Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Forget the 13" iPad. Give us transformable Macbook Air for crying out loud.

NEVER. GOING. TO. HAPPEN.

Apple is not into "oragami" devices... Apple HATES moving parts or extra buttons. That is why they sacked Optical drives and standard Hard Drives and removable batteries. they'd sack internal fans but X86 chips aren't there yet.
 
I thought both of the people whining about the iPhone screen size already switched to Android.

Seriously though, this will be a headache for developers and will lead to Android-style fragmentation. The biggest advantage of the iPhone over Android (though there are many) is the diverse app ecosystem. Let's keep things simple for developers instead of making them create apps for 8 different screen sizes. Less time wasted on fragmentation leads to better apps. Seriously, if you want a gigantic, barely-fits-in-your-pocket, wildebeest of a smartphone, just get an iPad Mini or switch to Android. Take a quick glance at sales numbers for iPhone vs. Galaxy Note/Note 2 and it's obvious that it the market doesn't want a gigantic phone. It's not worth the developer headaches to please a handful of whiny people.

And if they make a huge iPad, I'm definitely calling it the Max iPad.


Way to totally pick a niche product and then compare it to the iPhone. There is no reasonable logic in this argument.

And why couldn't Apple release a 4.5-4.8 inch screen with the resolution of say the iPad Mini? That would keep the number of resolutions a developer has to deal with the same. You do realize that there is no indication whatsoever that Apple would eliminate the current size iPhone all together just because they released a larger size? Just because you wouldn't want a product doesn't mean others wouldn't as well.
 
We want the iPhone bigger and the iPad smaller. Does anyone else see a problem with that? Maybe the users don't really have it all figured out and we just want what we don't have. Maybe we should let the experts decide what's best for us (Steve's 3.5 inch screen).
 
I thought both of the people whining about the iPhone screen size already switched to Android.

Seriously though, this will be a headache for developers and will lead to Android-style fragmentation. The biggest advantage of the iPhone over Android (though there are many) is the diverse app ecosystem. Let's keep things simple for developers instead of making them create apps for 8 different screen sizes. Less time wasted on fragmentation leads to better apps. Seriously, if you want a gigantic, barely-fits-in-your-pocket, wildebeest of a smartphone, just get an iPad Mini or switch to Android. Take a quick glance at sales numbers for iPhone vs. Galaxy Note/Note 2 and it's obvious that it the market doesn't want a gigantic phone. It's not worth the developer headaches to please a handful of whiny people.

And if they make a huge iPad, I'm definitely calling it the Max iPad.

Please tell me 'Johnny', that you are actually a woman. if not, get off the keyboard and start looking at the average male hands.

There are far more then 2 people with hands big enough to hold large devices. I can hold my ipad mini in one hand and my hands are not super large..
 
Larger screen iphone would be sweet,but 13 inch iPad sounds stupid..7.9 and 9.7 are perfect.
 
With a 13" iPad being unnecessarily large for iOS, why not make it run OSX instead. They could definitely fit the internals of a MBA inside of something that big. I would love to see OSX on a touchscreen device
 
siding and eavestrough Toronto

I visited your site & after visiting i found that it is very informational for everyone you have done really a great job thank you
 
I thought both of the people whining about the iPhone screen size already switched to Android.

Seriously though, this will be a headache for developers and will lead to Android-style fragmentation. The biggest advantage of the iPhone over Android (though there are many) is the diverse app ecosystem. Let's keep things simple for developers instead of making them create apps for 8 different screen sizes. Less time wasted on fragmentation leads to better apps. Seriously, if you want a gigantic, barely-fits-in-your-pocket, wildebeest of a smartphone, just get an iPad Mini or switch to Android. Take a quick glance at sales numbers for iPhone vs. Galaxy Note/Note 2 and it's obvious that it the market doesn't want a gigantic phone. It's not worth the developer headaches to please a handful of whiny people.

And if they make a huge iPad, I'm definitely calling it the Max iPad.

You don't know what you're talking about. 3.5 inch screens are a thing of the past, that's a 2008 paradigm. They went out of fashion, just like non-touch screen phones. Also people don't want to carry around 50 different things, maybe I don't want my ipad mini all over the place. Otherwise, why would I need a smartphone? Take a glance at the new galaxy s4, 5 inch screen its sales are through the roof. As for developers, they will only have to deal with 3 screen sizes, 3.5 (soon to be extinct as those contracts have already ended and people will be flocking towards the 5/5s), 4, 4.5+. I'd hardly call that much fragmentation.
 
After having used the form factor of a Samsung Galaxy S2 for 4 1/2 months, I found that although the screen size was pleasant to look at, for me, the size of the phone was just too much.

I now have the iPhone 5 (first time I've ever had an iPhone) and am so happy with its size/form.

Choice is always a good thing though, and I'm sure Apple would sell a lot of larger screened iPhones, but they'll have to seriously compete on a price level with the competition. Don't know how that will work out.
 
I don't see what the problem is in offering different sized products, other than the supply chain problem in being able to produce the massive quantity of Apple's product requirements. As long as it in in ADDITION TO and not in Place of, what is wrong with choice? One size fits all just doesn't work anymore. I for one would LOVE both a larger iPhone and iPad. But I understand the others might not. So why not make everybody happy. :)
 
I seriously doubt they would make a 13 inch iPad. What I am really hoping is that they are testing a 13 inch touchscreen for a MacBook Air. I won't buy one until it gets touch. As it is now, I'm so used to using my iPad with a logitech keyboard, every time I go back to using my 17 inch MacBookPro, I constantly find myself reaching for the screen to move something around only to quickly be reminded it isn't a touchscreen.

Unfortunately for you sir there are only twelve other people in world who desire a touch screen mac. So, I guess you won't be getting a 13" Macbook Air.
 
With a 13" iPad being unnecessarily large for iOS, why not make it run OSX instead. They could definitely fit the internals of a MBA inside of something that big. I would love to see OSX on a touchscreen device

Simply put no. Os X would be horrible on a touch screen device. Not to mention what you're suggesting is putting x86 intel processors into a tablet form factor (see surface for how well that has been implemented). That means a battery life hit, fans, and extra bulk. We're not there yet.
 
Way to totally pick a niche product and then compare it to the iPhone. There is no reasonable logic in this argument.

And why couldn't Apple release a 4.5-4.8 inch screen with the resolution of say the iPad Mini? That would keep the number of resolutions a developer has to deal with the same.

...

No, this would add another resolution/dpi for devs to deal with because iPad apps would get way too small to be usable on a 4.5-4.8" screen.

That being said I do believe that Apple should and will release an iPhone with a larger screen, and the transition to iOS 7 is the perfect time for them to do this.

It would make sense for them to use 1024x768 on a 4.3-4.5" screen, but like I said it would require devs to rework their app to use the auto-layout APIs.

Bonus: a retina iPad could run four of the larger iPhone apps in split-screen multitasking.
 
Without proper filesytem?.... not yet.

I can do without a proper file system. I can do without a bigger screen. To go completely laptopless, I NEED more storage. 64GB just doesn't cut it. 128's getting there...but at least 256/512 would be bestest, with a thunderbolt port for all your mouse/keyboard/monitor add-ons. It would be so great.
 
but that's you.

If you felt a 250cc motorcycle or a 1 litre small car was fine for you, do you think the makers of cars and bikes should not make any larger/more powerful vehicles just because you are happy with the low power models?

I know this is Alien to many Apple users, but not all people are the same or want the same.

It's never been that apple buy Apple as it's the exact model they want. they don't have any choice, if they want an iPhone they buy the only size there is.

that has been the problem with steve jobs all alone, he told you what you should have, treating his customer like children. With him thankfully out of the way now, hopefully Apple users can enjoy some choice and still own Apple.

Don't you talk that way about Steve! >:-(
 
iPad Maxi is a lousy name

ya gotta be kidding me, iPad Maxi would be an absolutely lousy name.
I know Maxi pads are a "feminine product" and one would not want their new product associated with a "feminine product" of this sort.
 
I doubt very seriously that they will discontinue the smaller phone and iPad. I am hoping they offer these larger devices in ADDITION to what they have now. Making the iphone longer did nothing for me. a 13 inch iPad sounds fantastic!

Apple has got to attract more customers as Samsung and other larger phones as VERY popular.

Some of you diehards are SO confident that they will not make a larger iPhone but then they introduced the 5! I am betting we will have a larger iPhone and tablet after the 5S for us people with normal size hands!:p
 
Why this focus on musicians?

I can see a market for both of these ideas, although I personally wouldn't want a tablet that large. It might be good for artists and musicians though.

How about ANYONE that commonly looks at material the size of a single page? In my case, I have to read about 10 research articles a day, and they are in typical 2-column form with graphs containing a lot of detail and micro-print. Reading them on a current iPad, which is the size of a half of a page, is just about impossible.

In general, viewing anything more complex than a recreational novel requires a full page size - that's why full page sizes were invented.

(8.5" x 11" = 14" diagonal, so 13" is just slightly smaller than a single page.)

IMO, the portability issue is due ONLY to weight - if you could make a full page iPad as light as a Mini, you could hold it in one hand as easily as you can hold a plastic clip board.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.