Yes, it is. At least according to the latest PCWorld survey.
http://www.pcworld.com/zoom?id=156450&page=1&zoomIdx=1
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple to Introduce Cheaper Macs?
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
http://www.pcworld.com/zoom?id=156450&page=1&zoomIdx=1
um according to that link, apple is worse than average in terms of having to have components replaced
That wasn't the statement though. This was: less defects then other products in the same category.
And you have a more accurate source? Thought not.Yeah, because a pcworld reader survey an accurate estimate of failure rates.
And you have a more accurate source? Thought not.
I didn't make any statement other than the fact that the link you posted was far from a reliable source.
What makes you feel that a survey from an industry leading magazine is not reliable?
I think his post history (in his brief 2 weeks as a member) makes his intentions in being here perfectly clear.
What do you consider a more reliable source then? Its FAR better than just taking a look at some forums and drawing a conclusion from there.
I have a feeling there's going to be some resistance against lowering prices from current Mac users.
I personally have no problems with it.
Why would anyone have a problem with lowering prices if they already own one? Are you talking buyers remorse for paying the more expensive price?
A perceived notion in the loss of quality for the most part.
You can't lump all Mac users as "hipster, trendsetters." I myself am quite utilitarian. As are many other users here.
It can be tough dealing with the flak elsewhere just for owning a Mac because I'm more productive under OS X.
Oh look a loaded rhetorical! Nothing says "I have no agenda" like setting up a scenario yourself then commenting on it.
Wow, another thread that will generate a thousand posts...
If you think about it - Apple's been kinda doing it already, with "clearance" Macs. They've also kept prices the same, and bumped the specs.
Instead of bumping the processor speed, memory, and hard drive space while keeping the price the same, why not just lower the price?
C'mon, how much hard drive space does one really need? We're entering the Tera-byte realm...
I'd like them to drop the price of the Mini's:
1/160 2.0 for $549 ($499 edu)
2/320 2.0 for $699 ($649 edu)
Clearance GMA950 Macs $399/$449
Same specs:
White MacBook, $899 ($849 edu)
Al MacBook, $1,099 ($1,049 edu)
etc. on MacBook Pros...
If you think about it - Apple's been kinda doing it already, with "clearance" Macs. They've also kept prices the same, and bumped the specs.
Instead of bumping the processor speed, memory, and hard drive space while keeping the price the same, why not just lower the price?
C'mon, how much hard drive space does one really need? We're entering the Tera-byte realm...
I'd like them to drop the price of the Mini's:
1/160 2.0 for $549 ($499 edu)
2/320 2.0 for $699 ($649 edu)
Clearance GMA950 Macs $399/$449
Same specs:
White MacBook, $899 ($849 edu)
Al MacBook, $1,099 ($1,049 edu)
etc. on MacBook Pros...
My friend posted about the iPhone scenario.
There's also a strong walled garden mentality as well. Your "investment" in the Mac experience will be sullied somehow if you spend less. "Corners had to be cut somewhere."
So they've dropped the lower end consumer iMac, slightly upgraded the MacMini and added larger hard drives and more RAM to make up for price increases on systems based on 2007 CPUs (not talking about the MacPro).
A 20" iMac for $899 would be £697.66 including VAT at the current exchange rate. The old model they dropped was £772 so without the education discount, they're just re-introducing a lower end system for a price people can afford. The ORIGINAL price.
This is like a cola company changing their flavour then bringing their old recipe back out again as NEW COLA when people don't like it.
If they're dropping the price of the firewire Macbook, that can only be a good thing, if it means a netbook for $599, I doubt people would pay that much for one unless they've done a wonder of size reduction and managed to squeeze the innards of the original Macbook Air into a system with a 10" screen and 1024 x 768 resolution.
A 20" iMac for $899 would be £697.66 including VAT at the current exchange rate. The old model they dropped was £772 so without the education discount, they're just re-introducing a lower end system for a price people can afford. The ORIGINAL price.
This is like a cola company changing their flavour then bringing their old recipe back out again as NEW COLA when people don't like it.
If they're dropping the price of the firewire Macbook, that can only be a good thing, if it means a netbook for $599, I doubt people would pay that much for one unless they've done a wonder of size reduction and managed to squeeze the innards of the original Macbook Air into a system with a 10" screen and 1024 x 768 resolution.
I was talking about his insistence that the "status symbol" value would be lost.
The thing about a price cut on macs is that corners would not have to be cut somewhere, assuming Apple would be ok with their profit margin dipping a bit.
Once again it is perception.
My MacBook is just a laptop to me but many of my peers and friends comment on how wealthy I must be or how cute my laptop is.
I can't budget in an iPhone though. Now that is a luxury for me.
I get that he sees macs as a status symbol, that doesnt make it a status symbol to everyone.
Apple plays off of that perception though and people buy into it.
It's just a computer and nothing more.
Really? I dont see that in any of the "get a mac" ads. Are there ads out that have apple saying your cooler if you own a mac?
i agree
i get comments like "ooooh you have a mac" all the time like its some exotic thing like a lambo
im like "yea i got one of those mac laptop things"