Electric cars are already more significant than hybrids or diesels and are rapidly approaching the point where they overtake gas powered cars - already 1 in 6 cars sold in October 2022 were electric.
In September 2022, the world's top selling vehicles (electrics in bold) were:
1. Tesla Model Y (113K sales)
2. Toyota Corolla (93K)
3. Toyota RAV4 (72K)
4. Tesla Model 3 (69K)
5. Ford F-Series (61K)*
6. Toyota Camry (54K)
7. Honda CRV (49K)
8. Chevy Silverado (48K)
9. BYD Song (46K)
10. RAM Pick Up (45K)
* Ford just started selling an electric version, the Lightning. Monthly sales so far are 2500. They also have an electric Mustang, the Mach-E, which accounts for 2/3s of all Mustang sales.
I agree. In fact, I am having trouble believing any of the hype. Any time a company steps this far outside of their realm of competence, it is usually a disaster. Corporate history is full of examples of successful companies that see the need to 'expand' beyond their core products, and usually (read "almost always") totally destroy then abandon their expensive purchase or merger. (Note: not talking about Google - that is a given with them). Apple has as much rational need to make a car as a submarine.Apple is so far from releasing a car, that these rumors are beyond ridiculous. They don't even have prototype, let alone factories, service centers, trained employees or any experience or know-how for manufacturing something as big and as different as a complete vehicle. Even if Apple take over an existing car OEM, it will take them 10 years at least to deliver first units.
Nuclear power is not cost effective. The reactors are too expensive to build relative to the amount of energy they produce. Building out the grid = renewables. And you'll also have improved hydrogen fuel cell technology in the future.if we build new power plants to generate the power for charging and replace and expand the electrical grid and rethink using nuclear for power generation, I would still not use an electric car.
Long distance, impractical, definitely. If for anything else but not enough chargers, but you're right about the grid. A hybrid works better for long distance.I really do not believe that electric cars will be useful for long range driving with their limited charge and range. if we build new power plants to generate the power for charging and replace and expand the electrical grid and rethink using nuclear for power generation, I would still not use an electric car. the time it takes to recharge makes long distance travel impractical. in the really cold climate of the northern states and Canada along with the flooding and storms of the southern and coastal states, they really are not practical at all. at 100K starting price you have eliminated over 90% of the population so this is a niche product that will cost billions to attempt to make it practical to a small extent. (someone had to say this)
I don't think that's a conspiracy theory. Other automotive companies didn't have much reason to invest in electric at the time. They were doing fine with what they were offering. So they sat back and watched how it worked out.I have a conspiracy theory that the automotive people wanted Tesla to put out the first all-electric vehicles to see how us, the common people, would take to it and if it was successful then everyone else would take to it
You talk about believe, some of us talk from experience. This summer holiday we've done 4K Km across 9 countries in our EV. No problems at all. What matters in such case more than the charge/range of the vehicle is the unit of measure that is Poronkusema.I really do not believe that electric cars will be useful for long range driving with their limited charge and range.
Another word for that; codswallop. By the time you've dealt with poronkusema it's already fully charged.if we build new power plants to generate the power for charging and replace and expand the electrical grid and rethink using nuclear for power generation, I would still not use an electric car. the time it takes to recharge makes long distance travel impractical.
Funny that as some of the greatest adoption rates are in Norway, Sweden and Finland. The climate is clearly not the problem, so what is so different there? Is it perhaps lack of government investment and people willingness?in the really cold climate of the northern states and Canada along with the flooding and storms of the southern and coastal states, they really are not practical at all.
Nearly all new technologies and innovation commences at the top end of the market, but actually nowadays $100K really isn't the top end of the market. It truly isn't that special or unique segment.at 100K starting price you have eliminated over 90% of the population so this is a niche product that will cost billions to attempt to make it practical to a small extent. (someone had to say this)
There will be no disruption, Apple isn't making a car 🙄Say what you want about the price, but this thing is going to have – trusting Apple – a multitude of smaller features that are of the "of course! (why hasn't anyone designed that feature this way before)" type.
I can't wait.
Even if I can't afford one (initially?), the knock-on / disruptive effects this product will have on the industry as a whole will improve travel for a great many people, myself included.
When did Apple ever announce a price much less a car? Stop being disappointed for something that isn't real....So generous of Apple to lower the price from 120 000$ to 100 000$ so us peasants can afford it. At this price point, it's definitely a bargain
Another fan of The Busy World of Richard Scarry, eh? Say no more...Turn the Canoo into a giant apple and we'll talk.
MagSafe would be perfect for those people who forget things.............MagSafe that placed and doesn't need cords...... I would say a wireless pad but I don't want to upset people
There will be no disruption, Apple isn't making a car 🙄
I agree. In fact, I am having trouble believing any of the hype. Any time a company steps this far outside of their realm of competence, it is usually a disaster. Corporate history is full of examples of successful companies that see the need to 'expand' beyond their core products, and usually (read "almost always") totally destroy then abandon their expensive purchase or merger. (Note: not talking about Google - that is a given with them). Apple has as much rational need to make a car as a submarine.
Steve Jobs says he finally cracked the code when it came to the TV...Oh good, I can use this to bring home one of those Apple-branded all-in-one TV sets (with built-in screen) that Gurman for years insisted were right around the corner![]()
And the code was to make it without a display, and that it could connect to any TV.Steve Jobs says he finally cracked the code when it came to the TV...
Add another zero to the chamois and I think you'll be spot on with pricing.If past behavior is any indication, the $100k version will have only 8Gb of memory and a passenger-side door that can only be opened from the outside. An actually usable configuration will be at least $150k…plus truly committed owners will also want the $750 car washing/drying chamois.
;-)
For $100,000 I can take public transport every day for 100+ years.
Don’t need to pay for upgrades on top.
Don’t need to pay for years insurance on top.
Don’t need to pay for repairs on top.
Don’t need to worry about traffic accidents.
Can sit on many seats.
Meet lots of interesting strangers.
Bump into friends.