Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Let's say worst case and most unlikely scenario: you interact with your Watch for 30 seconds each time, so with the stated 5 hours of life, you could get potentially 600 30 second interactions which should be plenty!

Again, this is worst case scenario and Apple is recommending 10 second interactions to devs for app designs. :)

I know right, remember its a watch, not a phone. You wont be watching an hour long show on your watch, or a two hour movie, or be playing a graphic intensive game....geez
 
I heard that the new apple watch can monitor BAC levels. Is this true? Or monitor it in such a way that they can give a fairly accurate reading through the various health sensors on it.

This would be great. Also tying it in with keyless entry for cars, and the watch will automatically prevent you from turning on your car :p
 
here your $10,000 gold watch...with 5 hours of battery life :eek:

So are people intentionally being obtuse? 5 hours of HEAVY USE is not 5 hours battery life. :rolleyes: The fact that original rumors pegged this at 2.5 hours say to me that battery life is going to be better than expected.
 
this is a really bad sign for the longevity of the watch. sure, it'll last all day with normal use out of the box. but what about a year from now? as with an iPhone, will you have to take your watch off at noon to charge it to last the rest of the day? by year 2 of owning the watch...?

this seems to be a major impediment to buying an apple watch.
 
Why would you take any notice of what the person trying to sell you something tells you anyway?

Believe it or not, most CEO's don't go around around constantly saying something as fact, only to have it later be found out as completely false. Yes, there are some that do, I won't say everyone is innocent. But Cook has been, up to this point, very open and honest.

When Apple gets up on stage and tells you your future iPad is X mm's thin, do you bust out your ruler when you buy one to see if they were being honest?
 
this is a really bad sign for the longevity of the watch. sure, it'll last all day with normal use out of the box. but what about a year from now? as with an iPhone, will you have to take your watch off at noon to charge it to last the rest of the day? by year 2 of owning the watch...?

this seems to be a major impediment to buying an apple watch.

Apple never said the battery couldn't be replaced. And what evidence do you have that the battery will degrade that much in one year?
 
IMHO, if they cut the screen refresh rate from 60fps to 30fps. it would not pose a significant impact to user experience, but if it increases battery life by even 1/2 a day, it would be worth it

That'd be the last thing Apple would do. Screen refresh and things feeling smooth has always been important to Apple, from the first Mac to the iPhone. That's how Android managed battery life until recently. Apple wants things to look and feel fluid, so no. That'd hurt the watch a lot.
 
A watch that lasts you all day is the reason you won't be buying one? How's this any different from the iPhone (or any iDevice for that matter)?

I'd say that a watch is slightly different to an iPad or an iPhone. Say, I went on a camping trip for a couple of days, I'd want my watch to work all the time.

Obviously, it depends on one's situation. I'm comfortable with recharging it every day, but I can see how it would be a deal breaker for some.
 
Really doesn't sound appealing to me. Watch face going amber then red to constantly remind me how crap the battery is. Lovely.

Where does it say the entire watch face will turn red? It's a glance, different from a watch face.
 
Hmmm... I'm not impressed with the watch yet. I'll wait for the "S" version next year.
 
thats not 5 hours of battery life.

thats 5 hours of heavy onscreen usage. not typical everyday usage.

to put it in comparison, they're managing 5 hours of onscreen time under heavy usage on what is probably a 400mwh battery.

in comparison, except for very few android phones, they're only managing 3-4 hours of typical onscreen time out of 2600+Mwh batteries.

screens, especially densely packed screens with fast refresh rates do take up a lot of power relative to their size.

i'm curious what Apple is doing to extend battery.

IMHO, if they cut the screen refresh rate from 60fps to 30fps. it would not pose a significant impact to user experience, but if it increases battery life by even 1/2 a day, it would be worth it

I'm not disputing that what you're saying is wrong, but no where does the article say it's "on-screen time," just "heavy usage," which can be pretty subjective depending on the user.
 
What a complete waste of "time" this device is.

so 5hours will be more like 3 based on the normal apple power claims..
no headline features
 
I think anyone who believes charging your watch daily is acceptable must be delusional. Get back to me when the Apple Watch lasts at least 3+ days with moderate use.
 
They can claim whatever - battery life of iPhones since 5 is dramatically horrible - 6-7 hours of active usage at most, while Samsung scores up to 8 and Sony (almost leader now) up to 10. And we are talking about constant usage, not stand-by. This is the reason they didn't talk about battery - nowadays its a shame topic for Apple.

For watch usage pattern is different, we will see from actual reports.

BTW, thank you early adopters for beta-testing the first version of Watch for us, so we can buy improved second version next year.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.