I'm hardly pie in the sky about AVP. As an engineer having been involved in multiple product developments over the years, I know that there are always difficult engineering trades that need to be made. With respect to Apple, that goes all the way back to the first Mac with a 7.5" B&W screen and limited memory. And especially the first iPod/iPhone/iPad/Watch/AirPods/etc., all pronounced as flops by many here.
"Many of your posts are lamenting the lack of imagination on the part of those who are bringing up the negative points of the VP. "
If it were just negative points that would be fine. And I agree that there are limitations with AVP, such as battery capacity, runtime, size/weight, etc.
I also have stated this is a first generation product, which will evolve into further generations of AVPs that are smaller, lighter weight, lower power dissipation (and thus longer run time), and lower cost. That's how products evolve in general, and as demonstrated many times by Apple. All devices will have limitations and flaws knowing that one will never have 100% perfection 100% of the time. It's how those limitations are traded off and managed that result in successful products that have a bright future, and evolving with future generations as the technology becomes more accessible at lower costs.
But many here go much further and point blank say there are no uses for AVP (and thus AR and VR), and as a result it will fail.
For me that speaks to a lack of imagination and not being interested into doing even a tiny bit of research about AR/VR in general, and how it's been used in the past and present in many different disciplines. That refusal to do even a little bit of research speaks to a lack of curiosity.