interesting how few outlets appear to be noticing how Apple's headset is priced like Microsoft's Hololens 2, with similarities around the feature set (AR...).
It's unlikely that monitors are going away, even in 10 years. It is much more likely that monitor tech will evolve and we'll see the sleek holographic-type displays that have littered scifi movies for decades.Hmm... I wonder what you might be saying in 10 years' time.
Oh the usual: free pre-release products, access to exec's to ask softball pre-screened questions of among other bribes, er perksHow much were they paid to say these things?
It does solve the problem of portable computing that requires large/multiple displays. That's a problem that many remote workers and travelers have right now.iPod solved a problem - this thing really doesn't along with all the other AR/MR/VR tech out there (its been out there for years).
You're kidding right? iJustine fawning all over an Apple product? No way!iJustine, only review that matters. The technical depth she goes to is unmatched.
View attachment 2213845
Matt, my understanding is that a FaceID-like process constructs a synthetic image that others will see in FaceTime -- great idea if you're having a good-hair day when that image is built. My guess is that many of the heads-down/spooked-by-elevator-smalltalk/still-wearing-a-mask-for-anonimity-sake generation will love hiding behind goggles.Not sure how I feel about these headsets. It's just one more layer of separation between actual human contact. I do find the demonstrations of using facetime with this a bit funny. Everyone the wearer is seeing is showing their full face, but the wearer is wearing this headset, so what do the other participants see of the wearer? What's the point of facetime if we are all wearing these headsets and can't see each others faces?
Did you catch all-day use when plugged in 🤩View attachment 2213856
It's just some Apple trickery. Just an outward display. You scan your face when setting it up and internal cameras do the rest.
I’ve seen so many first takes focusing on Facebook/Meta but what about HoloLens? How different is Vision Pro to that product? Does Microsoft even talk about HoloLens any more?HoloLens has had this for years. Hasn't moved the market or developed a widely needed consumer use case to justify these types of devices. There are some good use cases in the enterprise space.
Entertainment doesn’t solve any problems and does not need to.Most of the initial impressions I’ve read say it’s the best compared to what’s out there right now but none of them said what problem they think it’s solving. Apple didn’t say it either. They just pitched it as a general purpose computing platform on your face. But who wants to wear big, clunky googles on their face all the time?
Again, I think there was a clear problem that it addressed. Limited screen real estate. Especially when traveling. Plus the privacy aspect of not having your screen visible in public.Most of the initial impressions I’ve read say it’s the best compared to what’s out there right now but none of them said what problem they think it’s solving. Apple didn’t say it either. They just pitched it as a general purpose computing platform on your face. But who wants to wear big, clunky googles on their face all the time?
Reminds me of the Sifi movies where they illuminate the insides of space helmets so you can see their faces, which of course would blind someone to the outside, but hey it's Showbiz!
Everything has a compromise. As amazing as Tony's setup was — it was also not immersive, nor mobile — so you were tied to a square light table. Tony's experience was designed for the 3rd person viewer, not the user.
that feature will not make it to gen 2 or even the consumer model. Too creepy....but it does try to solve a problem it's just a very expertise way. A simple green or red light would do it.Gee I wonder how much additional cost was the 'eyes in front' feature?
Reminds me of the Sifi movies where they illuminate the insides of space helmets so you can see their faces, which of course would blind someone to the outside, but hey it's Showbiz!
Apache and F35 helmet/targeting tech have entered the chat. 😁In my humble opinion the groundbreaking feature is the ability to control it with your eyes. That is beyond amazing and an absolute game-changer for people with disabilities.
Sure but again, who is going to wear bulky goggles that make you look like a dork to watch movies or a sporting event?Entertainment doesn’t solve any problems and does not need to.
Really excited for comments surrounding this headset to age like the original iPod thread. Be sure to quote people with the worst takes so when they edit them they're preserved for future giggling.
Interesting... My MacBook Pro has that same feature 🤔
I bet your Magic Mouse 2 does NOT have this feature.Interesting... My MacBook Pro has that same feature
Twitter suggested me this underneath: