Well soon millions will be wearing them everywhere, and maybe then you'll be more impressed.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Watch Makes U.S. Magazine Cover Debut In Latest Issue of 'Self'
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Well soon millions will be wearing them everywhere, and maybe then you'll be more impressed.
Dude, give it up already. Enjoy your limited edition gear device. Limited because nobody is buying them. Your ignorance and dislike of Apple isn't adding anything here.
Geeze, give that poor girl some food!
That's called body shaming fyi. She doesn't need to fit your idea of what's physically attractive. She looks great.
Yet, it can operate on its own. So, not sure what your point is or who are those mysterious irked "people". It doesn't offer all its services on its own, but it certainly does operate all by itself. Unless you think for example that working as a bluetooth Ipod is worth nothing at all?
Pretty sure people that will actually buy it will be well versed in its intricacy even though you might think they're all idiots.
For those irked people. They can buy those super watches that work all by themselves and use it as such. If they work all by themselves, not working with IOS shouldn't be an issue...
I'm carrying it for her. I guess that means I need to stay within 10 meters of her, doesn't it?
----------
Geeze, give that poor girl some food!
OK, I will volunteer for that.
How about some seafood at Seattle's Crab Pot, some nice conversation, and then she and I can walk around the waterfront and have dessert atop the Space Needle.
That's what I do. Solve world hunger, two people at a time.
Can't wait to get mine!
April can't come fast enough.
I hope they do pre-orders!
It looks fabulous!
April can't come fast enough.
I hope they do pre-orders!
It looks fabulous!
Do you realize that Apple's Apps do NOT require an iPhone to work? Only THIRD PARTY apps (at launch) will require an iPhone to work. Eventually, Apple will stop that restriction. But for now, THIRD PARTY apps DO require the iPhone, but apps originally installed on the phone do NOT.
So, there is nothing 'fishy' about not having an iPhone on one's body when wearing an Apple Watch. It's totally fine.
No, but you can count on the last day of April.
----------
The article says GPS through the iPhone.
Exactly what I was going to say! Back pocket?
HAHA! I upvoted your post, that quick death part gave me a pretty good chuckle!
You're not suppose to place your phone in the back pocket or else it bends. Didn't you learn anything after the iphone 6 was released? And judging from her size a iPhone 6 plus would cover half her butt.
So i need to take my iPhone when i'm running? I have now an armband to put the iPhone in to carry it around my arm. I thought i only would need now is the watch with a running app ?? More weight.....
You don't need to take your iPhone with you running.
But, I bet manufacturers will create secure hip-pockets to hold iPhones for those who do want to. Putting an iPhone on your hip is not as noticeable as on your wrist. Previously, this was not an option, because you needed to pull your iPhone out to look at it while running, but now you don't.
So other than using it as a $350 to $2000 plus MP3 player and time piece what else can you do with the watch when it's not connected to the phone? Apple has already nixed the heart rate monitor so you can't do that while running.
Eventually you're going to have to connect the watch to keep the apps up to date unless you like old info.
And by me being so important I need to know if my wife or kids call or text me. Maybe I will leave a message on my voicemail explaining that I'm out and about with my Apple Watch without my phone. That should work.
