Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Lol. Sure. They spent billions of dollars to "learn". Like I said, they aren't a charity. Get real.
they spent billions on Beats as well - you might want to confirm that "no charity" statement with Dr. Dre ...
 
At which point Jobs puts on a fashionable jacket, and pulls out a pair of "Ray-Ban Aviator"-style sunglasses (except they're hooded) out of the jacket pocket - …
…puts them on his face…
…and then Steve Jobs strikes a fashion pose, like only a true celebrity can.

--> THAT'S how Steve Jobs would introduce something like this! <--
He’d pull it out of an envelope.
 
By far, the only part of the big reveal worth watching was the demo of the beating heart. This would be a huge help for medical students and a taste of what AR could bring to the masses if AR Glasses ever came out.
You know, this keeps coming up every few years that Apple designs something cool... but there are lots of regulatory loopholes to go through for any product that comes close to the medical sphere that isn't (like the Apple Watch).

The real big bet is going to be on No Click purchasing... you see someone on the street, "I want that jacket" and it buys that jacket. The global retail market is worth $26 trillion. Apple set in motion its last 20 years by quietly licensing one-click purchasing from Amazon and acquiring Casady & Greene. Their next twenty will be defined by how they position themselves as the leader in no click e commerce.

Forget gaming... imagine standing in front of a mirror, seeing yourself wearing a product you just saw someone else wearing on the street, and so that sizing and product information gets transmitted to the retailer, ordered, shipped to your door. Forget going onto the metaverse... Rich people would pay through the nose (or visor, as it were) to have a Chanel boutique that materializes in their own house whenever they want.
 
What I don't get is why they didn't place the battery on the nape-band so that it would act as a counterweight. I guess nobody at Apple has used night vision goggles because what causes fatigue is not weight per se but that weight not being balanced on the head which puts strain on the neck muscles.
That design decision indicates that the headset is already heavy enough as-is.
 

$3,499. Too Expensive. Also offers extremely limited mobility.

'By Far the Worst Priced Headset'

Do you have any idea of the complexity of this device and the research that went into it's development? You're making your bolded statements over and over and over again. Other high end VR devices are in the same price range, or more. I think the price is very fair and will be happy to buy one on day one.
 
Cool!!!!

And have it so you can show any eyes. Friendly eyes when you 'like'. Snake eyes when you don't like. Hypno eyes when you want. Like that.
That feature would sell more units than all of the selling points they pushed in the launch video. Have you seen the limited series Years and Years? One of the kids uses a product that does something like that.
 
Not sure how I feel about these headsets. It's just one more layer of separation between actual human contact. I do find the demonstrations of using facetime with this a bit funny. Everyone the wearer is seeing is showing their full face, but the wearer is wearing this headset, so what do the other participants see of the wearer? What's the point of facetime if we are all wearing these headsets and can't see each others faces?
I mean, you could watch the review on the article you're commenting on.
 
If you follow Jobs' philosophy, he would have killed the project. It doesn't solve a problem which was his number 1 focus.

Steve jobs wouldn’t have touched this thing with a long stick, let alone approve it or present it.

To be honest yesterday I thought that this is one of they very few products of the past ten years he might have been really proud of, but you both might have a point. Time will tell, but I guess this might be a case where he would have been proved wrong - just like he was when iPhones bigger than 4" seemed to be out of question.
 
Eye surgeries will boom or they need to redesign it for usage with glasses. Don’t see the acceptance to order additional glasses only for a headset.
So you’d rather pay $3000 for surgery than $300 (guessing) for a pair of prescription inserts? They will never design this for usage with glasses. They have no incentive to, plus that’s almost impossible without making it too bulky, especially with the return of large frames into common fashion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn
Everything has a compromise. As amazing as Tony's setup was — it was also not immersive, nor mobile — so you were tied to a square light table. Tony's experience was designed for the 3rd person viewer, not the user.
Well the suit was pretty mobile :)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Websnapx2
Hideous product, accelerating the disconnect from a social world into a digitally connected one. The last we all need.

On the other hand, epic execution.

It's not for me due to the aforementioned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
Now I wonder about the combination of "virtual personal FaceTime" and the person-sensing/eye-display-to-outside-people.

If you're in person using this around another person also using it, will it replace their head with the virtual persona version so you don't even see that they're wearing one, too?
They didnt ever show that...on purpose I think. But...yet I think that is the next step if it becomes popular. Right now no two people with these will ever be in the same room...
 
But it's still looking for a problem to solve...cool tech, niche product.

I use my iPhone a lot while lying down in bed or on the couch, and can't stand the weird angles required for my arm to hold it up or the tension in my fingers to keep it in my palm (my pinky hates me for using it as a platform), along with having to lift my other arm to use the screen half the time or type.

Problem solved.


Sometimes I want to lie down and do serious work, but the MacBook Air is clunky and limits body positions, and the iPad mini has the same problems as the iPhone, just bigger.

Problem solved.


I've never cared about 3D stuff, particularly TV's. I'll actually watch 3D movies in this, since I'll already have this device for other purposes.

Problem solved.


All the other headsets out there looked/performed so comical or half-baked, made for games or whathever. Apple turned theirs into a new computing platform.

Problem solved.


I do a lot of camping (vanlife) and of course have my MacBook Air for a main screen and iPhone for portability, but a 50-100" TV can't fit inside my SUV camper.

Problem solved.


I've personally never wanted a TV in my house. Just a nice sitting area that is inviting to the occasional company, or conducive to lounging without distractions. But I'd still like to lounge in that spot and sometimes access/create content … but not use iPhone, iPad, or MacBook as I discussed above.

Problem solved. (Apple depicted this TV-free environment several times, so I'm not the only one dreaming of it.)


AVP solves many problems which I've endured for years.
Just not everyone has those problems.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.