I've owned three 17" MBPs and I loathe the thought of having to go back to 15". That being said, if I can hook up a bigger Thunderbolt display, keyboard, & mouse and run the MBP closed, I'd consider it.
Apple believes LESS is MORE and not MORE is LESS.
Wait... This doesnt make sense.
That's just silly.
Apple does a lot of things that don't make technical sense, but they do them anyways for marketing purposes.
My 13" MBA is 1440x800. At 2-2.5 feet when on my lap, I cannot discern one pixel from another.
or at least not a third line with another 13" notebook. I would not mind the return of a line just called "MacBook" if they drop one of the other 13" ones (which they won't, they are selling very well)I hope we dont see ANOTHER line up of MacBooks
Firewire sometimes; Optical lots; Ethernet never.Ethernet, Firewire and Optical are just a hindrance to product design. They really need to just go. There's new technology today that comfortably replace these.
Unfortunately not everyone is eager to change so quickly. It'll happen eventually. Maybe when something much newer replaces the new technology, then people will finally let CD's go.
All my friends use the CD-drive argument for choosing the macbook pro. When I ask them what they use the CD drive for, they go blank. It's a psychological thing.
Doesn't Apple believe in keeping the number of choices low to avoid confusing the consumer?
This would add MORE models, which is precisely what Steve Jobs taught Apple to not do...
I was just about to comment on it. Was anyone else expecting a 13 with a GPU? Would be awesome if true, but I doubt it...No, it's not: it's 1440x900. That extra 100 pixels makes a big difference in usability, especially when most 15" PC laptops are 1366x768 (or the same resolution as the 11" MacBookAir).
As for whether it's a retina display, my calculations say that at 27" viewing distance, each pixel is just slightly under 1 arc minute (the theoretical threshold for Retina). The 11" at 26" is technically a Retina Display, but the same criteria.
Wouldn't it make more sense that the new ones would be the Pro machines and then the current 13" (and maybe the 15") MacBook Pro would just drop the Pro?
His claims aren't as crazy as they seem at first glance, they kept the 13" white macbook as a legacy model for quite some time, even gave it a "unibody" redesign. If Apple is branching into three lines, that's exactly what the Pro would be. A legacy model. Something Apple continues to sell, but not heavily advertised or discussed, and silently updated.
Right now Apple is selling "The new iPad" and the "iPad 2". I could see Apple releasing "The new Macbook" and keeping the "Macbook Pro" around until it stops selling well.
Like most people in the post, I've been sitting on my $2500 for months now waiting for them to release the wretched thing. But should I wait a little longer until Apple have finished their ludicrous machinations?