Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
62,097
28,032



Apple is telling its suppliers to cut production on new iPhones by 10 percent over the course of the next three months, reports Nikkei.

Apple made the request of its suppliers late last month, asking them to produce fewer iPhones for the January-March quarter.

iphone-xs-vs-xr.jpg

This is the second time that Apple has recently cut down on iPhone production, and Nikkei says Apple made the decision prior to issuing its guidance downgrade last week.

The production revision applies to all of Apple's new iPhone models, including the iPhone XS, XS Max, and XR. "The level of revision is different for each supplier and depends on the product mix they supply," an unnamed source told Nikkei.

A second source said that overall production volume of both new and old iPhones will be reduced by approximately 40 to 43 million units for the January-March quarter, down from an earlier projection of 47 to 48 million units.

Due to weak iPhone sales in China, the effects of the U.S.-China trade war, cheap battery replacements, and other factors, Apple cut its Q1 2019 revenue guidance to $84 billion, down from the $89 to $93 billion guidance issued in November, and with the production cuts, those issues may continue further into the year.

Apple CEO Tim Cook just today said, however, that reports suggesting the iPhone XR is a flop or selling poorly are "bologna," and that the device has been the best selling iPhone every day since it launched.

Article Link: Apple Tells Suppliers to Cut iPhone XR and XS Production by 10% for Next Three Months
 

cycomiko

macrumors 6502a
Oct 14, 2008
549
491
Nikkei is about as unreliable as it gets, but it’s not like a production cut after Xmas wouldn’t make sense.

Seems the iPhone did well everywhere except China.

Apple needs an “emerging markets” phone.


Claiming iphone did everywhere but china, and actually iphone actually doing well everywhere but china..

The USA dollar strengthened, which means setting a stupidly high USD price impacts non-US sales even more than the high price impacts US sales. Here, in 10 years the user price for the top end iphone went from $1350 to $2800 NZD.
 

CordovaLark

macrumors regular
Mar 12, 2018
207
239
Nikkei is about as unreliable as it gets, but it’s not like a production cut after Xmas wouldn’t make sense.

Seems the iPhone did well everywhere except China.

Apple needs an “emerging markets” phone.

Yes, that's right fake news. iPads don't bend it's the tables they are on that are bent in photos. Siri isn't bad, it's that all AI's are confused by multiple zip codes.
 

KPandian1

macrumors 65816
Oct 22, 2013
1,493
2,428
While the XR version of the iPhone may be the best selling iPhone ever :rolleyes:, Apple planned for even more that they targeted production way above thees numbers.

So, the cut in production report is believable; it is Apple that cuts its earnings estimate that lead to the decline. Yes the regular stock market also crashed, but Apple suffered more.

Nikkei is about as unreliable as it gets, but it’s not like a production cut after Xmas wouldn’t make sense.

Do you have proof that the Nikkei is an unreliable source - I am asking sincere-mode.

I am an Apple fan, company and products; not so much the recent Mac range!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pamela5

nviz22

Cancelled
Jun 24, 2013
5,277
3,071
I don't think Tim Cook is the right person for an Apple innovational rebound. If you want someone to produce strong financial results and please shareholders? Tim Cook is your guy. If you want someone who can pioneer an iPhone rebound, revitalize Siri, not demonstrate yesteryear Apple hubris, and be bold? Then Tim Cook isn't your guy.

I am not going to say pre-Jobs or post-Jobs arguments here. I am just going to critique Cook's tenure:

iOS 11 and its buggy fiasco, Siri being unshackled up a bit occurred way after the Google Assistant started its major strides, AirPower not even being out, iPad Pro and iPhone bending, lack of innovations w/ the iOS beyond being a touchscreen based environment, stagnant Mac products, etc.

I think Apple needs to understand that its "differentiation" is not going to work on branding alone. When you can get better features, good enough software, and more value from your purchases at a fraction of the price? You're probably leaning towards the more affordable product.

China is the most populous nation on the planet. Apple can still appease and entice their customers without resorting to Moto G pricing and products. To disrupt a mature market? It requires bold thinking and risk taking.

You have a processor capable of powering a laptop, but you have the OS that has UI elements since iOS 7 and the functionality of generations old Android software. Why, why, why?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.