Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The new wide and ultra-wide remote display for Macs is incredible.

All they have to do is make it a portable Cinema Display for MacBooks, connected via Thunderbolt cable. Remove the external battery, the CPU subsystem, the silly front eye display, and sell it for like $1500.

That's all I wanted.
Something like this is useful and would sell well to Mac fans.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bLackjackj
I recently have spent a couple days with a friends Vision Pro. Set it up as my own and gave it a true shot. It is a feat of engineering and the best VR UI/UX experience. It also has the best passthrough and best VR movie watching experience available. Seeing your photos/videos on it is incredible. But once you get past that initial wow factor, you really see the problem. Once the "huh, that's neat" is over, you're left with an overpriced iPad strapped to your face. There are no apps for it, I can't use it with my Steam VR library, and when I tried the movies, I'd rather just watch them on my 65" OLED tv and home theater.
Exactly why I returned mine. They didn’t build any cool experiences or use cases into it. Why can’t I mod my house to be different, paint the walls, install virtual windows into exotic locales, add useful virtual gadgets around my environment? There needs to be some sense of persistence with it to make it something other than just virtual iPads hovering around your face. I was so disappointed by how little thought they put into interesting use cases for it.
 
Well, if they're having trouble selling them, maybe Apple should try something unprecedented: a BIG honking discount! I MIGHT be interested at about $1749.99. Hey, they're losing money with dead inventory, it's better get 50% of something rather than 100% of nothing, no? Either that or a tax write-off. And since corporate taxes are limited to 21%, and probably going down, smarter to sell than write-off.
 
I finally got to try one of these the other day. It is fascinating but definitely not worth the price they are asking for it. If I was insanely rich, I might pick one up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac Fly (film)
Basically. Posting any negative article about the AVP on this forum will get lots of clicks. So many people on here hate the AVP so they will swarm to this thread.
Be careful, you’re going to get banned with talk like that. I’d say the overwhelming majority of clicks on this site are from those who hate Apple. Would that drive the articles that are posted?
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Citing multiple people "directly involved" in making components for the headset, the report said that the scaling back of production began in the early summer. This indicated that Apple now has a sufficient number of Vision Pro units in its inventory to meet demand for the device's remaining lifespan through to 2025. Historically, it is not unusual for Apple to do this with low-demand products, such as the iPhone 12 mini.
This needs context. It should read:
with low-demand—yet highly-loved—products, such as the iPhone 12 mini.
 
I said it before it was released, it’s basically a proof of concept that they’re charging people a lot of money to try out. They’re not getting a hit product out of this right away, and likely for the next few years. They need to lay the foundation, build the ecosystem, miniaturize the technology, and get the costs down before it takes off.

I think by 2030, the product category will be successful in some shape or form.
 
  • Love
Reactions: jo-1
This is FALSE! The Era of Spatial Computing is here because this is tomorrow's technology, today, for early adopters to try-out before the REAL era begins!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Mr_Ed
I'm not even sure people would buy this at $499. It is a solution without a problem.
Why do so many here think that everything has to be a "solution without a problem?" This phrase is so hackneyed as to be meaningless!

Plenty of devices are created simply to be something that people may like or enjoy. They don't have to be solutions. I still love certain aspects of my AVP, especially viewing movies, shows, etc. If that's all it did, I'd be very happy to spend $499 on it. So many assumptions with no basis in fact or experience are made here.
 
The use cases are certainly there, it's just the technology (weight, battery life), and cost/value isn't yet.

But make a future version of these for $500 and they'll fly off the shelves. Even at $999 they'd probably do ok.
Some of us just don’t see it that way. I can afford it at $3500. I wouldn’t buy it for $500 because it does not provide $500 worth of value in use cases for me. Of course, YMMV.
 
The second was my apple Newton 2100. I loved that device and was brokenhearted when they killed it off. It was way ahead of its time and Apple was hemorrhaging money at the time.
The Newton was finally starting to become a mature product. The 2000 and 2100 were fantastic. The issue was that it was a project of the Sculley era, so it stood no chance when Jobs came back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johnstrass2
I am one of the first to slam Apple for these expensive goggle, but is it really out of production? Often when there is enough volume in the sales channel then they'll shutdown production for a period. This sounds like what's going on here.
 
Apple Vision Pro May Now Be Out of Production

There is a reason this site is not called MacFacts. People are soooo gullible…. 😂. Eat this stuff up baby. It makes you fat like a Christmas turkey.

So you think they are still producing them?
 
It is the App Store which made iPhone the best selling smartphone in the world. And a Smartphone you can always carry around. Whether you are alone or going out with friends or family. So, portability is key.
AVP is more or less a giant screen or an iPad. It doesn’t even run macOs. So, it’s not strange that people stay away from a product with a price tag of $3500+ which is not portable, can’t wear for more than an hour or two. There are 1000+ Apps for AVP but how many really matter for common people? If it had support for Steam, Xbox and Playstation, Apple would be selling it in millions.
 
Some of us just don’t see it that way. I can afford it at $3500. I wouldn’t buy it for $500 because it does not provide $500 worth of value in use cases for me. Of course, YMMV.

This is how I feel

It’s not about the price

It’s a product that i have no interest in

I don’t see a use case for it

And even if i did, i wouldnt fulfill that use case by strapping two screens on to my eyes while shutting out the rest of the world

………

I do see the appeal of the idea of a “spatial” ui or whatever you want to call it

But I imagine it as something that’s projected in to a room rather than having an unwieldy device attached to my face
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.