Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have macs. don't judge people by your prejudice. someone like you exactly like Apple. you like restriction, right? I have a right to post what I want to say here. you can't just talk like that. you are so unthinkable.

inigoo.jpg


"I do not think that word means what you think it does..."
 
This is a non issue... Nothing to see here folks...

Apple is just trying to keep the house clean.

If you need Java and Flash, then go download them. The websites will tell you what you need and where to get them if you don't have them installed.
 
What is Oracle's business model for profiting from the development of Java on the Mac, and how has Apple's move changed that?

Fine questions. I used to work at Sun, and at the time I couldn't figure out their business model for profiting from Java. All I know is that, whatever meager value Java is to Oracle, that value derives from Java's installed base. And Mac's move changes (eventually) the installed base unless Oracle steps in to fill the void.

Well, I did say in my post that its no big deal.

Its just the attitude - "if I don't need it then neither does any one else".

An attitude that was nowhere in my post. Being in favor of not having an old version of flash pre-installed is not the same as saying "no one needs flash." Nowhere did I say "I don't need flash," nowhere did I say "you don't need flash," and nowhere did I say "if I don't need it, you don't need it." You're making stuff up.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8A293 Safari/6531.22.7)



You don't even know what you are talking about. If you don't buy apple because you don't want to have to install flash yourself what os do you run? Windows requires you to do it yourself, same with Linux so I'm not sure what you are complaining about.

Are you too arrogant to actually read the article or did you just assume based on the title that apple completely blocked flash? Because that is not true at all, in fact all they've done is quit bundling it with the os, just like ms does.

Also if you hate apple so much why are you even on these boards? Just to troll?

These threads just prove people on the Internet don't know how to read. NOWHERE does it say apple blocked flash but somehow everyone has to get their panties in a bunch over it. Maybe MR and engadget should give up posting these retarded misleading article titles so these stupid fanboy arguments can end. When will people understand that if you dontvlike the way a company does something you have other options. If you want flash on your mobile, you have other options. Nobody forces you to buy apple so give it up.

it's obvious you are the same Apple fanboy who just think if someone has different opinion is not acceptable, huh? again, don't judge me. you don't know me. I have macs, have used them for 15 years. I know very well about mac, apple. requirement? I don't think you don't know what you talking as well. I don't need to tell you the whole miserable apple hisotry in the past. now, they became arrogant because fortunately market share in US has grown over 20%. then they decided to change situation? it's only in US. Apple was nothing back until 2000. windows is still dominated for world market. don't tell me what to do. it's not even 5% share for world market (mac business). they maybe change US. but can't change the world. there are more reasons why. but I don't have time to explain now. just google it. by the way, don't pretend that you know or better than anyone here. worthless.
 
Adobe could win the crusade against flash by simply shipping a version of flash that doesn't repeatedly crash the browser, or suck up all CPU usage. It really is that simple.

And they should call this new version HTML5 :D
/jk
 
how do PC's do it?

What fraction of PC's currently come from the factory with Flash and Java installed?
 
If you need Java and Flash, then go download them. The websites will tell you what you need and where to get them if you don't have them installed.

But "normal" people won't know they need Flash, they'll just see "Missing Plug-in". Apple should at least be more specific and include a link to Adobe's Flash website.

012526-mba-no-flash-fix-rm-eng_500.jpg
 
I applaud them on this. Regardless, I always from time to time update flash on my own through Adobe's website, just because Apple does not always deliver the latest flash update when issuing an update to the their OS.
 
But "normal" people won't know they need Flash, they'll just see "Missing Plug-in". Apple should at least be more specific and include a link to Adobe's Flash website.

Why is it Apples responsibility to promote Adobe? Apple promoting Flash is promoting a less stable browser. If a web designer requires a third party plug in, they have the responsibility to inform the user, not Apple.
 
It shouldn't, my 1.4ghz celeron processor runs flash fine, of course it was a $500 Windows PC, so YMMV ;)

The Mac version of Flash supplied by Adobe is far worse then the PC version. So, yes, our mileage does vary.
That's why you so much support for flash disablers for OS X (going back well before any of Job's statements on Flash).
 
This is a non issue... Nothing to see here folks...

Apple is just trying to keep the house clean.

If you need Java and Flash, then go download them. The websites will tell you what you need and where to get them if you don't have them installed.

And once again, where can I download Java? Can you please provide the link?

Sigh.
 
But "normal" people won't know they need Flash, they'll just see "Missing Plug-in". Apple should at least be more specific and include a link to Adobe's Flash website.

012526-mba-no-flash-fix-rm-eng_500.jpg

Its up to the web developer to do that. They can tell if you computer has flash on it, and it doesn't they can put a link to get it...
 
Today there is no link, but today EVERY Mac has already Java. Stop inventing issues.

Ok. How about this. I have a rack of 6 XServes running JBoss application servers. I have to make a decision about upgrading by the end of the year.

Should I get new XServes? Or switch to HP? Is that not a real issue?
 
I'm eagerly awaiting Adobes strongly worded and very snarky press release to address this development.
 
Oh well, Flash is now just one more thing I'll have to download when I buy a new Mac. Not a big deal right now. If Jobs and company want to shake their fists at Adobe and try to "hurt" them by not pre-installing Flash, that's not my problem.

One of the reasons I went to an Android phone from the iPhone 4 was because I wanted the choice whether or not to install Flash. If the day ever comes that Apple makes it either impossible or too much of a hassle to install Flash on their computers (as they have on their phones), I will be searching for a new computer brand.
 
Ok. How about this. I have a rack of 6 XServes running JBoss application servers. I have to make a decision about upgrading by the end of the year.

Should I get new XServes? Or switch to HP? Is that not a real issue?

Contact RedHat and ask if OSX will be a supported platform in next year. If they say yes, your good to go. If not go to HP.
 
I'm eagerly awaiting Adobes strongly worded and very snarky press release to address this development.

Well the last time Apple fell behind the current version of Flash Adobe pointed the finger. Frankly this should make Adobe happy.
 
Fine questions. I used to work at Sun, and at the time I couldn't figure out their business model for profiting from Java. All I know is that, whatever meager value Java is to Oracle, that value derives from Java's installed base. And Mac's move changes (eventually) the installed base unless Oracle steps in to fill the void.

In that case, it would seem that the MacOS port of Java is headed in the same direction as Flash. As long as Apple was accepting responsibility for Java on the Mac there was reason to believe that it was a quality product, even if it was a bit behind. In the absence of competitive pressure, profit motive, or pride of ownership what incentive does Oracle have to do a good job with MacOS Java?
 
The java thing worries me, though I assume oracle will announce their support of it soon. Flash on the other hand is not a big deal. I'm sure there's some political reasoning behind doing this (I.e. Steves hatred of flash), but it's easy enough to install yourself, and this helps clear up any security concerns people had about macs shipping with outdated versions of flash. I remember there was a lot of talk when snow leopard first came out and included an outdated flash plugin with critical security flaws). Flash is not an apple product, and therefore, they shouldn't need to worry about including it out of the box.

Will it be an annoyance to network administrators? Probably. Should the average consumer care? No.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.