Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Unsure why there is an argument about pronunciation/spelling.

Aluminum is the older form of the word.
Alumininium was written shortly after to better fit with other metal names.
BOTH are widely accepted as still correct.
 
Not really, the 3.5" was a fairly common screen size among the PDAs. There were even great apps (Office suites, drawing apps, fully 3D accelerated games, physics simulations, companion apps to all kinds of professional hardware), GPS receivers with full blown navigation apps, bluetooth, GSM and data connections, complete web browsers, all atop a full fledged operating system. It's just that those devices weren't targeted at (and marketed to) the consumer market.

Yep, Windows CE (not Windows Mobile) devices used by enterprises (and some consumer PDAs) even had full Internet Explorer on them (not the gimped Pocket IE).

In 2000, I was remotely surfing the web on my HP Jornada CE device which had a landscape 640x240 screen, via a cellular CF card. It was great, and because that was the width most websites were made for back then, there was almost no need for horizontal scrolling.

It was the internet in your pocket, seven years before the iPhone. (I mostly used it to put in last second bids on eBay while out and around. This was before AuctionSniper.)

By the time the 3.5" 480x320 iPhone came out in 2007, there had already been over two dozen 3.5+" screen smartphones available since 1999, mostly using Windows Pocket PC Phone. Even WVGA "retina" resolution screens, albeit 3", were available at the time the iPhone went on sale.

Here's some large touch screen voice/data capable devices from the past:

screen_evolution.png


Interestingly, that Samsung Nexio touchscreen device... which had full IE / internet five years before the iPhone came out... was almost the same height and width as their Galaxy Note series that came out years later. It was only sold in Korea, I think.
 
Last edited:
I don't really care about Stainless Steel or Aluminiiium (or however you spell it) I want a phone that doesn't need a case to protect it. I can't see the point of a making a super thin thing only to have to slap on a bulky protective, mostly ugly, case
 



Apple is expected to adopt a forged stainless steel crafting process for its glass-encased "iPhone 8", rather than use traditional aluminum CNC machining.

Taiwanese sources from the upstream supply chain apparently confirmed the transition on Tuesday, according to DigiTimes, with component orders expected to be shared between Foxconn and U.S.-based Jabil.

iphoneconceptimage.jpg

Edge-to-edge iPhone concept image via ConceptsiPhone
The stainless steel process was last used by Apple in the iPhone 4s handset, which encased a "glass sandwich" chassis in two CNC-machined steel bands. However, every succeeding iPhone iteration has used aluminum because the alloy offers heightened structural rigidity while remaining relatively lightweight.

Supply chain sources said the cost of the forging process is between 30 percent and 50 percent cheaper than the current unibody CNC machine process, while quality control is also more stable. Despite the switch, Apple is expected to continue outsourcing orders for internal structural parts to Catcher Technology and Casetek, because the stainless steel bezel will require further refinement using traditional CNC machining.

Today's report supports recent rumors indicating at least one model of iPhone this year will have a redesigned all-glass body with a steel frame housing an edge-to-edge, curved OLED display. Jony Ive has wanted to introduce an iPhone that looks like a single sheet of glass for several years, and glass is also necessary if Apple wants to introduce wireless charging. If an edge-to-edge display does feature, the home button and Touch ID fingerprint sensor would be embedded in the display.

Apple is said to be planning to position the OLED iPhone 8 as a "Premium" model that will perhaps be sold alongside standard flat display 4.7, 5, and 5.5-inch iPhone models, but details relating to size, configurations, and materials used remain sketchy.

Article Link: Apple to Forge 'iPhone 8' Chassis Frame From Stainless Steel Instead of Aluminum
Ceramic! Glass ceramic!
 
I don't really care about Stainless Steel or Aluminiiium (or however you spell it) I want a phone that doesn't need a case to protect it. I can't see the point of a making a super thin thing only to have to slap on a bulky protective, mostly ugly, case
Go clear and thin protective cases. Admire the design while protecting the device.
 
Glad to hear this. Sounds more like the iPhone 4 which was the best design they ever did. The current iPhones are really the worst as far as looks aside from the jet black. Also it's the most slippery mess of a device. First iPhone I had to put a case on. Used my 3G, 4S and 5S all without cases and they held up great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vicklouisville
I don't buy the "same weight" claim. If so, why do all car manufacturers opt in for aluminum body for lightweight cars? And why did Apple go for an aluminum body in the first case for the iPhone 5, if it is not lighter?
Cars are not stainless steel. "Strength" in materials is not a single property. Hardness, tensile limit, sheer, modulus of elasticity, ductility; depending on the application steel can be lighter or do things impossible with aluminum. Or aluminum can be "stronger" with less weight. Its an engineering design problem not a simple "one is always lighter or stronger" issue.
 
I just keep thinking this is gonna be another "iPhone 5" level of disappointment when they actually announce it. (Ya know... the whole year we kept getting amazing and really cool "leaks" and concepts, only to come face to face with the iPhone 4S). Either way I'm upgrading from a 6S+ for the camera improvements so I hope it's amazing. But I will never forget that year, we had 1 or 2 leaks of the actual device, and each time everybody just said "no Apple will go WAY bigger and better than that...", didn't we have a leak a little bit ago that said the device will just be the 7S?


LOL that's why these blogs call Rumor.... I have owned and used every gen iPhone and I don't have any complaints every time I upgrade .. I enjoy the new UI and new features ... i keep my expectation low ... lol


we do not reliaze .. how much iphone have a impact in our daily life... until we use another device ... it happened with me.. I lost my iphone 7 and while waiting on replacement I was using X device ( I do not want to name )

and my life was upside down.... I mean it ... I was missing my calendar.. my CORP email .. my icloud mails ... imessage... controlling my home devices ... checking traffic while driving ... my baby safari .. which is monster powerful compare to other device browser ...
and most IMP ... while I am dropping my 3 years to day care .. who use to watch you tube from my iphone while driving ... threw that phone on my face as he could not play his kids video ... darn .....

oh Gosh I mean it..... and minute I got my replacement .. I was so inpatient to restore my iphone like a 4 month baby crying for milk....

I missed my iphone for those 5 days ... thanks Apple for making me handicapped... that I can't live without your product ...
 
Unsure why there is an argument about pronunciation/spelling.

Aluminum is the older form of the word.
Alumininium was written shortly after to better fit with other metal names.
BOTH are widely accepted as still correct.
"Alumininium" isn't even a word... "Aluminum" is the American spelling and pronunciation, and "aluminium" is the British spelling and pronunciation.

Anyways, I would be very happy with a steel iPhone. There seems to be a craze in the market with lighter phones, but I'd rather have a dense phone that feels more substantial. At these sizes, higher weight may also make the phone easier to hold.
 
Any new iPhone borrowing design queues from iPhone 4/4S is a plus in my book. By far the best looking iPhone ever made IMO. I regret selling mine.
 
Apple is said to be planning to position the OLED iPhone 8 as a "Premium" model that will perhaps be sold alongside standard flat display 4.7, 5, and 5.5-inch iPhone models, but details relating to size, configurations, and materials used remain sketchy.

It's not enough. I want to be able to choose my display size down to the tenth of an inch in that range and pick any color of the rainbow.

/s
 
It would be amazing if they would realize an iphone as big as the old iphone 4-4/S, but with the display as big as the entire phone. They would reach iphone 7 screen dimension but make a phone as portable and usable as Jobs wanted it to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moonjelly
I hope this comes true. I've hated the designs of every iPhone after the 5S obviously not including the SE. If they basically made a 16:9 display iPhone 4, with smaller chin and forehead bezels (iPhone 4's were yuge), that would be amazing.

For God's sake too, give some attention to people who don't use phones as media streaming devices. I still think the display size and chassis of the 5/5S/SE is perfect. Apple really needs a 3-size approach for all its products. It has it for the MacBooks, is rumored to have it for the iPads and now needs to implement it for phones. Keep the current iPhone display sizes because of course others like them, but just make a smaller 4-inch display which is just scaled down and NOT gimped spec-wise, I hate when Apple punish you because you don't want the biggest phone size.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.