The more you know.yay, now google can read our text messages.

The more you know.yay, now google can read our text messages.
While RCS has relative parity, Apple's implementation of RCS will likely be such that significant pain points will still exist. Particularly in group chats, which is where most of the blue/green bubble hate comes from. Currently Apple handicaps the entire chat when a single non-imessage user joins the chat. That is an intentional decision on Apple's part. It doesn't need to be that way, even with SMS. You can bet that the situation will be very similar with RCS. It's in Apple's best interest from a sales standpoint to keep it that wayThat's what people don't get. RCS is about messaging features now having parity or near parity with iMessage. Couldn't care less about the color.
ok. I oversimplified it, obviously. Who knows what Apple / GSMA / whomever comes up with as a standard. Could be a key server with public / private keys (a la PGP). Could be something more seamless like an extension of the contact key in Messages now. We'll have to wait and see.Where will the key exchange happen? How will that cross services? This is not the same as any other encrypted data as end to end encryption usually happens within a single service. Even with encrypted email it can't be read outside of that mail service's ecosystem without providing credentials to the initial service. Signal and iMessage aren't going to just work out of the box.
Yeah that's cool. I'm a little surprised that you can't change the colors on iPhones. They seem to have come a long way with customization. On my Pixel, I can't specify the exact color of bubbles, but they will match whatever theme color I have set for the entire OS which I can change to anything.Hopefully as part of an international standard by IEEE.
I'm still hoping on the iPhone, in the Messages app we'll see:
Incoming iMessage text in blue bubble
Incoming SMS text in green bubble
Income RCS text in orange or gray bubble
This is what I'm afraid of. Just like with the hamstrung USB C port on the non-Pro iPhone 15s, Apple could very well implement this and still find ways to hinder the experience.While RCS has relative parity, Apple's implementation of RCS will likely be such that significant pain points will still exist. Particularly in group chats, which is where most of the blue/green bubble hate comes from. Currently Apple handicaps the entire chat when a single non-imessage user joins the chat. That is an intentional decision on Apple's part. It doesn't need to be that way, even with SMS. You can bet that the situation will be very similar with RCS. It's in Apple's beat interest from a sales standpoint to keep it that way
While RCS has relative parity, Apple's implementation of RCS will likely be such that significant pain points will still exist. Particularly in group chats, which is where most of the blue/green bubble hate comes from. Currently Apple handicaps the entire chat when a single non-imessage user joins the chat. That is an intentional decision on Apple's part. It doesn't need to be that way, even with SMS. You can bet that the situation will be very similar with RCS. It's in Apple's best interest from a sales standpoint to keep it that wayIt's not pompous for a customer to be displeased at losing functionality in their messaging client because of those green contacts. This was developed by experience over time, not arrogance or elitism.
While RCS has relative parity, Apple's implementation of RCS will likely be such that significant pain points will still exist. Particularly in group chats, which is where most of the blue/green bubble hate comes from. Currently Apple handicaps the entire chat when a single non-imessage user joins the chat. That is an intentional decision on Apple's part. It doesn't need to be that way, even with SMS. You can bet that the situation will be very similar with RCS. It's in Apple's best interest from a sales standpoint to keep it that way
That's a Apple issue not a Google issue.It hasn't been made clear yet if E2EE will be implemented here, keeping the question open.
It hasn't been made clear yet if E2EE will be implemented here, keeping the question open.
Yes, we all know about Google's history of messaging failures. But not with RCS; they've been nothing but persistent for years and the client experience has continuously improved (at least from my perspective - I've been using Google Messages with RCS for 4 years or so).Great, if/when it happens. Given Google’s business model and 10 year record of starting and stopping constantly on what they promise it wouldn’t surprise me if they rolled out yet another client to bake it into and abandon their 4th (5th?) attempt 🤷♂️
They will not. And apple will still find a way to make group chats painful when non-imessage users join the chat. Even with SMS, there's no technical reason the entire group chat needs to be handicapped because of a single user. That's an intentional decision on Apple's part. It's in their best interest financially. That won't change under RCS. Apple will still find a way to make it painfulCool now can we please change the icon to blue
I disagree. This isn't meant to be on par with iMessage, the more they can differentiate between the two while still implementing a passable version of RCS, the better for them. They can then tell Google and co. that they've done what they asked and continue to boast about how much better and safer iMessage is.There is no way Apple would sign onto this if E2E encryption wouldn't be implemented.
They will hopefully use an open cross-platform encryption standard. Google is switching to MLS for that very reason.Current SMS/MMS don't use E2E. Apple could see this as an upgrade to messaging experience even if it still doesn't include E2E. Either way, has this been confirmed? As I understand it, for E2E to work, it has to all be within the same system. (i.e. Google's running the whole system or Apple is running the whole system.)
SMS already exists for communicating with people on Android. I don't care that Android users don't have iOS functions. Forcing a company to destroy it's ecosystem because it's better than a rival's is wrong as it stifles innovation. Why take incentive away from Apple to create better products? Apple doesn't have dominance in smartphone volumes, Google does. Why is Google so keen on using iOS services instead of making their own ecosystem better? It makes no sense at all.Repeat after me.
This makes messaging people who have Android devices better for iPhone users as you get all the same imessage features when texting people on android. You no longer have to send low quality videos and pictures when you text android users, you can now properly react to messages with android users without getting that stupid "x liked your text" messages. And potential for E2E encryption if they implement Google RCS extension.
Its a good thing.
And what would their defense be when people rightfully roasted them for not prioritizing their users' privacy?I disagree. This isn't meant to be on par with iMessage, the more they can differentiate between the two while still implementing a passable version of RCS, the better for them. They can then tell Google and co. that they've done what they asked and continue to boast about how much better and safer iMessage is.
They're doing this to avoid regulation, not to benefit users.
I disagree. This isn't meant to be on par with iMessage, the more they can differentiate between the two while still implementing a passable version of RCS, the better for them. They can then tell Google and co. that they've done what they asked and continue to boast about how much better and safer iMessage is.
They're doing this to avoid regulation, not to benefit users.
Well, sure. The input box says "RCS Message" instead of "Text Message" and there is a "RCS Chat with xxx" line near the top of the window with a "details" link that shows me what RCS features are enabled and allows me to turn those on or off when chatting with whichever contact that happens to be.RCS Chat by Google ALSO makes a distinction when sending to SMS/MMS/iMessage. This isn't unique to Apple.
Its a Apple problem if they want to adopt Universal Profile but not Google's extension for E2EE like they stated. Instead they want to "work" with GSMA to add E2EE to the standard. Meanwhile, every major carrier in the US has switched to Google Jibe and for client side, google messages and they all have E2EE. Its a Apple problem, if they don't want to work with Google to use the opensource signal protocol, a solution that is already there. I want the GSMA to add an encryption protocol to the Universal Profile but there is a solution out there that most carriers have adopted which already has E2EE.No, it's about who hosts the servers, as I understand it. This makes it equally Google/Apple.
They might for practical reasons, like if they want to know if the other person can receive full quality videos or communicate/send stuff via internet. It would be helpful if the RCS bubble was a different color.Literally nobody is going to be asking this.
Point me to any Google statement that says they do NOT have any way to access to the encryption keys, even in response to a national security letter.Why do some of you people insist on making stupid comments. The messages are E2EE meaning google does not have the security key to snoop into your messages no more than Apple has the key to open iMessage.
![]()
SMS has both security flaws and is essentially featureless. No one is forcing a company to "destroy it's ecosystem" because nothing is changing for iPhone users communicating with other iPhone users. "Why is Google so keen on using iOS services?" What does that even mean? Google isn't using any iOS services here. "It makes no sense at all." Maybe that's because you don't seem to understand what all this means. Not trying to be mean, just basing that on your comment.SMS already exists for communicating with people on Android. Forcing a company to destroy it's ecosystem because it's better than a rival's is wrong as it stifles innovation. Why take incentive away to create better products? Apple doesn't have dominance in smartphone volumes, Google does. Why is Google so keen on using iOS services? It makes no sense at all.
It IS only Universal Profile. So, even if Android fans aren’t going “NOOO WE DIDNT WANT THIS”, Google certainly is!cant wait for android fans to go “NOOO WE DIDNT WANT THIS”