Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
this is a really bad sign for the longevity of the watch. sure, it'll last all day with normal use out of the box. but what about a year from now? as with an iPhone, will you have to take your watch off at noon to charge it to last the rest of the day? by year 2 of owning the watch...?

this seems to be a major impediment to buying an apple watch.

this would be Apple's plan. A year from now, you'd buy the upgraded version of the watch or have the battery replaced for $75. Chaching.
 
I'd say that a watch is slightly different to an iPad or an iPhone. Say, I went on a camping trip for a couple of days, I'd want my watch to work all the time.

Obviously, it depends on one's situation. I'm comfortable with recharging it every day, but I can see how it would be a deal breaker for some.

So activate the power reserve mode as you won't have reception anyway.

Easy, isn't it?
 
I'm not surprised. it took Apple until the iPhone 6 Plus to upgrade the battery to a decent 2,915 mAh which still is horrible compared to the 3,200mAh on the Galaxy Note 4 and 3,000mAh on LG G3...etc. Android wear smartwatches come with 300-400 mAh and last up to 2-3 days depending on usage. My ASUS Zenwatch lasts 3 days. My Michael Bastian Cronowing smartwatch lasts up a week and a half long of battery life. 5 hours of battery life on heavy usage is what 80% of users will using. With the newly announced LG Watch Urbane with 300 mAh and Huawei Watch with 400 mAh, they will truly outshine Apple watch as Android smartphones have performed circles on iPhones since 2010 and will continue to do so unless Apple wakes up and actually innovates.
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
 
What happens after 1 year (~400 charge cycles), when the battery will no long hold a charge? There's been no mention of that.
 
Yet another device to put on charge overnight. Another device that you could look at that will be dead on your wrist.

The only thing that would make it viable is if there was a "dock" of sorts to lay your watch into to charge it when not in use. I don't want to be plugging in a watch like I plug in my phone and Macbook every day.

charging every night? How will it track my sleep data?

Sleep tracking is half the reason I would want this thing.

You beat me to it! While demonstrated not to be quite accurate at measuring sleep tracking, I do like this feature of the FitBit. That said, I still want the watch.

:cool:

--DotComCTO

This thing is small so I don't think it's going to take a long time to charge. I'd like to track sleep data too, so I'll probably throw it on the charger while I'm doing something else in the evening and then put it back on before bed. Shouldn't be that big of a production to do this.
 
If I need my phone to use the watch, why would I store music on the watch? I would already have my phone on me and I can get all my music from there. Plus how would I listen to the music stored on the watch?
 
5 hours of heavy use is alot guys. thats like sitting down fiddling with it for five hours straight. I don't think most of us are gonna even come close to that. Its always gonna be on our wrist, say we use it for a solid 10 minutes per hour of our waking day, thats a little over two hours of constant use, the rest of the time the display will be off, so i think this is great news!

I don't even have 5 hours of heavy use per day on my iPhone on the vast majority of days.
 
I'll wait for 2nd gen that will have better battery life.

$350 for 5 hours of heavy usage won't do it for me.
 
I think anyone who believes charging your watch daily is acceptable must be delusional. Get back to me when the Apple Watch lasts at least 3+ days with moderate use.

This is a smartwatch, not a regular watch. People got used to charging their phones everyday instead of every 7 days. Or their Kindle every day instead of every 30 days.


Oh and the Pebble is not a true full-fledge smartwatch.
 
So activate the power reserve mode as you won't have reception anyway.

Easy, isn't it?

Why does going on a hike mean I wouldn't have reception? At least in the UK, a lot of rural places can still have a good 3G signal.

Anyway, there are a myriad of reasons why people wouldn't want to recharge their watch every night. Just because recharging it will work fine for you doesn't mean it's not a valid reason for another person to pass on buying it.
 
I'm not surprised. it took Apple until the iPhone 6 Plus to upgrade the battery to a decent 2,915 mAh which still is horrible compared to the 3,200mAh on the Galaxy Note 4 and 3,000mAh on LG G3...etc. Android wear smartwatches come with 300-400 mAh and last up to 2-3 days depending on usage. My ASUS Zenwatch lasts 3 days. My Michael Bastian Cronowing smartwatch lasts up a week and a half long of battery life. 5 hours of battery life on heavy usage is what 80% of users will using. With the newly announced LG Watch Urbane with 300 mAh and Huawei Watch with 400 mAh, they will truly outshine Apple watch as Android smartphones have performed circles on iPhones since 2010 and will continue to do so unless Apple wakes up and actually innovates.

This is what Apple marketing is up against. People who think 2915 is horrible compared to 3000. Or that 80% of people will fiddle with their watch for 5 hours a day. No wonder they're just sticking the thing on the wrists of pretty chicks.
 
As one would expect, it sounds like they've been doing a lot of work on optimizing the battery situation.

5 hours of "heavy" use is A LOT. I don't think I've ever used my iPhone or iPad for 5 hours in a day other than for phone calls. I can't imagine sitting down and poking away at the watch for that long. Betwixt the optimizations and Power Reserve mode, this should be just fine for most people's needs.

I don't really mind taking it off to charge it at night. I take my FuelBand off every night as it is regardless of battery level - I just don't like the feeling of it on my wrist while sleeping.
 
its 5 hours of Heavy Usage and on-screen time.

That is insane battery life for a device so small.

It's like you dolts are expecting to be looking at your watch all day tinkering with it. That's not the use case for it!

Be practical folks...
 
They can claim whatever - battery life of iPhones since 5 is dramatically horrible - 6-7 hours of active usage at most, while Samsung scores up to 8 and Sony (almost leader now) up to 10. And we are talking about constant usage, not stand-by. This is the reason they didn't talk about battery - nowadays its a shame topic for Apple.

For watch usage pattern is different, we will see from actual reports.

BTW, thank you early adopters for beta-testing the first version of Watch for us, so we can buy improved second version next year.

Who can claim? We don't know who these sources are but it's pretty certain no higher ups at Apple are leaking to 9to5Mac. If it's people actually using the device I'll trust their opinion over people here who've never seen it nor used it.
 
If I need my phone to use the watch, why would I store music on the watch? I would already have my phone on me and I can get all my music from there. Plus how would I listen to the music stored on the watch?


Um...bluetooth speakers.

I do that today with my Moto360.
 
They can claim whatever - battery life of iPhones since 5 is dramatically horrible - 6-7 hours of active usage at most, while Samsung scores up to 8 and Sony (almost leader now) up to 10. And we are talking about constant usage, not stand-by. This is the reason they didn't talk about battery - nowadays its a shame topic for Apple.

For watch usage pattern is different, we will see from actual reports.

BTW, thank you early adopters for beta-testing the first version of Watch for us, so we can buy improved second version next year.

You're welcome. We usually buy new devices whenever we want, so if 2nd gen is that great, we'll buy that one, too.

LOL.

Sometimes, I really am amused on here.
 
This is fine. I can tell you, if you spend 5 HOURS a day using the watch, you have a problem.

Hey, Apple is the one telling us how awesome the device will be to use with all of the applications that will be available for it. They demonstrated a device with tons of apps.

So now you're saying Apple doesn't want us using the watch as intended?

Justify it all you want, 5 hours of heavy usage is not good. Especially with other options out there that will easily last the whole day with heavy usage.
 
just wait until after 2 years when the battery degraded to 70% capacity and you have to charge it in the afternoon - oh wait by that time you're wearing an outdated piece of electronics anyway;)
 
This is fine. I can tell you, if you spend 5 HOURS a day using the watch, you have a problem.

Only time I could MAYBE see this happening is on a long flight. But, that happens with phones on long flights, too. Which is why I wind up carrying my iPad.
 
Hmm.. a deliberate leak to temper expectations before Monday.

Astonishing to think that people are going to accept a 5 hour battery life on a watch.. an item that people have come to accept many years of battery life on!

And I just love the defences being offered regarding this.. that somehow 5 hours of continuous use is irrelevant because no-one will use it that much. So wait, the defence of a terrible battery life is that you won't be using this shiny new device too much?! It doesn't matter that the battery is terrible, because you're just buying it as a fashion accessory, rather than an electronic device that you want to USE..?!

I suspect that Monday will see a trembling of the 'reality distortion field' that hasn't been felt for a long long time....
 
How long will it take to charge?

If this thing will really last 5 hours in use, then sleep tracking isn't out of the question. Heavy use for 10 min every hour will only drain about half the battery by the time you get to bed, and at that point you can just go into battery save/airplane mode. Track your sleep at night, plug it in the next morning while you're getting ready and you're all set. The battery is so small that I don't see it taking longer to charge than a shower and teeth brushing.

Sounds small but one of my favorite things about my Jawbone (when I wore it) was the vibrating alarm on my wrist in the mornings. A much better way to wake up than growing to hate whatever sound comes from your alarm clock/phone.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.