Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Or, at the very least, let iTunes run something in the background so that it can continue streaming even if the iTune application itself is closed.

Agree on this.

I also think they need to retool itunes. It's seems like a resource hog.

I wonder if they will put itunes in the cloud somewhat so that it's not actually running on your computer - but it access your hard drive for content...
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8L1)

That's because the next Apple TV .... will be a TV. ;)
 
I don't think you need an app store to provide Pandora streaming. Just how there's no app store, but you have Netflix streaming. Just build it directly into the software. Similar to how they're building Twitter into iOS 5, or how Pandora is built into my Blu-Ray player's software (as is Blockbuster and Netflix). Don't need an app store to do that.

If you like Netflix, great!
If you like Hulu, sorry.

If you like baseball, great!
If you like basketball, sorry.

If you like internet radio, great!
If you like Pandora, sorry.


Wouldn't it be better if these companies could submit apps instead of waiting by the phone, hoping Apple will call them someday? And let's say Apple DOES add Pandora soon...well... If you like Spotify, sorry!
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8L1)

That's because the next Apple TV .... will be a TV. ;)

I don't think so. And I think it's more likely that other TV manufacturers will integrate Apple TV into its hardware before Apple, themselves got into the TV market.
 
Let's do a little exercise.

Why does the Apple TV need an App store?

How would you control those apps? With the existing remote? No, too limited. Probably you'll suggest that Apple include a touch screen remote, but then the price would skyrocket from $99 to at least double that (more like triple).

So ok, people should just use their iPods and iPhones and iPads to control the Apps on your TV. Exactly, but then why does the app need to run on the AppleTV when there's more processing power on the handheld device and an already established App Store?

I've been suggesting this for quite some time and Apple has been consistently following steps on a path to realizing this vision: Apps run on your touch screen devices and stream appropriate content to the TV.

The new AirPlay Mirroring brings this vision nearly to fruition. Apple just needs to release more developer tools to make this easier to implement. Give developers the ability to specify a separate UI for a second screen.

For example, a news app would display the news story on the handheld screen (i.e. iPhone or iPad) where its more comfortable to read while pictures and video of the story show on your big screen where that content can best be enjoyed. The Mail app would let you read the email in your hands while attachments show on the TV. Video games would give each player a private screen and the TV would serve as an overview of the full game. The YouTube app would play videos on the AppleTV while you could control the video on the touch screen and read and post comments. There's already a Pandora App for iOS and it works great with the AppleTV.

We don't need a 3rd App Store and yet another copy of an app. The "AppleTV App store" already exists and we'll see more of it with the release of iOS5 and AirPlay mirroring.
 
At this point do they just not want it to cannibalize sales of the Mac Mini?
 
I picked up an Apple TV after the Sony password debacle, because I needed something to play Netflix and MLB.TV. I'll never go back to the PS3 now. The quality difference in MLB.TV is night and day. I was to the point where I was considering dropping my subscription. But the Apple TV does a terrific job.
 
There will be an update to the Apple TV this fall...A5 chip and a bit more storage and 1080p streaming.

But same $99 price...we will see it when the Iphone 5, Itouch 5 is announced this fall....ie september...
 
I picked up an Apple TV after the Sony password debacle, because I needed something to play Netflix and MLB.TV. I'll never go back to the PS3 now. The quality difference in MLB.TV is night and day. I was to the point where I was considering dropping my subscription. But the Apple TV does a terrific job.


PS3 is still better picture quality in netflix...but I use Apple TV 2 because it is instant on. and easier to use.
 
Let's do a little exercise.

Why does the Apple TV need an App store?

How would you control those apps? With the existing remote? No, too limited. Probably you'll suggest that Apple include a touch screen remote, but then the price would skyrocket from $99 to at least double that (more like triple).

Apple has been adding Apps to the Apple TV its whole life. They put Netflix in it and then they put Major League Baseball in it.

Nobody had trouble using them. Apple wasn't forced to include a touch-screen remote.

This isn't impossible, clearly. We're just asking them to speed up the processes instead of adding one app per year.
 
If you like Netflix, great!
If you like Hulu, sorry.

If you like baseball, great!
If you like basketball, sorry.

If you like internet radio, great!
If you like Pandora, sorry.


Wouldn't it be better if these companies could submit apps instead of waiting by the phone, hoping Apple will call them someday? And let's say Apple DOES add Pandora soon...well... If you like Spotify, sorry!

We need a AppleTv appstore....and we will get it soon. Apple knows we want it.
 
An App Store COULD happen. Though with iPad mirroring coming down the pipeline, I don't see the need (personally) for yet another App Store. I don't think I want to buy Angry Birds AGAIN. Mac, iPad, iPhone...when does it end?
What about the people who don't have an iPad? I'm not looking to the Apple TV for games anyway... What about online shopping, video chat (extra hardware needed admittedly), endless video and music streaming services... Just general customisation?
720p vs 1080p is really not a large enough difference to warrant a whole new device.
Isn't that like saying that a Retina Display is not a large enough difference to warrant a whole new iPhone? 1080p (2.1mp) has over twice as many pixels as 720p (0.9mp).
 
Can't the jailbroken AppleTV's do 1080p now? So it's not the hardware I don't think. They probably just need an OS update.

No, the software can handle 1080p somewhat but it still streams out as 720. The 720 is a hardware limit.
 
If you like Netflix, great!
If you like Hulu, sorry.

If you like baseball, great!
If you like basketball, sorry.

If you like internet radio, great!
If you like Pandora, sorry.


Wouldn't it be better if these companies could submit apps instead of waiting by the phone, hoping Apple will call them someday? And let's say Apple DOES add Pandora soon...well... If you like Spotify, sorry!
Haha. Point taken. On the whole, I suppose an App Store would solve the issue of delivering support of the entertainment apps that we've come to know and love. I could be way off base here, but I think they're slow to act on that front because it could potentially undermine their own offerings; as limited as they are. Opening up an App Store would provide US with greater value, but it also devalues what little content they have available even more.
 
I love my ATV2.

One thing that would make me love it more is if it were able to access networked hard drives. Having to always have a computer on with iTunes open is the one thing I dislike.

+1

Yep, this is huge.
I have a MacPro and I don't want to turn it on to watch soothing out of my library and my wife has a laptop, if she leaves home I am stuck.
Time to free up ATV from the Mac. Just use it to setup and them let an external drive do the job.
 
I could be way off base here, but I think they're slow to act on that front because it could potentially undermine their own offerings; as limited as they are. Opening up an App Store would provide US with greater value, but it also devalues what little content they have available even more.

You very well may be right, but I hope they get over themselves if that's the case. They didn't worry about that on the iPhone or the iPad and both of those seem to be working out pretty well for them.
 
I was tempted to get an appletv until I realised it did nothing but enable me to AirPlay my media to my TV.

I feel it has the potential to do more than just that.
 
I love my ATV2.

One thing that would make me love it more is if it were able to access networked hard drives. Having to always have a computer on with iTunes open is the one thing I dislike.
Yup. It makes no sense that an apple network device (atv2) can't see files on my apple network harddrive (connected to airport extreme). It's kind of annoying to have a movie quit playing on the tv as a result of my laptop running out of batteries because it has to be on and awake for hours at a time. Definitely not an example of harmony within the apple ecosystem.
 
I was tempted to get an appletv until I realised it did nothing but enable me to AirPlay my media to my TV.

I feel it has the potential to do more than just that.

It's really lacking in features for those of us outside the US & Canada.

If it ever gets iPlayer and the other UK catch-up services I'll get one. LOVEFiLM Player would also make it more worthwhile but at the moment it's just too limited.
 
How about a software update? App Store! Pandora! Amazon streaming! etc! There's so much more this could do. Look at the Roku. Seems like Apple is intentionally crippling this device.

I think saying Apple is intentionally crippling AppleTV is a bridge too far. The fact they removed Front Row from Lion lends to the theory, in fact, that Apple is trying to support AppleTV. This "report," not withstanding, I imagine Apple will enhance AppleTV's features in due time. It's always been a "hobby" for Apple so you have to expect development to be glacial. That is not the equivalent to crippling it.
 
iCloud streaming

For me, what has been limiting :apple:tv is the difficulty and work involved in storing massive files for your TV Shows and Movies on a computer and/or external drives then requiring iTunes to be running to play them.

iCloud is bringing us a step closer to the model that I prefer: you buy a movie or tv show which gives you the rights to that content. You never have to download the file, just stream it to your AppleTV, Mac or iPhone/iPad/iPod whenever you want to watch it.
 
The only reason I bought an ATV at all was for airplay; after the ios5 preview, I immediately wanted to have one handy so I could do iPad mirroring. Turns out I use it for Netflix almost exclusively (meaning, more than my PS3, XBOX, or Boxee), and it's easily the best solution for streaming music to your home theatre. I still use the Boxee box for 100% of my DLC and ripped movies (the inability to sideload content makes the ATV useless to me for that, and the Boxee will handle ANY media format you throw at it), but the ATV is a perfect solution for the few things it does really, really well.

Throw an app store and ios5 on there and that's all I'll ever need.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.