Sorry, but I would and DO. Actually I'm getting a free ride on TV+ because I bought an iPhone last year, but I would pay for it regardless and when my first free year is up, for 5 bucks a month, I'm ON.Bundling of services people don’t want. As opposed to making the services more attractive. Sure that’ll fix it. Who in the right mind would pay for News or TV+?
Don't fully understand the anti-Apple News+ either. WSJ news, LA times and a host of magazines to scan plus a lot more for only 10 bucks a month. "The New Yorker" alone is almost worth the 10 bucks verses subscribing to the magazine. A whole host of magazines to scan.
My main pet pieve re News+ plus is the tease articles from the Washington Post that are only fully a available with a subscription.
The biggest problem with News+ is that it's very easy to spend too much time with all the content. I'm curious as to what could make the News+ more attractive unless it would cost less than 10 bucks or be free.
Last edited: