If an app hasn't been updated for a year, it needs to go. That would clear out a sh*t ton of useless crap.
If the app still works leave it. There are plenty of old games that work just fine and haven't been updated for years.
If an app hasn't been updated for a year, it needs to go. That would clear out a sh*t ton of useless crap.
Yeah, I've worked on apps where people still use older iPhones or iPads for e.g. book reading apps. You don't need the latest and greatest hardware to read books. That's why people still use old devices and old versions of apps. What Apple needs to do is allow you to search for apps that only support the iOS version you are running. e.g. fix their search![]()
If I were Eddie, I would set the cutoff at 6/6 Plus support. If you still haven't gotten that down by now you don't deserve to be in the app store
Should charge developers $99 per app/year even for free apps, then they will rethink app quality instead of quantity.
Not sure anybody posted about this earlier, but at around noon today, the 50-character app title limit became active in the search algorithm ... basically, Apple truncated app names to 50 characters.
People don't seem to realize that it's very annoying and time consuming to have to update an app simply because a new version of iOS was released. It's pretty ridiculous to expect a developer to update an app every year for that reason alone. In the beginning iOS development was fun, there were only one or two screen sizes you had to deal with. But now there are multiple screen sizes and multiple resolutions for image files (@2x @3x), fragmentation is just as bad on iOS as it is on Android, if not worse.
Not sure anybody posted about this earlier, but at around noon today, the 50-character app title limit became active in the search algorithm ... basically, Apple truncated app names to 50 characters.
If an app works as designed but has not been updated for a year, lets say a calculator app then there is no reason for it to be removed.If an app hasn't been updated for a year, it needs to go. That would clear out a sh*t ton of useless crap.
Nope it does not.
It's not Eddy, but Phil's responsibility.If I were Eddie, I would set the cutoff at 6/6 Plus support. If you still haven't gotten that down by now you don't deserve to be in the app store
How in the world can't you devise a search system for 2 million records that doesn't allow queries for system version, author, subject, screen size, 32/64 bit ??Search works fine.
I used an iPhone 3GS as an iPod for years. Works absolutely fine to play music and audiobooks. There are basically no apps available anymore; that's mostly because at some point developers stop supporting devices, _and as a developer, you can't leave an old version on the store together with a new one_. Would be nice if say an iPhone 4 owner was shown the last version that runs on an iPhone 4, and probably will run on that phone forever, while owners of newer phones will be shown the newer version.They could either be recycled for raw materials, depending on the contents. If they are still functional then they may go to third world markets, by now those devices can be "rooted" aka jailbroken and able to run cracked software. The means of an official marketplace for apps is not in the question, I assure you that.
Absolutely true, one button moved and some people need major retraining.Do you know hard it is to train some teachers to use tech like that? Those apps need less updates. I don't care if it's just a pallet swap or a resolution update it cost the school to reteach how to use it. More to change platforms if we can't download the app to new devices.
or maybe the developer is busy writing so many other apps, he or she can't get to their own? Stop complaining. You probably know nothing about software development.
Wow that's half the app store. No seriously, any app that is not updated within the last 1 year should be automatically removed. I'm so sick of old apps that don't function well with OS changes.
It's not Eddy, but Phil's responsibility.
Since 9 months, he hasn't done anything other than introducing "Sponsored search results".
He'd better start from scratch to clean up this terrible, unmaintained mess.
[doublepost=1472803268][/doublepost]
How in the world can't you devise a search system for 2 million records that doesn't allow queries for system version, author, subject, screen size, 32/64 bit ??
(but hey, there were busy getting a Twitter account...)
BS. If a developer cannot update, or hasn't updated an app for years he is not a proper developer. Maybe you know nothing about software development.
I see what you did there. Exactly 50 characters!What kind of app needs 50 characters for its name?
That's too crude a timeframe. If we applied that to Apple's product line we'd have empty stores. Maybe older than three years is more reasonable.If an app hasn't been updated for a year, it needs to go. That would clear out a sh*t ton of useless crap.
Except sometimes when you're not expecting it.Nope it does not.
I am still using an app daily that hasn't been updated since 2010. It still provides the same functionality as it did back then. I almost certainly could find a current app with the same functionality, but transferring the data from the old to the new app would be very difficult.Good. Apps that haven't been updated in years should no longer be on the App Store. It's obvious the developer doesn't care about the app anymore.
I'm all for eliminate outdated stuff on the Appstore, but only if they also do the same in the Apple Store