Definitely shower with it.
I wouldn't think it would hold enough water.
Definitely shower with it.
Your whole body gets wet when you shower? Pfft, amateur. I don't even get my pinky wet.
Did you bathe in liquipel a few years ago?
What a waste of money!! Why by a piece of electronics that is tethered to an iPhone? Instead just use your iPhone and get a Fitbit or similar which is a lot cheaper. Now if the Watch was able to do something completely out of the ordinary such as give accurate blood glucose checks with out pricking the skin then that would be worth the $$$.
Your whole body gets wet when you shower? Pfft, amateur. I don't even get my pinky wet.
Yes, it does seem that that should be the case with IPX7.
Maybe they don't want to confuse people with 'surface swimming' vs. underwater swimming?
Thanks. I was accurate in that the link you provided did not say.
I still wouldn't risk it. I doubt Apple will be handing out replacements very easily on that claim.
You could have done the 1 second Google/Wiki search even before doing the initial comment. Yet, you didn't.
pretty ridiculous that you can't delete the watch app from your phone.
It should have just been placed in the appstore.
my "stuff i don't use" folder just increased by 1...
especially when 90% of us won't even have the stupid watch. Oh well, something will pop up in cydia to delete it.![]()
How do you smell?
----------
You could have done the 1 second Google/Wiki search even before doing the initial comment. Yet, you didn't.
It could happen, but probably not as soon as they did for the original iPhone.
Today they reduced the price of the Apple TV from $99 to $69.
Forced advertisement. Many users will probably be influenced by it to purchase an Apple Watch.
I don't think so, at least not in the US.
I'm betting that price drop had to do with HBO making Apple TV the only subscribing service. It was probably part of the deal to put the service in more hands.
So many negative reactions on these forums, kinda funny how people still haven't used the device.
A market with very limited use cases. I think companies are gambling a losing battle. It's a fad for now. Yes it grew 10 fold but it'll pass and die out like any other fad.
The company that can make a real need use case for a smart watch will win the market. Apple has an idea to use it with health kit, medical research, and medical ID. Is that the direction to take the smart watch is for your health? Maybe.
Point is: Smart watches have no direction. No one has a clue where to take it besides Apple. Apple has an idea. Everyone else is kind of just throwing a bunch of crap in the smart watch and hoping it sticks.
Here the base model is $499 AUD for the small one. But the kicker is the top model, we're talking new car money for one of those. Yes I know there are much more expensive watches in the world which people by but why such a price difference for a bit of gold when it doesn't do anything different and doesn't look any better?
How can you possibly say this with a straight face. What is "thrown in" on the LG G/R watch. Or the Moto 360. Or the Pebble.
Apple is no better/no worse. They've thrown in a lot of "crap" into their OS as well. There are some great things (like Apple Pay accessibility) etc - but you clearly have NO experience with other smart watches if you think they are just throwing in a bunch of crap COMPARED to Apple.
Where's theverge first impressions? They weren't impressed and they love Apple.
Didn't Tim Cook say he showers with this thing? Could've sworn I read that on here a week or 2 ago.