Finally some sense on this thread.
Every time there is an update, everyone gets mad that they can't get channels for free or directly...right now most traditional channels have no reason to switch to this way. Some estimate of ESPN would be 30 a month for people or higher - and yes a lot of cord cutters don't care if they aren't sports fans, but for those of us who like sports that is a bit ridiculous.
Not to mention that all the money for "unwanted channels" provides money to make shows on some obscure network you might enjoy....
The direct pricing game might not be as "cheap" as people think.
Sports are really expensive. If you are a sports fan you can only hope and pray that the subsidy from all the other cable subscribers continues on forever. For the rest of us, though (and for those who only have a few sports they follow), direct pricing is a reality now, and it is really cheap compared to cable.
As one anecdote, my family cut the cord just about five years ago (Sept-Oct, 2008), took the $85/month we were paying DirecTV and put a budget of $50/month towards a la carte AppleTV/etc offerings. We rarely hit $25 in TV entertainment in a month. Meanwhile the DirecTV package we'd grandfathered into today costs new subscribers well over $100 a month.
Are there channels and shows that we don't watch now? Of course. But no one has complained. We're less likely to have the TV on as "background noise" than we were five years ago, but I don't see that as a loss. We don't see shows the day they air for the most part, but we also don't structure our lives around a TV schedule (we could watch just about everything the next day, but usually go for a few weeks then watch multiple episodes of a show in a night or a few nights in a row, then the next nights watch multiple episodes of a different show, etc). Our oldest kids are teenagers, and the sporadic-binge approach is how their friends watch TV today anyway.
So, frankly, the "there's nothing better than the schlock the cable company is serving up" argument rings hollow. You can be entertained and have more control and a better interface and better quality all at once, and still save perhaps 75% off your current cable bill.
That is, unless you are a sports junkie who needs to have men/women playing games on your TV all day long. But, frankly, soon you folks are going to be the only people left in the cable TV ghetto, and your sports won't continue to be subsidized on the backs of the rest of us.
----------
But if you want to check the weather while you're already using your ATV, then it's right there.
But I'm never "using my AppleTV". I'm watching a show. Or looking for something to watch. Or ordering something.
99.95% of the time, tapping weather on my phone is more convenient than stopping what I am doing, menuing out, finding a weather app, and clicking in, then menuing back out and back down to what I was doing before. Hell, if I wanted that kind of disruption I'd remove my seat from the couch, walk over to the door, and stick my head outside to see how hot/cold it is today.
It's like the "news" and "weather" stations on the Wii way back when that was new. Kinda okay for a demo, but no practical use, ever.