Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Makes me giggle I must admit, when I think back to quite a few on these very forums stating that they think Apple would not update the watch for at least 5 years if not more.

How disillusion some people are.
Apple makes it's money from hardware sales, and how better to sell more hardware than to offer newer versions.

So many people warned you NOT to buy the 1st gen.

Myself, I'll happily get one, but only when it';s an independent device.

I haven't seen a single post from an Apple Watch owner who has said they regret their decision based on this information. I have only seen a lot of posts from people who do not own an Apple Watch telling us that we should regret our decision.

I personally think this rumor is great if its true since there is absolutely nothing here that would encourage me to upgrade. I really think people should post whether they own the watch when they opine, since I have got to the point where its pointless reading posts from people who haven't experienced it themselves yet. Those posts are only slightly less frustrating than the ones from people who clearly state that they would never get the watch but seem to spend all their time reading about it on forums. Did someone say 'envy'?

This is truly a product you have to experience for yourself. Reading about it, trying it on at the store, or trying on your friends watch is no substitute for actually using one for a month and realizing it is, and always will be, a watch with frills. Which is what most satisfied watch owners expected!
 
  • Like
Reactions: amirite
So if you bought the Edition model...
In about two years, it'll feel slow and lag major features, but have costed up to $17.000 for US customers, and more for others.
 
Hilarious news, there's no way a new model comes out in 2016 when they are just now putting the first one in stores. A 2nd will be announced next year but won't see release until 2017 just before summer. This device is a 2 year cycle at best. And the features listed are more then obvious, anyone can make those claims.

Actually, it would make sense for Apple to release a new watch every year so they'll be able to continue to sell the previous gen models at a lower price like they do with the iPhone/iPad.
 
I doubt if anyone that bought an Edition would post here.

There is a user here who posted pics his Edition in the Watch Forum, so there may be a couple here who actually own the watch. The post I replied to in this thread didn't make much sense to me. The user claims he doesn't like the looks he gets wearing the Edition and wishes they made an aluminum plated Edition, so it would have made more sense to buy the sport since it is aluminum.
 
Yeah, my first reaction as well. A watch is even less of a yearly upgrade device as compared to an iPad. People can't be happy about this.

I have an Apple Watch and remain totally indifferent to a new version next year. A new Apple Watch will not, despite poster's misuse of the word, make mine 'obsolete'. Also I could not possibly care less if Apple fills in the price points between $1K and $10K, it will have no effect whatsoever on my life.
 
Of course they are, which begs the question, why do people still flock to the first iteration of anything, especially from Apple. I've used the Apple watch extensively as my father gave my mother one for Mothers Day. She used it all of a week but got tired of having to charge it every nigh and she never used it for anything other than seeing what time it was, so away it went into her jewelry box never to bee seen again. That is until I asked if I could play with it for a week or so, she quickly replied that I could have it if I didn't tell my father. I gave it back to her after wearing it for a few days for similar reasons, well battery, plus I also thought it to be absolutely hideous looking on my wrist. Though an interesting idea, it just isn't something I would want to wear. Like the iPhone, the market is vastly becoming over saturated with them as well, bringing the exclusivity down to the level of a Swatch, albeit an expensive Swatch. I'm not a snob by any form of the definition but I hate feeling like I'm just another cog in a marketing machine. Everyone has an Apple something and they love to flaunt it out in public as if no one else has the exact same thing.

So I carry around a BlackBerry Passport, not only because it is a much better phone for me feature wise than the iPhone but I also don't see as many when I'm out and about. I wear a vintage Tag Monaco from the 70's that belonged to my grandfather, I will also own it for the rest of my life and than pass it on to my grandson when it's time, something that would be down right tacky if it was an Apple Watch. My computer is a Google Pixel II which I bought after owning and than returning the new Apple MacBook 12, I wanted a small and light machine to program on but the lack of, well, everything in the MacBook was just to much or I should say little for me to keep it. Since I use CloudEnvy a cloud based IDE, the Pixel II was an obvious choice for me.

I mentioned these products because their not only all fantastic but are also outside of this popularity circle that people feel the almost uncontrollable need to be in. A lot of them will buy say the iPhone without ever looking into what it can actually do or what an other company can offer, Apple knows this so the can get away with things like, not allowing it's users to choose their own default apps or only installing 1GB of RAM on a 700 dollar plus phone, etc.

I'm completely done with Apple, the MacBook was the last straw, like those who blindly go with the crowd over the cliff, I to made the mistake. When what I wanted all the long were features that should be on every laptop over a grand now, like a touchscreen, at least two USB-C ports, HDMI/Display Port out, SD Card reader (which I will never own another device again without), etc.

This post might sound like I'm trolling against Apple and so be it but I'm done buying from a company that does everything in their power to control every aspect of it's users experience and over charging for products that are mediocre at best. Food for thought, it costs Apple $2.20 to make a watch band, the end consumer is charged 50.
 
Actually, they would care. Because the handful of ultra-wealthy people I know didn't get wealthy by buying $10k Apple watches, nor would they waste their money on such a useless vanity item. The people who did buy it aren't as rich as you think they are, and will probably be quite pissed off at how short of lifespan Apple Watch will have.

Version two being released doesn't end the life span of version one. How many people posting here are still using iPhone 4 and 4s?
 
There is a user here who posted pics his Edition in the Watch Forum, so there may be a couple here who actually own the watch. The post I replied to in this thread didn't make much sense to me. The user claims he doesn't like the looks he gets wearing the Edition and wishes they made an aluminum plated Edition, so it would have made more sense to buy the sport since it is aluminum.

Quite possibly. I'm not buying an Edition for the same reason I never bought a Rolex. While it is well within reach, if I need to impress someone by a show of wealth like that, the scene is not worth it to me. The ones that have always flaunt "I have it!" never impressed me. Not to mention the type of sport model women you pull in from that -- ewww!
 
I've never used Face Time on any of my Apple products, and I have no interest in using it on my watch. I thought it was silly when Dick Tracy used it in the comic strips.

I have used the Dick Tracy option only a few times. While I'm impressed with the technology. The UX is lacking. Unless you have a Bluetooth headset, you are on a speakerphone. Even then, if you have a Bluetooth headset paired, you use the watch for starting and ending the call. Also it displays how long the call goes. About the only practical time I have used the Dick Tracy option was when it was a group call with myself and others around me talking to the person on the watch. Also, keeping your arm up to talk is fatiguing on the arm.
 
I didn't say no one does it. Overall, most people upgrade every two years due to the way mobile contracts are structured. It is common knowledge.

Common knowledge? Maybe in the Netherlands. We have early upgrades that happen every 12-18 months. Not to mention that most U.S. carriers have done away with contracts and have shifted to 0% financing, which encourages yearly upgrades. Maybe you shouldn't make such broad assumptions?
 
Quite possibly. I'm not buying an Edition for the same reason I never bought a Rolex. While it is well within reach, if I need to impress someone by a show of wealth like that, the scene is not worth it to me. The ones that have always flaunt "I have it!" never impressed me. Not to mention the type of sport model women you pull in from that -- ewww!

I think there are a lot of people who own fine watches because they like them and don't do to show off. Buy it for yourself, not to impress others.
 
Actually...more than having a better Siri, I prefer a faster Siri. The time it takes for voice translation to sending out is awful.
 
I think there are a lot of people who own fine watches because they like them and don't do to show off. Buy it for yourself, not to impress others.

That money has a lot better places to go than for a status band on my wrist. However, $2K to $3K for a titanium Apple Watch ... that could work.
 
coffeemadmanUK

On a personal level, which admittedly is non-scientific and purely anecdotal, I have seen richer people who have cheaper cars, perhaps a "normal" TV screen, and satellite/cable that suits what they want.

It's the "poorer" who I have seen with the more expensive cars, larger TV's and all the channels possible on satellite/cable
.

I live in a very wealthy part of the UK, and you’re dead right. Some of the richest (and titled) people I know drive beat-up cars and live in large, valuable but very scruffy houses. It’s always the nouveaus who have the immaculate homes, the shiny new Mercs and the huge TVs.

I manage to live in a scruffy house, drive a beat up car AND be broke. Best of both worlds.
 
I find it impossible to consider what I find to be the orgy of hubris that is the Apple Watch without thinking fondly of P.T. Barnum. It is instructive to see how many people, including many on this site, will buy literally anything that Apple spits out, regardless of what it is, simply because it is Apple, and therefore they must have it. The Apple Suppository must be somewhere in the product pipeline, "the most intimate device Apple has ever created".

There is not only one born every minute, but hundreds or thousands.

There are more Apple products that I do not own than ones I do own. The Apple Watch is one of the Apple products that I own and I find it very useful.
 
LOL, if you think Apple would pass up the opportunity of upgrading their watch and putting it out there before Xmas then you may want to take Marketing 101.
it's not about Market 101 it's about B2C... Doing something like that would ruin Apple with their fan base. It's a direct slap in the face. Apple is not Samsung where they do not value good customer relation. It means nothing to Apple to rush out and put another watch out. Any smart business would milk the current product and release a new one when customer are begging for more. Apple is always 2-3 design (road map) ahead. This doesn't mean the device will be release anytime soon, it's just part of the roadmap as to would may/would be next.
 
I find it impossible to consider what I find to be the orgy of hubris that is the Apple Watch without thinking fondly of P.T. Barnum. It is instructive to see how many people, including many on this site, will buy literally anything that Apple spits out, regardless of what it is, simply because it is Apple, and therefore they must have it. The Apple Suppository must be somewhere in the product pipeline, "the most intimate device Apple has ever created".

There is not only one born every minute, but hundreds or thousands.

Your statement would be correct if Apple was introducing new products that were actually new to the market. This is not the case.

You can bet if I was in the market for a smart watch I would most likely get one made by Apple because they do it right compared to others.
 
Last edited:
it's not about Market 101 it's about B2C... Doing something like that would ruin Apple with their fan base. It's a direct slap in the face. Apple is not Samsung where they do not value good customer relation. It means nothing to Apple to rush out and put another watch out. Any smart business would milk the current product and release a new one when customer are begging for more. Apple is always 2-3 design (road map) ahead. This doesn't mean the device will be release anytime soon, it's just part of the roadmap as to would may/would be next.

I doubt it would make much difference at all. Apple's user base is so huge and diverse people will buy it regardless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sracer
it's not about Market 101 it's about B2C... Doing something like that would ruin Apple with their fan base. It's a direct slap in the face. Apple is not Samsung where they do not value good customer relation. It means nothing to Apple to rush out and put another watch out. Any smart business would milk the current product and release a new one when customer are begging for more. Apple is always 2-3 design (road map) ahead. This doesn't mean the device will be release anytime soon, it's just part of the roadmap as to would may/would be next.

Doubtful. You're taking this way too personally. It's not about keeping the existing customers happy by not releasing anything new too soon. Apple is not your friend. Those customers bought the watch and they knew what they were buying and they were obviously satisfied. Upgrades can happen at any time. It's business and it doesn't sound like you've been an Apple customer for very long. I've been using Macs exclusively for 17+ years and Apple most certainly has put out a new product, trumping the older one within a few short months after upgrading the older one. Nothing new. No loss of customer base, obviously.
 
So if you bought the Edition model...
In about two years, it'll feel slow and lag major features, but have costed up to $17.000 for US customers, and more for others.
So? The average person who blows $17k on a watch can afford to blow $17k on a watch much more than the average person can afford to blow $349 on a watch.
 
Bad news for the early adopters.
Why?

EVERY piece of technology is upgraded, and usually within a year or so.

Makes no sense why early adopters would think of this as bad news.

Bad News would be that the watch sold so bad that Apple decided to discontinue and not support the Apple Watch anymore. It's GOOD news for current owners that Apple will continue to develop for the Apple Watch.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.