Yes, but it will misinterpret your hand gestures.listen can I watch porn on it yes or no
Yes, but it will misinterpret your hand gestures.listen can I watch porn on it yes or no
they spent billions on Beats as well - you might want to confirm that "no charity" statement with Dr. Dre ...Lol. Sure. They spent billions of dollars to "learn". Like I said, they aren't a charity. Get real.
not sure about packing a computer in - maybe Gen 5It's honestly not that far from this concept. Say by Gen 3 you can get to this form factor.
He’d pull it out of an envelope.At which point Jobs puts on a fashionable jacket, and pulls out a pair of "Ray-Ban Aviator"-style sunglasses (except they're hooded) out of the jacket pocket - …
…puts them on his face…
…and then Steve Jobs strikes a fashion pose, like only a true celebrity can.
--> THAT'S how Steve Jobs would introduce something like this! <--
You know, this keeps coming up every few years that Apple designs something cool... but there are lots of regulatory loopholes to go through for any product that comes close to the medical sphere that isn't (like the Apple Watch).By far, the only part of the big reveal worth watching was the demo of the beating heart. This would be a huge help for medical students and a taste of what AR could bring to the masses if AR Glasses ever came out.
Lol. Really??? That’s the best you can do???they spent billions on Beats as well - you might want to confirm that "no charity" statement with Dr. Dre ...
Sounds like for an average of 45 minDid anyone of these wear the object?
That design decision indicates that the headset is already heavy enough as-is.What I don't get is why they didn't place the battery on the nape-band so that it would act as a counterweight. I guess nobody at Apple has used night vision goggles because what causes fatigue is not weight per se but that weight not being balanced on the head which puts strain on the neck muscles.
Apple should add an option to display Cylon eyes:
Cool!!!!Apple should add an option to display Cylon eyes:
Do you have any idea of the complexity of this device and the research that went into it's development? You're making your bolded statements over and over and over again. Other high end VR devices are in the same price range, or more. I think the price is very fair and will be happy to buy one on day one.$3,499. Too Expensive. Also offers extremely limited mobility.
'By Far the Worst Priced Headset'
There’ll be a 5.4" Vision mini that for some reason won’t sell well.I'm not a Pro user so in 5 years I'll get the Vision Nano
That feature would sell more units than all of the selling points they pushed in the launch video. Have you seen the limited series Years and Years? One of the kids uses a product that does something like that.Cool!!!!
And have it so you can show any eyes. Friendly eyes when you 'like'. Snake eyes when you don't like. Hypno eyes when you want. Like that.
Jobs is dead. Give it a rest already. I really don't give a crap about what he wouldn't or would do. Frankly, I think he would have approved of this.Wonder what would Steve Jobs think about Apple Vision Pro.
There’ll be new Eyemojis with each visionOS release.Cool!!!!
And have it so you can show any eyes. Friendly eyes when you 'like'. Snake eyes when you don't like. Hypno eyes when you want. Like that.
I mean, you could watch the review on the article you're commenting on.Not sure how I feel about these headsets. It's just one more layer of separation between actual human contact. I do find the demonstrations of using facetime with this a bit funny. Everyone the wearer is seeing is showing their full face, but the wearer is wearing this headset, so what do the other participants see of the wearer? What's the point of facetime if we are all wearing these headsets and can't see each others faces?
If you follow Jobs' philosophy, he would have killed the project. It doesn't solve a problem which was his number 1 focus.
Steve jobs wouldn’t have touched this thing with a long stick, let alone approve it or present it.
He should have said to the developers “this must work with glasses too, go and make it better”Challenge for all the YouTubers out there:
Grab a picture with Tim Cook while wearing Apple Vision Pro. Tim Cook must be wearing it as well.
View attachment 2213886
So you’d rather pay $3000 for surgery than $300 (guessing) for a pair of prescription inserts? They will never design this for usage with glasses. They have no incentive to, plus that’s almost impossible without making it too bulky, especially with the return of large frames into common fashion.Eye surgeries will boom or they need to redesign it for usage with glasses. Don’t see the acceptance to order additional glasses only for a headset.
It's honestly not that far from this concept. Say by Gen 3 you can get to this form factor.
Well the suit was pretty mobileEverything has a compromise. As amazing as Tony's setup was — it was also not immersive, nor mobile — so you were tied to a square light table. Tony's experience was designed for the 3rd person viewer, not the user.
They didnt ever show that...on purpose I think. But...yet I think that is the next step if it becomes popular. Right now no two people with these will ever be in the same room...Now I wonder about the combination of "virtual personal FaceTime" and the person-sensing/eye-display-to-outside-people.
If you're in person using this around another person also using it, will it replace their head with the virtual persona version so you don't even see that they're wearing one, too?
But it's still looking for a problem to solve...cool tech, niche product.