Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Smart TVs already have most of these capabilities right? 🤔
if tv comes with Netflix, YouTube, Apple TV, amazon, Disney,......etc. etc.
then you are right. you don't need Apple TV.
unless the tv you buy is something like android tv or some other odd OS, Apple TV should be considered for my part.
 
My problem with the Apple TV hardware is that there is no audio output jacks. Like how the F are you supposed to connect it to some external speakers?

Seriously don't understand why Apple continues to disregard those users who just want to use this with a TV and set external speakers...

Insane...
you can connect it to the tv directly. all those sub woofer or whatever you call it, has a line connected to the tv anyway and it can play any audio coming from Apple TV. absolutely no problem here.

alternatively as Apple promoted last year, 2-4 HomePods are exceptionally great quality with seamless connectivity.
 
alternatively as Apple promoted last year, 2-4 HomePods are exceptionally great quality with seamless connectivity.

I tried using a pair of HomePod minis and the latency was just horrible...made watching shows impossible...even today, you need a hardwire connection because the latency is just terrible...
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: boombashi
My problem with the Apple TV hardware is that there is no audio output jacks. Like how the F are you supposed to connect it to some external speakers?

Seriously don't understand why Apple continues to disregard those users who just want to use this with a TV and set external speakers...

Insane...

I agree that it should at least have one analog AUX jack like the earlier generations did. The one often overlooked benefit of an analog jack is easy compatibility with Zone 2 inputs of most modern receivers. They pretty much NEED analog in to work. Prime use is using AppleTV as a music source to "throw" music to zone 2 or zone 3 speakers elsewhere around a wired home. For example, my Zone 2 is wired to speakers outside on a deck (where self powered speakers would be at higher risk of damage by rain/humidity and don't have easy access to electrical sockets).

As is though, HDMI carries the audio:
  • HDMI out into a Receiver/Amplifier. Connect any speakers to Receiver/Amplifier. OR
  • HDMI out into HDMI audio extractor (to create analog audio jacks). Connect powered speakers to the appropriate jack. This option should cost below about $50 MAX if you have the powered speakers. OR
  • HDMI out into HDMI in on some Soundbars. Soundbar HDMI out to HDMI IN on TV. Soundbar then extracts the audio to play and forwards the video to the TV screen. OR
  • HDMI out into HDMI in on most TVs. HDMI ARC on TV OUT to HDMI in on Soundbar. TV extracts video for screen and passes through the audio to the soundbar. OR
  • HDMI out into HDMI in on most TVs. Optical out of TV to optical in on Soundbar. TV extracts video for screen and passes through audio to the soundbar. This usually results in Stereo only audio but a few TVs will pass through surround sound too. I consider this the least desirable option in this list myself, as all of the other options will likely yield better sound and/or fuller sound mostly due to pass through of the fuller signal vs/ chopping it down to stereo only as this option often does.
Personally, I go with the Receiver option myself. The flexibility that comes with a Receiver makes it the central "hub" of a great home theater even if starting one from scratch with only a speaker or two at first.
 
Last edited:
if tv comes with Netflix, YouTube, Apple TV, amazon, Disney,......etc. etc.
then you are right. you don't need Apple TV.
unless the tv you buy is something like android tv or some other odd OS, Apple TV should be considered for my part.
SVoD Apps that we log in via Apple ID aren’t usually supported on a TV. For example we use a web browser with a choice of login with Apple on a Mac. Yes there are still some you don’t want to do that.
 
Smart TVs already have most of these capabilities right? 🤔
Yes, but every "Smart TV" I've ever had I found the interface slow and cumbersome, with apps and streaming video taking a lot of time to load. To me the ATV was worth the cost to avoid all the lag, but everyone has different priorities.

I don't see a lot of reason to upgrade though as I'm still using a 1st gen ATV 4K and it's plenty fast for streaming video.
 
This is one product where I do not get the need to upgrade. If you have apple tv 4K, then what each new version will add?
Or in this case, what will the new version remove? The gigabit ethernet port, it turns out. Unless, of course, you splurge on the most expensive 128GB version.
 
  • Like
Reactions: carbocation
Ah didn't know that i could have just bought the USB-C Apple Remote instead of replacing my 1st gen 4k 😅

Oh well. At least it should provide a big speed bump and some other minor improvements.

And paying $59 just for a remote somehow feels worse 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: LCC0256
I got the 2017 4K model and am still not tempted. The new remote is the only one I'm thinking about replacing but not going to pay the price I am asked for. I will wait until something bigger happens with Apple TV and replace it.
Honestly, I'm getting tired of all small hardware updates bringing nothing new.
 

Apple TV 4K (Second-Generation, 2021)

  • A12 Bionic chip (2.49 GHz, 6-core)
  • Support for high-framerate HDR content up to 60 fps
  • ARC and eARC support
  • HDMI 2.1 port
  • Wi-Fi 6
  • Bluetooth 5.0
  • Thread support
  • Second-generation Siri Remote (Lightning charging port) included, featuring complete redesign with circular clickpad
The HDMI 2.1 port information is wrong. No AppleTV has what most people would describe as and HDMI 2.1 port. Instead, the Apple TV 4k (2021, 2022) has one HDMI 2.1 feature (which is eARC). The port itself is still an 18 Gbps port which supports a max 4k@60 Hz. The rules around marketing HDMI state that version numbers can only be used in marketing regarding features, not the port/bandwidth - this is why the specifications have a footnote that clarifies that eARC is the HDMI 2.1 feature.
 
  • Support for audio output with 7.1.4 surround sound channels with Dolby Atmos
Atmos over DD+ was never limited to 7.1.4, that’s a sound mixers job. Some Disney mixes were fixed at 7.1.4, however most Atmos mixes are limited to your AVR / system ability.
I’m 9.2.6 over my 2017 apple 4k tv
 
This article overlooked the genuine 1st generation Apple TV (2007). I still have two of these....
7625258f-692c-40e2-8ae7-20088773780c.jpeg
 
My problem with the Apple TV hardware is that there is no audio output jacks. Like how the F are you supposed to connect it to some external speakers?

Seriously don't understand why Apple continues to disregard those users who just want to use this with a TV and set external speakers...

Insane...
Apple TV hardware has HDMI output. HDMI stands for "high definition media interface", and handles both the video and audio of media. For the video, you need an external monitor, or TV. For the audio, you need external amplifiers for each of the audio channels. Typically these are contained in an AV amplifier, which you connect to the Apple TV and your (actual) TV via HDMI, and your eternal speakers via speaker cables. Good Luck ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: red elma
They do, until the apps age out. I wish I could buy a great dumb OLED panel to use with my ATV.
This. I have a Samsung "smart" TV but I use it exclusively with my Apple TV. I did try the built-in apps just to see how they compared - not even close. Slow, frustrating UX, full of ads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mattewes
My problem with the Apple TV hardware is that there is no audio output jacks. Like how the F are you supposed to connect it to some external speakers?

I wished Apple kept the optical output, or better yet, put in an AUX with the Toslink, like the AirPort Express and some Macs.

But there are solutions with just HDMI. You can have it connected to an A/V Receiver or use the HDMI adapters that adds and audio output.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: HobeSoundDarryl
Any reason that anyone can think of for someone with an LG C1 (state of the art OLED television) to go from the A12 to A15 Apple TV? LG makes it impossible to suss out the fine specs on these things and to know what does and doesn't bring out the best on it.

I'm gathering no but figure someone is more TV expert than I. I don't think the C1 supports HDR10+ and that is what I could see being the reason to upgrade if it did. That and the C1 and Apple TV seems to play perfectly well on Dolby Vision.

About the only thing I can think of is the A12 and A15 I believe are limited to 60 fps. The C1 natively does 120 fps. I am not sure what streaming platform, if any, is doing 120 fps. So, unless the A15 version in the future gets bumped up to 120, I think you will be fine.

The A15 (128GB) version also has Thread networking support. So if home automation is a big thing for you, that may be a deciding point.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.