Apple to Require COVID Testing for Employees Starting Next Month, Still No Vaccine Mandate

[nathansz]

Do you not understand the meaning of the word “rate”?

Which part or parts of the “clickbait” WebMD article do you believe were inaccurate?

again, i never said anything in that article itself was necessarily inaccurate

i’m curious though as to why you are so obsessed with this article and what exactly you think it is saying that has anything to do with the general thrust of your arguments

 

[jk73]

again, i never said anything in that article itself was necessarily inaccurate

i’m curious though as to why you are so obsessed with this article and what exactly you think it is saying that has anything to do with the general thrust of your arguments

Because you spent two hours claiming it was “clickbait” but broke forum rules by refusing to provide citations to support your position. That’s why.

If you didn’t have anything constructive to add, you should have done us all a favor and not posted.

 

[nathansz]

Because you spent two hours claiming it was “clickbait” but broke forum rules by refusing to provide citations to support your position. That’s why.

If you didn’t have anything constructive to add, you should have done us all a favor and not posted.

so what was the point of you posting the article?

 

[jk73]

so what was the point of you posting the article?

Because I was asked for one on the topic of ventilator usage. Do you even read comments before replying? Sure doesn’t seem like it.

 

[nathansz]

Because I was asked for one on the topic of ventilator usage. Do you even read comments before replying? Sure doesn’t seem like it.

you were asked for one what?

what do you think the article is saying in your defence?

if you have any sort of cohesive or coherent argument you shouldn’t be afraid to share it

 

[jk73]

you were asked for one what?

what do you think the article is saying in your defence?

Re-read the thread. I’m not wasting any more time on this. Enough is enough.

 

[nathansz]

Re-read the thread. I’m not wasting any more time on this. Enough is enough.

i’m pretty sure i think i know what your saying but thought i’d give you the opportunity to explain it yourself first

so basically the article is meant to prove that the “experts” don’t know anything since a hospital started trying to hold off on how soon people are out in breathing lnhalators

thereby anything else the “experts” say must be wrong.

that about it?

pretty weak i’d say, that’s why i wanted to give you a chance first

 

[jk73]

i’m pretty sure i think i know what your saying but thought i’d give you the opportunity to explain it yourself first

so basically the article is meant to prove that the “experts” don’t know anything since a hospital started trying to hold off on how soon people are out in breathing lnhalators

thereby anything else the “experts” say must be wrong.

that about it?

pretty weak i’d say, that’s why i wanted to give you a chance first

No, that’s not “about it.” Now do #605 and #607.

 

[nathansz]

No, that’s not “about it.” Now do #605 and #607

what are you saying then?

605 is just some spurious claims without any evidence for the claims not conclusion about what they would mean even if true

again, if you have a coherent argument to make then make it. otherwise it’s just more nonsense and innuendo

 

[I7guy]

The same ”experts” who told us to worry more about the flu than Covid? The same ”experts” who killed countless patients with ventilators?

Sure thing.

Some of you people are way too impressed with dummies with dopey credentials.

I’d rather believe someone who made a mistake and learned from it, than someone who never learned at all. But that’s me.

 

[nathansz]

The same ”experts” who told us to worry more about the flu than Covid? The same ”experts” who killed countless patients with ventilators?

Sure thing.

Some of you people are way too impressed with dummies with dopey credentials.

when were “experts” killing countless patients with ventilators

is that what your webmd article was supposed to be about?

the article itself says:

“These critically ill patients die because they are so sick from COVID-19 that they needed a ventilator to remain alive, not because the ventilator fatally harms them”

 

[A MacBook lover]

All this talk about “freedoms”. They‘re still free to choose. But choices have consequences. These people are freely choosing to not comply with their employer’s requirement and losing their jobs.

Lack of freedom would be forcibly being hogtied and stuck with a needle. That’s not what’s happening.

And when the truckers follow ATC, Pilots, along with other industries, you will definitely feel the consequences of *forced* unconstitutional mandates.

Apple was smart not to mandate.

 

[nathansz]

And when the truckers follow ATC, Pilots, along with other industries, you will definitely feel the consequences of *forced* unconstitutional mandates.

Apple was smart not to mandate.

pilots make good money. i doubt many of them are going to give up their jobs because of some nonsense they read on the internet.

certainly some will, but not enough for anyone to “definitely feel the consequences”

 

[jk73]

pilots make good money. i doubt many of them are going to give up there jobs because of some nonsense they read on the internet.

certainly some will, but not enough for anyone to “definitely feel the consequences”

Thousands of people sleeping on the floor in airports this weekend might say otherwise.

 

[jk73]

what are you saying then?

605 is just some spurious claims without any evidence for the claims not conclusion about what they would mean even if true

again, if you have a coherent argument to make then make it. otherwise it’s just more nonsense and innuendo

Which of my claims were “spurious”? Post citations.

 

[A MacBook lover]

pilots make good money. i doubt many of them are going to give up there jobs because of some nonsense they read on the internet.

certainly some will, but not enough for anyone to “definitely feel the consequences”

Scientific studies backing hesitancy to all brands of Covid Vaccine

You keep ignoring evidence of heart inflammation, blood clots, autoimmune disorders, other viable treatments. Scientific studies are too much for you? Is the vaccine a cure-all?

 

[nathansz]

Which of my claims were “spurious”? Post citations.

you made the claims. prove that they aren’t

 

[nathansz]

Scientific studies backing hesitancy to all brands of Covid Vaccine

You keep ignoring evidence of heart inflammation, blood clots, autoimmune disorders, other viable treatments. Scientific studies are too much for you? Is the vaccine a cure-all?
Pilots don’t even eat the same meal for safety reasons, yet mandating a flawed vaccine is somehow logical?

yeah we’ve been over all of those multiple times remember

 

[A MacBook lover]

yeah we’ve been over all of those multiple times remember

Pilots don’t even eat the same meal for safety reasons, yet mandating a flawed vaccine to everyone without choice is somehow logical?

 

[A MacBook lover]

yeah we’ve been over all of those multiple times remember

Oh yeah, you said - none of that stuff exists. People should be forced to have this vaccine. Not physically forced, haha. Like lose your job and a way to provide for your family. See, it’s your choice!

I’m glad apple saw through this and offered their employees CHOICE

 

[jk73]

you made the claims. prove that they aren’t

No, that’s not how it works.

 

[nathansz]

No, that’s not how it works.

so we can make whatever claims we want and it’s up to someone else to prove us wrong? is that how this works now?

like how “the experts” kept telling us that we just had to drink penguin urine to fight off infection but then they changed their minds and used their authoritarian powers to wipe any mention from the record?

 

[I7guy]

Scientific studies backing hesitancy to all brands of Covid Vaccine

You keep ignoring evidence of heart inflammation, blood clots, autoimmune disorders, other viable treatments. Scientific studies are too much for you? Is the vaccine a cure-all?

Who is saying every medication is completely devoid of any side effects. In the last 100 years how many serious vaccination side effects occurred after 60 days? It’s okay if you say none.

 

[jk73]

so we can make whatever claims we want and it’s up to someone else to prove us wrong? is that how this works now?

like how “the experts” kept telling us that we just had to drink penguin urine to fight off infection but then they changed their minds and used their authoritarian powers to wipe any mention from the record?

That’s hilarious. I guess I’ve missed the extensive catalogue of citations you’ve posted.

 

[jk73]

Who is saying every medication is completely devoid of any side effects. In the last 100 years how many serious vaccination side effects occurred after 60 days? It’s okay if you say none.

This nonsense again? You think a bunch of European countries just stopped giving the mRNA vaccines to ANYONE UNDER AGE 30 because of a few reports of short-term side effects?