Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
yay, now google can read our text messages.
The more you know.
WduWwWk.png
 
That's what people don't get. RCS is about messaging features now having parity or near parity with iMessage. Couldn't care less about the color.
While RCS has relative parity, Apple's implementation of RCS will likely be such that significant pain points will still exist. Particularly in group chats, which is where most of the blue/green bubble hate comes from. Currently Apple handicaps the entire chat when a single non-imessage user joins the chat. That is an intentional decision on Apple's part. It doesn't need to be that way, even with SMS. You can bet that the situation will be very similar with RCS. It's in Apple's best interest from a sales standpoint to keep it that way
 
Where will the key exchange happen? How will that cross services? This is not the same as any other encrypted data as end to end encryption usually happens within a single service. Even with encrypted email it can't be read outside of that mail service's ecosystem without providing credentials to the initial service. Signal and iMessage aren't going to just work out of the box.
ok. I oversimplified it, obviously. Who knows what Apple / GSMA / whomever comes up with as a standard. Could be a key server with public / private keys (a la PGP). Could be something more seamless like an extension of the contact key in Messages now. We'll have to wait and see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
Hopefully as part of an international standard by IEEE.

I'm still hoping on the iPhone, in the Messages app we'll see:

Incoming iMessage text in blue bubble
Incoming SMS text in green bubble
Income RCS text in orange or gray bubble
Yeah that's cool. I'm a little surprised that you can't change the colors on iPhones. They seem to have come a long way with customization. On my Pixel, I can't specify the exact color of bubbles, but they will match whatever theme color I have set for the entire OS which I can change to anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
While RCS has relative parity, Apple's implementation of RCS will likely be such that significant pain points will still exist. Particularly in group chats, which is where most of the blue/green bubble hate comes from. Currently Apple handicaps the entire chat when a single non-imessage user joins the chat. That is an intentional decision on Apple's part. It doesn't need to be that way, even with SMS. You can bet that the situation will be very similar with RCS. It's in Apple's beat interest from a sales standpoint to keep it that way
This is what I'm afraid of. Just like with the hamstrung USB C port on the non-Pro iPhone 15s, Apple could very well implement this and still find ways to hinder the experience.
 
Never thought that this day will come. In fact, it's not bad for Apple. I don't think that Apple buyers were staying only because of iMessage. But, this move will shake the market for WhatsApp/Telegram which are popular outside USA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ki77erb
It's not pompous for a customer to be displeased at losing functionality in their messaging client because of those green contacts. This was developed by experience over time, not arrogance or elitism.
While RCS has relative parity, Apple's implementation of RCS will likely be such that significant pain points will still exist. Particularly in group chats, which is where most of the blue/green bubble hate comes from. Currently Apple handicaps the entire chat when a single non-imessage user joins the chat. That is an intentional decision on Apple's part. It doesn't need to be that way, even with SMS. You can bet that the situation will be very similar with RCS. It's in Apple's best interest from a sales standpoint to keep it that way
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NetMage
While RCS has relative parity, Apple's implementation of RCS will likely be such that significant pain points will still exist. Particularly in group chats, which is where most of the blue/green bubble hate comes from. Currently Apple handicaps the entire chat when a single non-imessage user joins the chat. That is an intentional decision on Apple's part. It doesn't need to be that way, even with SMS. You can bet that the situation will be very similar with RCS. It's in Apple's best interest from a sales standpoint to keep it that way

I have a feeling EU regulators will see to it that it's not the case. I'm not saying that it's going to have the same features as iMessage, but the group chat scenario is part of the reason why the EU has been threatening regulation in the first place.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: strongy and jamezr
They should have just turned it on one day and waited to see if anyone noticed. But now that RCS support is coming, Apple can start a campaign urging Google to fix the years-old problem in which an Android user turns on RCS and then the phone spends weeks in "waiting to verify" status and never actually has the feature.
 
Great, if/when it happens. Given Google’s business model and 10 year record of starting and stopping constantly on what they promise it wouldn’t surprise me if they rolled out yet another client to bake it into and abandon their 4th (5th?) attempt 🤷‍♂️
Yes, we all know about Google's history of messaging failures. But not with RCS; they've been nothing but persistent for years and the client experience has continuously improved (at least from my perspective - I've been using Google Messages with RCS for 4 years or so).

Google tried for years to drag the carriers along, as was the original plan. But they're all incompetent and threw in their towels. So Google is now the only other party that matters in this announcement. Apple PR would never say it, but if the announcement is sincere it would be silly to think that engineering teams from both companies aren't already collaborating behind NDAs. The standards body can record the agreements that the two mobile behemoths arrive at.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
Cool now can we please change the icon to blue
They will not. And apple will still find a way to make group chats painful when non-imessage users join the chat. Even with SMS, there's no technical reason the entire group chat needs to be handicapped because of a single user. That's an intentional decision on Apple's part. It's in their best interest financially. That won't change under RCS. Apple will still find a way to make it painful
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NetMage
There is no way Apple would sign onto this if E2E encryption wouldn't be implemented.
I disagree. This isn't meant to be on par with iMessage, the more they can differentiate between the two while still implementing a passable version of RCS, the better for them. They can then tell Google and co. that they've done what they asked and continue to boast about how much better and safer iMessage is.

They're doing this to avoid regulation, not to benefit users.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula and kc9hzn
Current SMS/MMS don't use E2E. Apple could see this as an upgrade to messaging experience even if it still doesn't include E2E. Either way, has this been confirmed? As I understand it, for E2E to work, it has to all be within the same system. (i.e. Google's running the whole system or Apple is running the whole system.)
They will hopefully use an open cross-platform encryption standard. Google is switching to MLS for that very reason.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula and NetMage
Repeat after me.

This makes messaging people who have Android devices better for iPhone users as you get all the same imessage features when texting people on android. You no longer have to send low quality videos and pictures when you text android users, you can now properly react to messages with android users without getting that stupid "x liked your text" messages. And potential for E2E encryption if they implement Google RCS extension.

Its a good thing.
SMS already exists for communicating with people on Android. I don't care that Android users don't have iOS functions. Forcing a company to destroy it's ecosystem because it's better than a rival's is wrong as it stifles innovation. Why take incentive away from Apple to create better products? Apple doesn't have dominance in smartphone volumes, Google does. Why is Google so keen on using iOS services instead of making their own ecosystem better? It makes no sense at all.

I have both iOS and Android but after learning of this, I'm getting rid of my Android devices. What a sad, pathetic move by Google.
 
Finally!! Don't understand why anyone would be against this. I wonder if they had some insider knowledge of how the interopability ruling was going to go? Apple is facing a lot of anticonsumer headwinds at the moment.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: strongy
I disagree. This isn't meant to be on par with iMessage, the more they can differentiate between the two while still implementing a passable version of RCS, the better for them. They can then tell Google and co. that they've done what they asked and continue to boast about how much better and safer iMessage is.

They're doing this to avoid regulation, not to benefit users.
And what would their defense be when people rightfully roasted them for not prioritizing their users' privacy?
 
I disagree. This isn't meant to be on par with iMessage, the more they can differentiate between the two while still implementing a passable version of RCS, the better for them. They can then tell Google and co. that they've done what they asked and continue to boast about how much better and safer iMessage is.

They're doing this to avoid regulation, not to benefit users.

You don't think the EU will require encryption on RCS? With all of the boasting Apple does regarding privacy and security, it would be insane not to take advantage of the support on RCS. The EU will not take kindly to Apple intentionally hobbling RCS security in order to boost iMessage.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: strongy and NetMage
RCS Chat by Google ALSO makes a distinction when sending to SMS/MMS/iMessage. This isn't unique to Apple.
Well, sure. The input box says "RCS Message" instead of "Text Message" and there is a "RCS Chat with xxx" line near the top of the window with a "details" link that shows me what RCS features are enabled and allows me to turn those on or off when chatting with whichever contact that happens to be.

The whole "bubble colour stigma" (some other posters' words, not mine) is an adolescent-level peer-pressure marketing... thing... that is unique to the Apple world.
 
No, it's about who hosts the servers, as I understand it. This makes it equally Google/Apple.
Its a Apple problem if they want to adopt Universal Profile but not Google's extension for E2EE like they stated. Instead they want to "work" with GSMA to add E2EE to the standard. Meanwhile, every major carrier in the US has switched to Google Jibe and for client side, google messages and they all have E2EE. Its a Apple problem, if they don't want to work with Google to use the opensource signal protocol, a solution that is already there. I want the GSMA to add an encryption protocol to the Universal Profile but there is a solution out there that most carriers have adopted which already has E2EE.

Verizon

Tmobile

Att
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NetMage
Why do some of you people insist on making stupid comments. The messages are E2EE meaning google does not have the security key to snoop into your messages no more than Apple has the key to open iMessage.

WduWwWk.png
Point me to any Google statement that says they do NOT have any way to access to the encryption keys, even in response to a national security letter.

Point me to any Apple statement that says that they do NOT have any way to access to the encryption keys, even in response to a national security letter.

I have asked for this a couple of times and it has not been forth coming.

Edit:

Even more this from WikiPedia
```
A backdoor is usually a secret method of bypassing normal authentication or encryption in a computer system, a product, an embedded device, etc.[36] Companies may also willingly or unwillingly introduce backdoors to their software that help subvert key negotiation or bypass encryption altogether. In 2013, information leaked by Edward Snowden showed that Skype had a backdoor which allowed Microsoft to hand over their users' messages to the NSA despite the fact that those messages were officially end-to-end encrypted.[37][38]
```
 
Last edited:
SMS already exists for communicating with people on Android. Forcing a company to destroy it's ecosystem because it's better than a rival's is wrong as it stifles innovation. Why take incentive away to create better products? Apple doesn't have dominance in smartphone volumes, Google does. Why is Google so keen on using iOS services? It makes no sense at all.
SMS has both security flaws and is essentially featureless. No one is forcing a company to "destroy it's ecosystem" because nothing is changing for iPhone users communicating with other iPhone users. "Why is Google so keen on using iOS services?" What does that even mean? Google isn't using any iOS services here. "It makes no sense at all." Maybe that's because you don't seem to understand what all this means. Not trying to be mean, just basing that on your comment.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.