Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Just more CPU power is the only thing I want. It is too slow right now. It needs more Apps on the watch and the ability to run them quickly enough to not be frustrating to use. Thinner will make it look a bit better. But it is still an Apple Watch and so will be utilitarian instead of a fashion statement. The bands are the fashion statement part and they are quite nice (and something I ignore because the utility of the sport band is so nice).

If I upgrade I may get the cheaper and lighter Sport version instead of the SS which I'm currently wearing. The SS does look nice. But it also kind of just looks like a computer watch. Why try to pretend it is some sort of fashion statement when it isn't.
 
I don't believe the Apple Watch will ever have a FaceTime camera. The watch isn't meant to be held in an unnatural position for the length of a FaceTime conversation. It works for phone calls because you don't have to hold it up to your face and can walk around with your arm down during a phone call. A FaceTime camera on the watch would look right up your nose and the screen is too tiny for it to be worth it. Not happening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ike1707
Steve's idea list is now blank so they need to try to figure it out on their own but design by committee always fails.

"In its first business plan of summer 1981, Apple had assumed that 2.2 million Macs could be sold between 1982 and 1985; that is about 47,000 units per month. However, the Mac was not brought to market until the beginning of 1984. After the community of the computer nerds (at least those who could afford the first Mac) had satisfied its buying frenzy, the sales of the Macintosh dropped dramatically to about 5,000 units per month.

Apple boss John Sculley could not change much about this either. In order to professionalize Apple’s management and marketing, Steve Jobs had enticed Sculley away from Pepsi with the sentence: “Do you want to spend the rest of your life selling sugared water or do you want a chance to change the world?“

Despite diverse management methods, Jobs and Sculley initially collaborated harmonically and were celebrated by the public as Apple’s “Dynamic Duo.” However, the Mac’s depressed distribution soon caused serious tensions to arise between Jobs and Sculley."
 
Well a friend went to the Apple Store last week to get an iPhone SE and an Apple Watch and they were sold out of both in the models he wanted.
 
Apple has dropped the ball when it comes to the watch but no one here is talking about it. They dropped the ball when it comes to HomeKit. What they should have done is made the killer app the ability to replace your keychain. If they partnered with the major automakers, and if they took full control of homekit and released first party, reasonably priced, homekit accessories that just worked the watch could be insanely useful. I am talking short range RFID like the Magic Bands at Disney so the battery life would not be impacted. They want to replace your wallet but that will never happen because even if they can replace your credit cards and rewards cards you will still have government issued cards and we all know that they will never catch up with technology so it is pointless. Replacing your keychain is equally as important and much more doable
 
You know what kind of turns me off about the Apple Watch? It's the way it's marketed as more of a fashion accessory than a tech. product.

I got the 42mm Apple Watch with the black sport band as an anniversary gift. For that reason, it's something that has a little bit of extra meaning for me. And sure, I wear it every day. But it's not one of Apple's products I'm chomping at the bit to upgrade as soon as a new version comes out.

I already managed to put a nasty scratch in the front glass when it rubbed up against a steel pole on the metro, only a week or so after I got it. You'd *think* they'd have inexpensive replacement front glass pieces they could swap, but NO! Apple wanted 2/3rds. of the price of the watch to switch it for a refurbished replacement. And to this day, I can't find anyone else servicing these watches. Just a few YouTube videos of people telling me to use the old toothpaste trick to buff out the scratches -- which won't work on one this deep.

And while I'd like the convenience of one of those magnetic clasp bands, Apple prices them as jewelry items instead of anything realistic. Look, Apple... you can twist my arm to hand over $99 for one of your new electronic pencils because it's actually a piece of electronics and lets me do things with a new iPad that I couldn't do with one before. But $149 or more just to strap my watch on my wrist with a different designed band? I gotta pass!
 
This isn't surprising. The watch still seems like a product that was made because analysts said they should make it and other companies were trying it rather than because Apple had real ideas or a market for it.
Apple was way too quick on this one.

Fortunately, wearables are absolutely the future. The tech just isn't mature enough yet.

Maybe getting in so early will give them an advantage. Either way I still feel people will look back and say it could have been done better...and later.
 
I bought an Amazon Echo last week. It's not 100% everything, but really, really useful. Apple's missing that market. Oh, and Alexa is much more responsive than Siri, which I mainly use now only for dictation and asking to dial phone numbers.
 
I'm not expecting an actual release until 2017. I am however expecting Apple to announced the second generation Apple Watch.
 
Customers don't want an Apple Watch because everyone has upgrade fatigue. Nobody wants to purchase a piece of jewelry that has to be replaced every 12 months because it has become obsolete.

True, they want to purchase a piece of jewelry every 12 months because they like the way it looks.

There's around 500 million potential customers for the Watch based on the number of activated iPhones worldwide. There's enough room there for everyone to get what they want and Apple to make massive profits.

But if they don't upgrade every year or even sooner, then they are losing both new customers who have already passed on the watch, and customers who will buy the new model because it looks nice. It's not unusual for people who wear watches to buy several watches, some as often as every year or two, and now that Apple has made it possible to pair more than one watch with a phone, that makes it even more likely that such people will do it for an Watch.

At the end of the day, there's no reason anyone has to upgrade every year anyway, unless they want the new features. However, people do "upgrade" their fashions every year just because of the way it looks. And that's how I thought Apple was going to do this differently, but they seemingly thought they'd get buy on the cheap by doing it only with the bands.

It's the cynics in all of us who think Apple will drop support for a watch within 5 years like they do with the phones, but the reality is, the watches don't have to work that way, unless Apple continues to treat it like a tiny iPhone, and force upgrades to drive sales.

The iWatch is what happens when you run out of ideas. Steve's idea list is now blank so they need to try to figure it out on their own but design by committee always fails. The iWatch is an example of the slow rotting of Apple.

It's come out that Steve knew about the Watch. So, no. We've yet to see something Jobs wasn't involved in.

If Apple puts a facetime camera on this and not GPS it will prove they have no idea what the point of this product is.

Of course they do. If nothing else, a FaceTime camera will drive sales among the selfie-taking crowd. Nothing more convenient than having a camera embedded in your wrist when you want to take a spontaneous selfie.

This is incredibly evident by Tim Cook's comments during keynotes, and adding the ability to shoot photo bursts, and Retina Flash, not to mention improving the front facing camera well beyond what's necessary for FaceTime.
 
The FitBit type features are a good 50% of what justifies buying one, really. If you (like me) don't really care that much about that part of it? The "value" comes down to remote notifications, IMO. It's nice having the watch "ping" you with the haptic feedback and remind you of your next calendar appointment, vs. having to take the phone out of your pocket to view it. Same with text messages coming up on the watch, especially while you're driving and not supposed to be messing with your phone. You can glance at the watch while holding onto the steering wheel and see what just came in without much disruption at all. The fact you can respond to a text with a simple tap on a few pre-made responses (like "Yes", "No", "Call you later", etc.) means you can often do a reply in these situations too.

I'd say 90% of the apps for the watch are pointless, though. They're typically sluggish to launch and pull data from the phone, and they're cumbersome to navigate on the small watch face. Again, exceptions might be apps that allow remote control of basic things. (EG. Remote shutter trigger for the camera on your phone could be useful in certain situations.)


Unless you want to use it as a glorified fitbit, I'm still struggling to see the real use of an Apple Watch
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
There's no guarantee that the Apple Watch will ever become a smash hit, but remember- the iPad didn't really take off until the iPad 2 was released. If the Apple Watch 2 can do the same thing for the Apple Watch, it's going to have a bright future.

I was blow away by my original iPad, I knew it was going to be kickass product as it developed, just like the original iPod. With my Apple watch, while I like it, its just not the same WOW....I need this, and its going to get better...... yeah it will get better, but the initial premise, is lacking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
They can't predict that not knowing what a possible watch my have in store.
I know many people, myself included who waited out the first gen and have planned on getting the second gen from the start.

If the watch is great, I expect a huge uptick.
If it's only minor changes, then yeah
 
I really think the problem with the Apple watch is it just wasnt good enough. Not fast enough, not receptive enough, not small enough.

It feels like if Apple tried to deliver the iPhone in 2006. They could have, but it would have been a far lesser product.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.