Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is it your contention that Apple intends this to be an enterprise product, not a consumer product?
Certainly looks like it should have been marketed as an enterprise product, but Apple is pushing it as consumer.

As enterprise, expectations for app ecosystem would be very different and it would be understood that specialized applications need to be developed (often in-house) by the customers. Using @ChrisA ’s example, a company producing a CAT scan device would invest in developing the software to utilize AVP with their own products.

As a consumer product, it is little more than an entertainment media consumption device and even that is a tough sell for a lot of us who commonly enjoy such activities in a group.
 
… The Vision Pro is a prosumer device in the same way Apple's other prosumers devices are; that very deliberate design choice to have parity with such devices with its screen and compute capabilities.

Furthermore it's a spatial computing device that fundamentally enables the Vision pro to have impossible to copy benefits it has over Apple's other prosumer devices due to the form factor and capabilities the others don't share such as it's hands-free core UX experience, it's far more flexible and private screen canvases; and prosumer-level 3D movies support.

It can run iPad apps without hands at all in addition to mirroring and its native apps of its own for optimal multi-tasking.

Sounds like a really convoluted way of saying 'great for porn'
 
You could work on it all day. If you work on a MacBook. Big screen. Few different things open. Emails. Documents etc.
I could.... if it was comfortable enough. And for me the resolution is too low versus using actual high resolution monitors (not to be confused with the resolution of the VP's screens, before someone tells me they are the best of any headset). I simply can't think of anything worse than wearing a headset for hours and hours on end. I've tried and it is a horrible experience.
 
What single function does Vision do BETTER than a Mac?
…Spatial and private computing, 3D movie playback, and a far more convenient portable and on-the-go screen for a wide variety of computing use cases an iPad Pro and Macbook Pro can't be used as well for.

It’s often far more productive to transfer a 14/16” Macbook Pro's screen output to a Vision Pro as well—especially more so with 2.0’s 5K2K mode (4K ultrawide); a 5K2K on-the-go is definitely meaningful value to have for prosumers.
 
Last edited:
Yes, it has a nice demo

All VR headsets demo well, and that's about where it ends
Speak for yourself. Before the Vision Pro, prosumers didn’t even have an option.

Before the Vision Pro there wasn’t even a standalone headset option to watch premium home video on parity and better than 4K TVs—essentially all other standalone headsets don’t even have HDR (let alone Dolby Vision HDR)
 
It reads like it was written by an LLM and then translated through several languages
You can believe that if you want; the world is a diverse place where people can speak way differently than you do.

Conveniently ignoring the topic at hand to focus on such things is textbook ethnocentrism and a blantant ad hominem fallacy.
 
Look at the state of it.

vision-pro.jpg
 
I believe this should have been marketed as a replacement for screens and maybe a mouse. I can see people buying this as a replacement for a Studio Display (not portable so no battery.)
 
That's up there in "Apple Vision Pro Dual Loop Band" territory!

A whole bunch of games...
....or a wildly overpriced "strap" from TimCo
…The target audiences of Apple's prosumer devices does not focus on gaming on such devices; the specs of Apple's prosumer devices are directly combative of an ideal gaming experience. The Vision Pro is no different.

Also you cannot get a bunch of current-gen-exclusive modern AAA games released in the same year for 100 Euros; games this gen cost $70 USD minimum.
 
A marketing term isn’t an answer to the question.
Nice change of goals. You asked what the AVP can do better than a Mac. The Mac doesn't have cameras and depth sensors to do spatial computing. It can't display stereo images so that they look three dimensional. It can't give you 180 degree immersive videos, or 360 degree environment. If you take spatial videos or photos on your iPhone and look at them on you Mac, they just look flat. But look at your photos on the Apple Vision Pro, and they have a more lifelike depth. The AVP can place solid-looking objects in your physical space, so you can walk around them, and interact with them.

All of these things the AVP does BETTER than a Mac.
 
Why do think anything was ever different?

It’s natural aging

Your probably thinking about it backwards

Not long (relatively speaking) “before computers” near every human didn’t live long past 45 like they do now
I just hope there will be demand for healthier displays in the future when major portion of population goes blind before 30. I had a poor vision since school because of accidental self trauma, but only thanks to my old OLED iPhone 11 Pro in just 1.5 years my vision deteriorated TWICE because I worked with this phone (social media). And I have been in front of screens since my childhood, during university days too. And the older LCD displays weren’t as eye-damaging as the new OLED ones
 
I just hope there will be demand for healthier displays in the future when major portion of population goes blind before 30. I had a poor vision since school because of accidental self trauma, but only thanks to my old OLED iPhone 11 Pro in just 1.5 years my vision deteriorated TWICE because I worked with this phone (social media). And I have been in front of screens since my childhood, during university days too. And the older LCD displays weren’t as eye-damaging as the new OLED ones

Did your optometrist tell you that OLED caused your vision deterioration?
 
  • Like
Reactions: seek3r
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.