Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What some goofy colored watch bands. Makes them look like kiddie watches you find in a cereal box. No professional would be caught dead in one of those.

article-P-24cf64d0-b459-4b6d-ab0d-5816272da4da-6STz2vpAn-HSK1-466_634x356.jpg


No professionals? Not even the CEO of the highest-valued company on the planet?
 
Considering the nature of my job it gets old checking my iPhone Plus every 5 seconds to make sure I didn't miss an important notification, and its actually surprising how many notifications I do tend to miss (whether its on sound or on vibrate). I've also been waiting for a FitBit like solution, so the Apple Watch would suit both these needs. A mere turn of the wrist to keep up to date on the latest notifications instead of fumbling around for my iPhone wherever the heck I left it is worth the price of entry for me (although I will likely opt for the Sport edition to save on the cost).

I don't typically wear a watch and wasn't interested in this when it first was reported.... But as with you I do get a ton of notifications daily and it would be nice to be able to flip the wrist to see what it is rather than pull out my 6+. This is pretty much the reason I'll be getting one. Some may not think it's a big deal but when you're dealing with patients, charts, meds, ect ect sometimes your hands are full and it's tough to pull out the phone.
 
strange that there's no dictaphone app...i'm using iphone's dictaphone app quite often to quick record musical ideas
 
Last edited:
I love all the hate here, so amusing. Do people forget that the basic 16gb iPhone costs $649? You don't see that as most sign two-year contracts or have the carrier subsidize their phones, so to me $349 for this new tech and something that is of course made extremely well and from what I have seen is pretty darn sweet, take my money now.

Do you think it's also amasing that people are throwing thier money at a product before even seeing or holding it in person? ;)

Fyi, the bargain that is the watch is, $649+$349. The cheapest option ;)

----------

Image

No professionals? Not even the CEO of the highest-valued company on the planet?

I was thinking about that last night, if Tim would be wearing one. Given how uncomfortable he was announcing the price, maybe he also feels uncomfortable wearing one. Maybe the bloke is just modest.
 
You misunderstand.

Usually when something gets invented or discovered it takes awhile to find a real use case for it.

Right now that thing you put on your wrist has no clear direction. It's a watch, a running/jogging tool, an exercise buddy, a watch that links to your phone, a watch that has personal medical ID on it, and a watch that helps you pay for things. I never said lacks direction. If I did I mistyped. I said it has no clear direction.

If I asked you what does a watch do can you answer that question with one sentence?

Phone - Used to communicate with people from a distance.
Computer - Used to process data into meaningful forms
Car - Used to travel at a distance
Watch - Used to tell time? Used to sync to your phone? Oh I Know - A watch is used as a jogging assistant. But I thought it was used to tell time. What's a watch?

Right now the idea of the watch paradigm is shifting before your very eyes. It's changing. A watch is no longer a watch. But what is it? Right now. No one knows but it's changing. Once the metamorphosis is completed that watch will be completely different and it will be required to live day to day. It won't be a watch anymore but it'll still be called a watch. Your grand kids will ask you why is it called a watch when it's used to monitor your health for example. You won't be able to answer it like you do now.

Why is your smart phone still called a phone? Clearly you can do a lot more with it than just "a system that converts acoustic vibrations to electrical signals in order to transmit sound, typically voices, over a distance using wire or radio."
Your questions above are NOT answered correctly.....A phone is not only used to communicate with people, Computer is NOT only used for processing data, a car is NOT only used to travel a distance and watch is now a multi use tool for every day living.... pay for your coffee with it, get updates on weather, stocks, texts ect with it. Yes it is a workout buddy and yes it can track your runs.....Why do you need it to focus on one thing? It does all these things... for good or bad it does them.
 
I don't typically wear a watch and wasn't interested in this when it first was reported.... But as with you I do get a ton of notifications daily and it would be nice to be able to flip the wrist to see what it is rather than pull out my 6+. This is pretty much the reason I'll be getting one. Some may not think it's a big deal but when you're dealing with patients, charts, meds, ect ect sometimes your hands are full and it's tough to pull out the phone.

I dunno about that. You'll need a free hand to click on and navigate through the messages on the watch. While easier than a phone, I don't know how it's possible to use the watch if your hands are full. Unless you were talking about it figuratively.
 
I dunno about that. You'll need a free hand to click on and navigate through the messages on the watch. While easier than a phone, I don't know how it's possible to use the watch if your hands are full. Unless you were talking about it figuratively.
I can point a finger with something in my hand... I can't reach into my pocket for my phone with something in my hand. Trust me.... I've tried lol.
 
Now if the Watch was able to do something completely out of the ordinary such as give accurate blood glucose checks with out pricking the skin then that would be worth the $$$.

Yeah...we all need constant glucose level checks! You should work for Apple because your idea would sell MILLIONS!
 
I'll get one in 3 - 4 years when it's insanely cheap.

We don't know yet what the product update interval will be, a new watch every year or two years? What can be added to this watch software wise? It's major shortcoming is obviously the battery life so Apple is likely to play on this notion with every release cycle.
 
The space grey sport watch has my interest, but I'll still need to see it in person. The fact they charge so much for a dressier band puts me off, however.
 
I want to be excited about this, I really do but until I can go for a run with it, with my music (or some at least) and not have my phone strapped to me its a no from me.
 
Well, I paid £250 for my watch just to show me the time, so I can not really say the watch is overpriced, since it can do so much more.

Chances are, I will get one, but most likely 'only' the sport edition.
 
I've read most of them. This is different.

This is Apple going for the mass consumer market. Unlike previous devices and unlike other SmartWatch manufacturers, they're not really selling technology.
That is, they're targeting watch buyers rather than tech buyers.

The traditional marketing approach is to go for early adopters and then expand out. Google Glass did this, and the Samsung smart watches are doing this.
The problem then is expanding out into a bigger market. Instead, Apple is bypassing the early adopters and targeting those who can afford to treat themselves or their loved ones to a personal gift.

Personally, I'm also not sure I can see a use for it, but there will be a lot of people looking for a new watch who will pick this up because it's new and does something different to other watches. The existing watch market is basically pointless above a very low threshold but it still thrives. You could see the very odd situation where a new piece of tech is not seen as cool by the techies, but is perceived that way by the non-techies.
 
Give it some time

Personally I'd never own one of these. Just like the iPhone thick and has been slimmed down as the years go on and the technology develops to smaller and smaller. Charge every night ? :eek: WTF just more cables / charger's to carry with you.

I really like apple but there always playing catchup to what other companies have already done
 
Seriously underwhelmed if I am honest, although I have never really bought into this smart watch fad. The fact you need your phone next to you to even do relevant things with it just makes me wonder why not be so lazy send simply lift your 1000 dollar phone out of your pocket and use that.

The price is super crazy, dont like the design and the whole zooming in UI concept looked crap.
 
Watch Faces

When you look at the details for the Sport vs. Stainless Watch, the Sport version doesn't show as many watch faces. I liked how the Stainless Watch has faces showing your next appointment. I didn't see these listed when scrolling through the Sport face options. Does anyone know if they are in fact the same on both?
 
When you look at the details for the Sport vs. Stainless Watch, the Sport version doesn't show as many watch faces. I liked how the Stainless Watch has faces showing your next appointment. I didn't see these listed when scrolling through the Sport face options. Does anyone know if they are in fact the same on both?

As far as we know all versions of the watch will have the same hardware and operating system. The only differences between the models are in the case and strap materials.
 
This is Apple going for the mass consumer market. Unlike previous devices and unlike other SmartWatch manufacturers, they're not really selling technology.
That is, they're targeting watch buyers rather than tech buyers.

The traditional marketing approach is to go for early adopters and then expand out. Google Glass did this, and the Samsung smart watches are doing this.
The problem then is expanding out into a bigger market. Instead, Apple is bypassing the early adopters and targeting those who can afford to treat themselves or their loved ones to a personal gift.

Personally, I'm also not sure I can see a use for it, but there will be a lot of people looking for a new watch who will pick this up because it's new and does something different to other watches. The existing watch market is basically pointless above a very low threshold but it still thrives. You could see the very odd situation where a new piece of tech is not seen as cool by the techies, but is perceived that way by the non-techies.

I believe the main point here is that Apple Edition watch is technology product trying to be life style investment product. As many know high end mechanical automatic watches hold their value very well. For example the most expensive non-diamond wrist watch is Patek Philippe from 1943 (watch ref. 1527) (current value aprox. $5.50 million) has gain in value tremendously over the years so one can view them as an investment. However, can product like Apple Edition Watch which has no use in few years be good investment. We shall see.

When treating some one with truly personal gifts, people tend to favor something that can stand the test of times. It is as if the gift needs to last longer than any personal relationship is ever humanly possible and hence the gift of classic watch is made.
 
Yes, you are not alone... I'm sure that reassured your greatly in some way.
So, instead of this 1000th time reiterated view, you could have actually said precisely what you expected more.

I don't really care if I'm alone in my thoughts are not. I also will leave my thoughts precisely as I stated them.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.