It better have a special version of Siri built in.
Tesla doesn't occupy the luxury market at all, fair enough they get into the more expensive side but they don't provide luxurious options; no quality interiors, no quality paint jobs, no luxury carpets, terrible ride quality for a luxury segment. As someone said before they had first to market advantage, and are an electricity infrastructure company first and then manufacture cars. Heck even the exterior isn't luxury to anyone who actually ever bought into the luxury segment. Luxury isn't defined by how much money something costs, the moment that becomes the criteria you know the tacky people have arrived...Definitely for the Luxury market. I do not see Apple focusing on mainstream. It all depends on how it is marketed. If this is for transport only then driving, then $100,000 is nothing. This would be sent as a taxi services as well as to Uber.
With Tesla, Porshe and Lucid currently occupying the Luxury market, Apple will not have any advantage. Plus, with Tesla vehicles ranging from $46,000 to $165,000 there no competition.
I think an EV from Apple will be small and meant to charge at home for daily commutes, and this will be priced lower than everyone expects.
Good luck. The auto market is a competitive business.
A car is such a distraction. They have their hands in too many things. Go back to the basics and innovate.
Nah, don't agree at all. There were other devices about that had all the same functions the iPhone provided; Nokia N95/E65, Blackberry, Motorola A1000, and the HTC Dream was about to be released...Apply didn't offer anything no other OEM was offering, but what they did offer was just way way better. Removed the lock-in with network providers, proper capacitive screens and good integration with good stock applications that were user friendly...When the iPhone came out, it was something no other OEM was offering. It was not a new mobile phone as such, but more of a smart device for personal communication purposes: lean - clean - flexible - versatile... disruptive.
Damn that interior is ugly and so not luxurious...
$100K isn't the problem, its a bit the mid-market price now for a new half decent EV but won't get you anything luxurious to be honest...
Tesla doesn't occupy the luxury market at all, fair enough they get into the more expensive side but they don't provide luxurious options; no quality interiors, no quality paint jobs, no luxury carpets, terrible ride quality for a luxury segment. As someone said before they had first to market advantage, and are an electricity infrastructure company first and then manufacture cars. Heck even the exterior isn't luxury to anyone who actually ever bought into the luxury segment. Luxury isn't defined by how much money something costs, the moment that becomes the criteria you know the tacky people have arrived...
I don't see it. This feels like something you do because you spend too much time thinking about whether you could and not enough time thinking about whether you should.