Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The 'complex setup process' will also be a fair bit of theatre to make the sales process feel like a true 'service'. Harder to sell USD 3k+ devices looking for a problem if you just pick up a box off the shelf and walk out. It has to feel like an experience.
 
Everyone in here: "Nobody will spend thousands on something so unnecessary."

Also everyone in here: "Yeah, I upgrade my iPhone Pro Max every single year. I don't need it, it's just like a tradition at this point. I have the money to spend, who cares? And my M2 MBP is definitely getting replaced when the M3 MBPs drop!"
 
Yup... Still waiting for the feature to copy texts from photos over here.
Every iOS user can enable it in Settings.

It just won't read the text in photos unless the text in the photo is in one of the supported languages, like English.

But it's still very useful even if it doesn't support your native language.
 
Secretive? 🤔 I bet Apple invites their workers into a room one at a time, clunks them over the head! And then replaces them with look-alike AI robots 😂
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NMBob
Probably teaching staff how to install and initialize the Hypno-Toad Mode in the hidden Subliminal Mode Settings for the demo models in-store.

More Apple hubris, thinking they can sell Bottled Reality to a large enough audience, although this might just be selling another kind of Bottled Reality in the UK sense ...
 
The same was said about the 1998 iMac (too expensive, too limited, no legacy ports, no disc drive), the iPhone when it first entered a category awash in phone models and established players, the (said to be too limited) iPad…

It’s been said about pretty much every new Apple product.

Apple just defies gravity, man!
It’s all not the same.

Anything selling for $3500 is too expensive to be a hit
 
  • Like
Reactions: Surf Monkey
Those who saw the LOTR movies, might have seen a early prototype of the Apple Vision Pro.

Or was it the Palanthir ?

Again, I am just joking. c")
 

Attachments

  • Secret.jpeg
    Secret.jpeg
    43.8 KB · Views: 57
I really hope the AVP is shareable even if I have to buy different prescription lenses. I probably won't buy one if everyone in my family can't use it.
I highly doubt it, given none of the software indicates it will be. iOS doesn't have multi-user, neither does iPadOS. The best it will get is a guest mode for now. $2000 iPad's don't have it, so my guess is Apple will be fine with not having it on the Vision Pro, especially given how you need to adjust the head strap and lenses to swap to a different user.
 
they’re making people who already work for them apply and interview for a chance to fly out to get trained to sell this dumb thing they made. i worked at apple retail for a long time, and they did psychotic bozo stuff all the time, but this is way up there. what an absolutely terrible company.
 
This. It’s Tim Cook’s last hurrah. His baby.
And that’s why apple is already looking at making a MUCH more affordable version. This stinks of the gold first gen Apple Watch.
The $3500 price tag just isn’t gonna fly. When it costs a months mortgage on a $750,000 home it’s gonna be a bad time.
Sure it will fail as a toy. But the primary customers will probably be people who want it for work. And work expenses continue even in recessions.

I doubt it will ever get much cheaper.
 
Everyone in here: "Nobody will spend thousands on something so unnecessary."

Also everyone in here: "Yeah, I upgrade my iPhone Pro Max every single year. I don't need it, it's just like a tradition at this point. I have the money to spend, who cares? And my M2 MBP is definitely getting replaced when the M3 MBPs drop!"

The price is just one amongst a mountain of blatantly obvious problems with the device.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: R2DHue
The same was said about the 1998 iMac (too expensive, too limited, no legacy ports, no disc drive), the iPhone when it first entered a category awash in phone models and established players, the (said to be too limited) iPad…

It’s been said about pretty much every new Apple product.

Apple just defies gravity, man!

Magical thinking won’t make this ugly helmet a hit.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: R2DHue and nt5672
Apple staff: put the helmet upon, sir. No, dont piss into it, even by mistake. It is expensive and can break. Ok, do u see you me now? No? U have to turn it on. Yes like that. You can say also “Siri! Turn me on”. No, no sir, not turn me in. Fine. Now u see me? Like in halo? Yes? This is our Apple aura. And it has 7 colors. See? That is our vision pro. Now you can turn it off. See, no halo now? Magical, isn”t it? Thank you sir, 3500.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Lioness~ and nt5672
I look forward to trying one of these myself, hoping it does key things demoed as well as they appeared in the WWDC demo. Access to a super-sized laptop screen anywhere I happen to go seems quite valuable to me. I hope it works well.
I will never stand in line to try one of these. Not sure I'd even be willing to try it in public. Maybe in a backroom someplace?
 
I highly doubt it, given none of the software indicates it will be. iOS doesn't have multi-user, neither does iPadOS. The best it will get is a guest mode for now. $2000 iPad's don't have it, so my guess is Apple will be fine with not having it on the Vision Pro, especially given how you need to adjust the head strap and lenses to swap to a different user.
iPadOS actually does support multi-user in education/enterprise when managed by an MDM. So theoretically that feature could be used in this version of the OS. We should not assume that "this" version of IOS will be exactly the same as what is on our iPads and phones.
 
I highly doubt it, given none of the software indicates it will be. iOS doesn't have multi-user, neither does iPadOS. The best it will get is a guest mode for now. $2000 iPad's don't have it, so my guess is Apple will be fine with not having it on the Vision Pro, especially given how you need to adjust the head strap and lenses to swap to a different user.
I agree with you, but one care dare to dream. A guest mode might be good enough to get me to buy, it all depends on the details, which we won't know until next year.
 
they’re making people who already work for them apply and interview for a chance to fly out to get trained to sell this dumb thing they made. i worked at apple retail for a long time, and they did psychotic bozo stuff all the time, but this is way up there. what an absolutely terrible company.
What's wrong with having to apply for a special position? I don't see anything wrong with it. The other option would be having each store manager pick the (lucky) sales person. This way seems better to me and I think most other people would agree. You obviously didn't enjoy working for apple so it's good you don't work there anymore. I hope you're happy wherever you're working now.
 
I know this is about sales training rumors, and I hate to veer so far from the subject, but I have to say it. Every couple of weeks I think maybe I've judged too harshly and this thing might actually catch on, but then I see a new picture of someone wearing it and I conclude all over again: this is going to be a train-wreck for Apple. It will be a high quality, well organized and funded train-wreck, but a train-wreck just the same.

I agree, but if we are wrong and this thing catches on like the iPhone did, it will change the world all over again. So go Apple make an amazing product and let’s see what’s happens, I want to feel like when I was a teen and had to make money somehow to get an iPod.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.