If you want to be right you can start with spelling "globally" and "fanaticism" correctly.
Nope, that's Apples jobs to fix AutoCorrect and make it work reliably in a dual language environment.
What they're making in the present has little to do with the problems pointed out about the future.
You pointed out nothing about the future. You're so-called problems are just things Apple always made different and became the biggest company doing so.
Apple is still reaping profits from Steve Jobs' baby. What happens when Apple has a "Windows ME" or "Vista" with an iPhone model?
That already happened with iOS 7. And the "Snow" and "Mountain" versions of OS X, that's their way of saying we screwed up last time let's change the name of Windows again.
The market is highly volatile and tablets are already starting to tank in general.
What are people using instead of tablets? Bigger iPhones, smaller MacBooks? Apple has you covered either way.
Oh, but we don't think of these things in the land of pretzels and beer now do we? (incidentally the only things I'll be thinking of when I'm in Germany next year).
You're excused nobody expected deeper knowledge from you. I'm surprised you didn't came up with Hitler.
Point out a single real innovation Apple has had in the past year other than pressure-sensitivity which has been available for ages in drawing tablets that Apple copied the idea from in reverse (i.e. make the trackpad sensitive rather than a drawing stylus).
How about a variable display scan rate, increased when using the pencil to further reduce lag, while maintaining battery life when not working with the pencil. Or a four speakers system with balanced sound depending on how you're holding the iPad Pro. You don't have to reinvent the wheel every year to be innovative. A Wacom graphics tablet is an input device to a PC. It's not a tablet computer in and off itself.
The Surface Book does something Apple's Macbook Pro cannot do and that is turn into a tablet and separate from its keyboard.
Something Apple's MacBook Pro chooses not to do. It is fine to be the best notebook it can be and doesn't pursue to be a hybrid of two other devices. It is Microsofts failure to establish a successful smartphone OS, which forces the old company to address the tablet market with hybrid devices.
Windows 10 supports a hybrid device. Apple hasn't even figured out how to make a touchscreen work in a Macbook.
Apple could start making hybrid devices any day, but Microsoft can't make real ARM-based tablets, because it doesn't have the support of third party app developers, developers, developers, developers, developers ...
Apple is copying Samsung more than Samsung is copying Apple these days. Talk about current profits all you want, but I'm looking at future products and Apple is falling behind.
No, it doesn't. Bigger screens was all Samsung had as a competitive advantage. Since the iPhone 6 Samsung saw several quarters with declining operating profits. And just now profits come back, not with selling their own phones, but with the production of more and more Apple-designed ARM chips.
Apple never did understand the importance of graphics hardware and gaming for that matter in OS X.
And since the Mac became the most profitable brand without gaming, we can conclude that raw graphics power isn't related to success in the market. Sorry to spoil your dreams. You're wrong again and can't win an argument.
Johnny Ive took a perfectly lovely GUI and turned it into a Kindergartner's dream (that's progress?)
Yes it is, first up nobody came up with another perfect looking UI, so UI design is kind of a strength of Apple. And then you can't stick with the old look forever, no matter how beautiful it is, at some point you have to modernize. Which went rather successful with OS X, not so with iOS.