]1574283576[/automerge]
Three flaws in that logic:
1. Who says batteries were busted? They just throttled older devices, not ones (including new ones that are faulty) with busted batteries. If it was outta good will (and concern that batteries won't last long enough) they woulda had a message to users of new phones saying 'hey your battery is faulty, take it in for a free replacement!'
2. The devices didn't magically throttle back to top-speed when you replaced the battery, so it had nothing to do with your battery's capacity. If it was to do with batteries then they wouldn't have throttled, they woulda had a message saying 'hey your battery is running at 70% capacity... replace it!!'
3. It has nothing to do with their repair policy, it was just a mean spirited nudge tactic that enabled them to say 'maybe get a new phone' when people came in saying 'my phone is running slow' and generic tips like 'delete a few apps or do a full restore to flush things out' didn't do anything. Oh duh, because Apple had hard-coded the devices to run slowly!
No, I know they don’t. I also know for a fact they pay well above 10/hr more than double in most cases.
Apple replaced the top case and screen of my 2017 15” MacBook Pro at least 5 times and eventually gave me a brand new 2018 model because I wasn’t still satisfied with the repair: I believe them when they say they loose money on repairs
To believe that Apple would operate in that manner and benefit from that type of behavior long term would require me to believe Apple customers are stupid, constantly replacing expensive equipment only to have it fail, and replace it again, over and over and over. Sounds like an excellent way fo Apple to piss off its customer base and drive itself out of business.They profit from the repairs costing so much, that people just go out and buy a new one that's sold at a 20-30% profit margin...
You have to take a step back and look at the bigger picture. They’re almost certainly including their AppleCare in-warranty repairs. The letter they sent is legally binding. I guarantee they flat out can back it up with data.As someone who has worked as a Genius - I call BS.
Sorry, but charging more than the cost price of an iPhone to repair a minor fault, which they then repair and send back out - is profit making.
Also - the prices of some of the service parts are atrocious. We used to charge like £350 for a failed iMac HDD.
Effectively what they do is charge far more than (new) retail for refurb parts, and only warranty them for 90 days. labour costs are minimal considering most geniuses make < £10/hour.
Every year since 2009.What's the bet the loss is only because they had to replace so many main boards connected to butterfly keyboards.
<snip>
The Macrumor article is about the anti trust probe, so yeah, anti trust is the general theme of the conversation.No, you're arguing a strawman.
I never said there is anything "anti trust" or "monopoly" in this thread. WHatever your response is, it isn't relevant to anything I've said.
My point is how Apple and Google exert police their respective platforms. Take the vaping app ban for example. Apple just went and did it without any public comment and without consulting any developers. It's not like iOS users can just go to the Google Play Store to get those apps back. I don't want to get into the merits of the actual ban (that is irrelevant here), the point is that its an very important decision that affects a lot of the public that Apple just went and made in a black box. That is wrong.
No, they’re not impossible to repair, but they’re impossible for you and most end users to repair, that is true enough.They are impossible to repair so you end up buying a new one.
The Macrumor article is about the anti trust probe, so yeah, anti trust is the general theme of the conversation.
For the vaping app ban, Apple did explain why and their stance. And like I said, it’s a closed system. Just because it’s closed doesn’t mean it’s wrong.
Didn’t “whinge” and it wasn’t a packed store. Good try though. Clearly you had a bad experience and you want to project that onto everyone else for some reason. One was given to me through telephone support and the other was in a virtually empty store during a walk up appointment. For an extremely out of warranty computer.It's a point... they usually do (even a little bit outta warranty) if you whinge enough in a packed store that has a refurbished one sitting out the back (then they'll just refurbish yours and give it to the next whinger).
That said, I once got accused of punching an attendant (in a packed store with 2 kids in my arms). They called security, made me wait 2 hours (kids were impossible). Afterwards, a different person came out with a replacement product saying 'you are lucky they couldn't find any evidence!!! Here is a refurbished one... but we've marked a red flag against you for this incident so you won't be getting any support in the future'. I've since received support. Still no idea where the punch claim came from or whether there's some kinda red flag against me in their system for something that never happened.
Exactly what Title of SOX are you referring to? Unless Apple has to breakout their repair income and expenses on a published public financial statement SOX is irrelevant. I assume they aren’t compelled by FASB/GAAP to do that because if they were Congress wouldn’t have to make a special request for the info since it would already be public.Right, they purposefully want to run afoul of the sorebanes-oxley act.
Not impossible, just difficult. No different than most other consumer electronic devices of this day and age.They are impossible to repair so you end up buying a new one.
Lying about financial matters, as has been suggested is illegal. If the CEO of Apple says they operate their repair business at a loss (or don't make any profit) and the CEO is flat out lying, he/she can't claim ignorance.Exactly what Title of SOX are you referring to? Unless Apple has to breakout their repair income and expenses on a published public financial statement SOX is irrelevant. I assume they aren’t compelled by FASB/GAAP to do that because if they were Congress wouldn’t have to make a special request for the info since it would already be public.
Look up Hollywood accounting. It is easy to make it look like you made no money....
Lying about financial matters, as has been suggested is illegal. If the CEO of Apple says they operate their repair business at a loss (or don't make any profit) and the CEO is flat out lying, he/she can't claim ignorance.
I’ve only had one experience with Apple Care for a brand new out of the box 3rd gen iPad and it was a negative experience. In contrast, the online Apple Store was great and told me just return it for a full refund.And yet there I was at the Genius Bar, facing an out-of-warranty £800 screen replacement on a MacBook Pro, and Apple decided to repair it at their cost as a goodwill gesture. And no, it wasn't any kind of recall or commonly known issue. Just an unexpected random failure.
Everyone has an anecdote, of course, but mine certainly doesn't fit into the "Apple rip everyone off for profit" narrative 😎