I really hope this rumour is true, I need a new iMac in the worst way and have been holding out for an update. New AMD chips would be nice. And so would some nicer storage capacities. Here's hoping for an update!
No the MacBook Pro cant be referred to as the retina MacBook Pro forever. It made sense when the line existed alongside the non-retina model, but it doesn't really make sense now.
Except the need of 46 architects in my example.It was introduced at a time when Apple needed to differentiate themselves from the rest of the computer market and at a time when consumers were just getting on board with the whole Internet thing and a lot of people were not very computer savvy. The idea of a Mac that you could just pull out of the box and get up and running and on the Internet without connecting components and a lot of other hassles was genius at the time. I remember working with older women at the time who loved their iMacs for exactly the reason I just described. It was simple. Remember how it brought along USB which was easy to use and dumped other, more complicated connectivity (anyone else have SCSI-inspiried PTSD?) How about serial ports? Anyone want to go back to those days?
The world has moved on. The iMac is a quaint anachronism now. Consumers have gotten significantly more sophisticated about computers and equipment and the Internet. The all-in-one so-easy-even-grandma-can-do-it is no longer serving any real need.
I'm not sure what you mean by "they do exist alongside each other for years" but to explain my point, the retina MacBook Pros are just MacBook Pros. They had to be named 'MacBook Pro with Retina display" because it existed alongside the non-retina model. Although that is true as of today (the non-retina is sold online), it won't be after the new models are released.Why? They do exist alongside each other for years.
Pros/Cons of Option 2: 5K iMac and keep my 12-inch MacBook
Cons
- Need to manage multiple Macs, using semi-unreliable services like Back to my Mac and iCloud to unify the file systems
- Less powerful portable
If they don't release a new MBA though.... they blew it.
And your point being?
It's never easy to balance aesthetics with functionality, and Apple arguably did the best they could. The alternative would be to put the charging port in front, and break the smooth glass surface of the mouse.
It's arguably the most elegant solution there is to an inelegant problem.
I'm not sure what you mean by "they do exist alongside each other for years" but to explain my point, the retina MacBook Pros are just MacBook Pros. They had to be named 'MacBook Pro with Retina display" because it existed alongside the non-retina model. Although that is true as of today (the non-retina is sold online), it won't be after the new models are released.
It was introduced at a time when Apple needed to differentiate themselves from the rest of the computer market and at a time when consumers were just getting on board with the whole Internet thing and a lot of people were not very computer savvy. The idea of a Mac that you could just pull out of the box and get up and running and on the Internet without connecting components and a lot of other hassles was genius at the time. I remember working with older women at the time who loved their iMacs for exactly the reason I just described. It was simple. Remember how it brought along USB which was easy to use and dumped other, more complicated connectivity (anyone else have SCSI-inspiried PTSD?) How about serial ports? Anyone want to go back to those days?
The world has moved on. The iMac is a quaint anachronism now. Consumers have gotten significantly more sophisticated about computers and equipment and the Internet. The all-in-one so-easy-even-grandma-can-do-it is no longer serving any real need.
Probably THE most ignorant post I have ever read here. Congratulations.So basically. Apple should:
a) Drop the imac
b) Drop the mini
c) Drop the pro
and
d) Just create a farking mini tower/mini desktop that is small enough to fit nearly all the same purposes as the mini, and can be configured and updated with either the power of a imac or a pro.
It's obvious that Apple is too incompetent at this point to keep multiple desktop computing product lines updated and in sync. Now is the time to make this move if there ever was one.
Seriously, you think this would be a NO BRAINER. One product could totally replace three products, and it would not need to be updated nearly as often. Heck they could design a motherboard that could have easily replaceable CPU's and graphics cards etc. Some people would buy updates for those every year instead of holding onto their systems for several years at a time with no sales. Not to mention issues like the defective graphics cards that plagued the iMac's in 2010-2012 causing early deaths would be easily fixed by any technician by replacement.
They would rather have multiple product lines that they are too incompetent to keep up to date than just have a single product that could replace them all, do it easier, cheaper, require less often complete product updates, and even offer their customers more functionality and possibilities.
THIS is the one thing that tells me Apple is just ignorant as a computing company.
I'm not sure what you mean by "they do exist alongside each other for years" but to explain my point, the retina MacBook Pros are just MacBook Pros. They had to be named 'MacBook Pro with Retina display" because it existed alongside the non-retina model. Although that is true as of today (the non-retina is sold online), it won't be after the new models are released.
So you think they will dump the MBP and call the rMPB the MBP? By todays prices this would be an insane price increase! The 13" rMBP with a 500GB SSD is $1799! The 13" MBP with 500 GB HD is just 1099! Swap out the HD with a SSD for $100 and you save $600!
The non retina macbook pro sucks the screen is lackluster to say the very least. I notice a difference for sure in the retina screen.
Thanks for the input.Apple is aiming at two different markets; those who do notice a difference (like us) and those who don't. I totally agree that retina display look waaaay better; but not all people notice or care about that.
That's not how it works at Apple. The bean counters and industrial designers now rule Apple. With Ive in control of software interface design and hardware design I'd bet good money that he had a hand in this virtual F-key strip. His design record shows a gross neglect of function in favor of form, so I fully expect the virtual F-keys to look slick and be a function downgrade from physical f-keys.
Look at it this way: it's common to buy a physical keyboard to use in lieu of the virtual keys on a touchscreen device. Have you ever heard of anyone buying a virtual touchscreen keyboard to replace a physical keyboard?
...I quite like to choose the time of my bathroom and coffee breaks, thanks - preferably not it the middle of a complicated job, while demonstrating something or taking a phone call, or immediately having come back from a break. Also, relying on quickie "top-up" charges just means that you'll keep on getting these interruptions whereas a full charge would last for weeks.
Why are people so desperate to make excuses for Apple? They charge premium prices and blow their trumpet loudly (often with justification) about their design skills. Hold them to their own high standards!
Yes, yes: we're drawing, mousing and charging all wrong. Totally our fault and not in any way whatsoever related to piss-poor design from Apple. We get it.That's not a problem, you charge it when you walk away for a few hours (or less?) and it's good for like a month or two. BIG ****ING DEAL.
[...]
Why are people so desperate to make up nightmare scenarios that don't actually exist in real life usage of these products? Do you know how much usage you get from a Pencil on a single charge? Do you think you'd forget to plug it in once in a while when you step away from your work if you're aware it's getting on the low side? OMG WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN (trying to use the Apple Pencil)!!!!11
Magnetically attached parallel to the edge of the iPad vs. sticking straight out from the lightning socket? Perhaps I can enlighten you about a bit of cutting-edge physics called "the lever". Dislodge the pencil from the smart socket and it falls off harmlessly (unless you're really unlucky and it falls several feet and hits a hard floor point first). Snag the pencil against something while its sticking straight out and it places a huge amount of force on the lightning socket end.
...i.e. you can't charge the pencil at the same time as the iPad, so you have to carry a second charger, or put up with continually topping up the pencil.
Very frequently if you're going to rely on 2-minute top-ups... and, of course, Finagle's law says that it will run out when you're in the middle of a rush job. With my Logitech MX Master mouse, the charge warning comes up, I plug it in, go on working with the wire connected and an hour later I can forget about charging again it for about a month. Isn't that just better? Not to mention the array nice, positive buttons and wheels falling neatly under fingers vs. finger-twisting gestures, or the ability to pair with 3 different computers...
Your understanding of Jobs, Cook, and Apple is off. Jobs has been really passionate about a few products, the original Mac, the iMac, the iPhone, and unrealized Apple TV. The iPad was relative afterthought, which is why it was essentially just an enlarged phone when it first launched.
Why are people so desperate to make up nightmare scenarios that don't actually exist in real life usage of these products? Do you know how much usage you get from a Pencil on a single charge? Do you think you'd forget to plug it in once in a while when you step away from your work if you're aware it's getting on the low side? OMG WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN (trying to use the Apple Pencil)!!!!11
I am a big fan of having the right tool on hand. I used to have a laptop I'd plug in to use as a faux desktop, but found it just cumbersome in general.
It's great to have the iMac as a big, stable main machine which doubles as a media server around the house, while having a relatively stripped-down MacBook Air 11" for writing and light stuff elsewhere.
Between Dropbox (for most files) and iCloud (for calendars, notes, Photos, some other stuff), I don't come across much that I'm missing between my iMac 5K and my MBA 11". As long as I put the Air on the internet once in a while, it updates its mail, iMessages, Dropbox files... pretty much everything is automatic at this point. Dropbox's selective sync means I can keep a subset of my files on the Air and not overload its smallish SSD with all the stuff that's on the iMac. If there's no wifi and I find I'm missing something that hasn't synced, worst case scenario is I tether to my iPhone for a few minutes and let it all sync up.
I've been using Macs for about 20 years and I will say that the state of syncing is vastly better than it's ever been before. Honestly I don't even think about it very often![]()
Yes, yes: we're drawing, mousing and charging all wrong. Totally our fault and not in any way whatsoever related to piss-poor design from Apple. We get it.![]()
I'd love to see a source on that, never heard that before.But the iPad's development predates the iPhone's...
I'd love to see a source on that, never heard that before.
I agree with your setup. I have a 27" iMac and a MBA. I use Synology NAS with their CloudStation to synchronize files both locally and remotely, and also perform Time Machine backups. It works really well, and because our city just installed municipal gigabit fiber. I can do it extremely fast no matter where I am. 4TB of online storage with no monthly fee for iCloud/Dropbox etc.All good points. I have enjoyed having the 12-inch MacBook for everywhere my 27-inch (non-5K) iMac can't be. I like being able to sit at my desk and just hop on the iMac with no need to fuss with cables (although USB-C/TB3 would make that less of an issue). For the most part, I am using these Macs at home so I use Back to My Mac/local File Sharing to gain access to all files on my iMac if I need them. Back to My Mac even wakes the iMac for file access when it's sleeping so that's great. Unfortunately, Back to My Mac remotely can be very finicky, to the point where it's hard to rely on it working every time.
I keep most of my documents in iCloud Drive, so can't justify also paying DropBox even though the selective sync feature is more robust than iCloud. I also don't like the idea of all my files being exposed in the cloud with a simple password. I like using FileVault and local encryption free from Apple's control or anyone else.
This setup is the most expensive since it includes the purchase of two Macs, but it's probably the best of both words - very powerful desktop and ultraportable notebook. I suppose the only downside is you can't have a multi-display desktop setup like you can with a MacBook Pro and external display. Haven't ruled anything out, and am excited to see what will hopefully be available later this fall.
Interesting read, thanks for link. So the idea of the iPad came first, but the development of the phone came first.