You're overthinking it. The headline actually says "Apple Watch Orders Estimated to Average 30,000 Per Day in U.S. After Initial Surge"
Apparently the poster you responded to doesn't understand what average means. Or they intentionally ignored it to make their point seem relevant.
No, I'm just reading the headline and looking at the graph. I wouldn't consider an "initial surge" to last only one day!
So if the graph is accurate, the average has leveled off to less than 20,000/day - now that the first few weeks have passed.
But I don't know why it labels the graph as a "projection" when the dates are all historical. It's an estimate, of course. But a projection?
All I was really saying is the headline is misleading. And probably deliberately so.
I realize there will be peaks for holiday shopping and so forth, but the
current rate comes out at less than 7 million annually, whereas the headline figure works out to over 10 million annually. To some people, these differences matter
a lot, and they'd rather mislead than simply confront the reality. Considering orders only started in April, it's
conceivable these numbers could approximate the totals for the calendar year - surge, holidays, and all.
The point is that demand is down to a significantly lower volume than they want it to be, so they find a way to state that it's close to what they wish were true.