It is, but in past years they sold cables and BRICKS that many people did not use. And they needed more space on planes and boats to ship the same number of phones. So, the act of removing the charger and making the box smaller, at the scale at which they operate, might have an actual positive impact.But can they really stand on the roof talking about saving the environment by producing and shipping a cable that many people won’t use? Seems a tad wasteful, no?
Now let me rephrase it:
Removing the charger and making the box smaller, at the scale at which they operate, might have lead to a marginal but measureble reduction in the MASSIVE environmental impact of their business.
Of course them stand on the roof, talking about saving the environment is corporate hypocrisy.
The whole concept of selling hard to repair smartphones with an enclosed battery that we cannot replace ouserselves by simply removing a back cover is total madness, from an environmental point of view. But that didn't stop us from buying them. So...a part of guilt is on us.
Last edited: