It’ll be visionairy!Definitely a good headset. But priced very high. Hopefully in the future, a cheaper headset, maybe Vision Air will be launched
It’ll be visionairy!Definitely a good headset. But priced very high. Hopefully in the future, a cheaper headset, maybe Vision Air will be launched
Exactly. People not having a clue what they are talking about and comparing low end junk devices. It's like comparing a feature phone to the iPhone. There is a market there for high-end devices, like you've shown. It may be small but it will serve to filter the tech and features down to the mainstream in time.Not for AR, this is kind of standard. For example:
![]()
Starts at (checks notes) $3500.
Magic Leap is $3200.
Maybe apple will make a Vision (sans Pro) next year, drop the whole eyesight screen on front and remove the glass front to save weight.
-d
To an extent a lot of people said the same about the iPhone, it was a premium high-tech device that pretty much made calls, sent text messages, and had nice apps for everyday things like a web browser, notes, clocks, and contacts. There was no App Store for a year.But it's still looking for a problem to solve...cool tech, niche product.
No, he would have bullied the team into making it half the size with triple the battery life. Then he would have pulled it from his jacket pocket and worn it for a 6 hour launch event.Steve Jobs would have worn the freaky thing live, right before our eyes to show how amazingly simple and intuitive it is.
That’s a behaviour Tim Cook has never displayed on stage. Unfortunately.
Many said the same thing about tablets.But it's still looking for a problem to solve...cool tech, niche product.
It literally is how we got from iPhone to iPhone 14, but I’ve seen how not everyone has the capacity to understand.They need to make a giant clunky headset that is way to expensive to be mainstream, before just making their AR/VR glasses...? That makes no sense. They should have waited for the glasses and launched that, not this. Keep this internal or for a very small amount of external companies to make apps and test. The word of mouth and youtube videos will generate enough hype.
But it's still looking for a problem to solve...cool tech, niche product.
It would never make it to market because the Goggles are an exercise in Tech Engineering Doing Something Because they Can, not because they should.
Is Apple Polishing Cloth compatible with Apple Vision Pro? I don't really want to pay $199 for Vision Pro Polishing Cloth.Vision Pro Headset: $3,499.00
Zeiss Lenses for the Vision Impaired: $400
Spare Battery: $250
Spare Forehead Band: $199
1TB Memory Upgrade: $500
Vision Pro Polishing Cloth: $199
Tax: $505
Total: $5,552
Memories of your bank account as you gaze longingly at the new addition to your closet shelf: Priceless
It had the best display tech, it was revolutionary.To an extent a lot of people said the same about the iPhone, it was a premium high-tech device that pretty much made calls, sent text messages, and had nice apps for everyday things like a web browser, notes, clocks, and contacts. There was no App Store for a year.
Give the Vision Pro a few more iterations and it'll have its "iPhone 4 moment", and the masses will flood in. And definitely don't underestimate this products potential impact (remember what Steve Balmer said about the iPhone?).
Veruca Salt vibesI WANT ONE NOW