Apple said they expected sales to be modest for the watch.
THey sold 150million iphone in 2014? 70+million Q1 2015 , 10-15million is modest .
Apple said they expected sales to be modest for the watch.
Nice comments about the watch...
CNBC's Jim Cramer said Monday the nearly 1 million pre-orders estimated for the Apple Watch point to long-run success for the tech giant.
"This is now a 2016 phenomenon because by that time, everyone will know that you have to have this device. People under 25 have never had this device. Suddenly, they're going to wear it because it's part of their ecosystem," Cramer said in an interview on CNBC's "Squawk on the Street."
THey sold 150million iphone in 2014? 70+million Q1 2015 , 10-15million is modest .
The iPhone is a tried and true product. The watch is a new product and previous attempts at a watch have failed spectacularly.
All that can be done with my iPhone 6. Why would I want to add another device that requires my iPhone to use its full functionality? That's not simplifying, that's complicating.
Until the technology (Broadcom wifi/bluetooth - maybe cellular in distant future - battery support) to produce a stand-alone wearable is available, this device is coming out of the gate crippled.
What does owning a BMW i3 matter? I have a '15 Audi RS 5 and a '14 BMW 535d. I collect watches as they're investment pieces that I appreciate. Invested in a new GMT Master II w/ Black and Blue Day/Night ceramic bezel (the first dual-tone ceramic bezel available, virtually indestructible), and love my mid-90's "Pepsi" edition GMT. One of my favourites is my Jaeger-LeCoultre Duomètre Sphérotourbillon Moon. Watches are investments in finely crafted timepieces.
Does this make me special? No. They're just "things". In the end, it doesn't matter. I appreciate what I have and work hard, not because they're desirable but because they're well made. Is the Apple Watch well made? Sure. Is it worth the price for what it offers now? Not at all. Perhaps the entry level models.
The issue will always be the technology. Investing $10k+ for a timepiece that will depreciate quickly due to a rapidly changing technological industry is throwing money down the drain. I'm fortunate enough in coming from an affluent family and many of my family friends are as well. The interesting aspect is most of them are very careful with their money (i.e. cheap). They wouldn't purchase a device that will depreciate quickly.
Apple would have been smart to allow top of the line editions to be upgraded by replacing the "guts" with a simple swap. Tech changes quickly, allowing 2-3 more years with new tech would assuage concerns while charging owners a profitable update premium instead of losing sales, a "win/win".
If you like the product go ahead and buy it. Its just that you are buying into a brand and the product itself is nothing special. There have been several studies done (you can look it up) where if you give people the same cake to taste, one being cheap, the other being expensive, they actually enjoy the more expensive cake more. The crazy thing is that its not just psychological, its also physiological that one cake was better than the other. So you and countless others might actually love everything about the watch, but the watch itself is not special in any way.Well, you've figured it all out it appears, everyone's criteria that is. God, is that you?
My earlier comments stand (regarding the judgments), and setting aside the asinine comment about mediocrity (at least as it relates to the technology in the device), one wonders why people feel so compelled to share their "astute insights" regarding mediocre devices with others who might not share their views. Nothing better to do with one's time, perhaps go kick some puppies would be a better use of it?![]()
apple is also an entirely different company than they were when the first iphone came out and considering it goes with the iphone they have established an enormously large market base for the watch.
what would you call modest in apples world?
btw what is the least selling apple product/model?
1. You're absolutely delusional.
2. I'm a naysayer of the Apple Watch but I saw the value in everything else you reference. I immediately knew the iPhone would transform the mobile phone industry. I knew the iPad was going to be massive for casual computing. I've been a huge proponent of the AppleTV, I just wish they'd do more with it. The Macbook Air, even though a bit of a stumble out of the gate, I knew was going to be huge with people. etc etc. I think the watch is an unusual misstep for Apple.
You have it backward. If you're ever buying any and you look up the reviews online, look at the negative reviews. They are the only honest reviews.Well, you are a naysayer of something you have not yet tried out - what can I say but "noted". We are all entitled to our opinion, it's just surprising how many guys are "glass is half empty" on stuff like this. Surely there must be some motivation to post negatively. If I am negative about something I rarely come to a fan site and post about it - so what is the motivation on these forums?
I met a taxi driver in Atlanta who told me he gets paid $5.00 per post to post negative comments - he sets up tons of fake Google accounts and sets up on lots of forums. I laughed when I heard it from him, but it's true! I sometimes wonder if the negative posts here are coming from my Taxi driver haha.
You have it backward. If you're ever buying any and you look up the reviews online, look at the negative reviews. They are the only honest reviews.
Slice Intelligence's sales projection is based on e-receipt data from 9,080 online shoppers that opted-in to have their inboxes tracked for email receipts
I'm a little confused about their methodology myself. From their site, it sounds like they have around 2 million users who supply them with e-receipts for their purchases, and they extrapolate sales based on that. However, the linked article doesn't mention the number 9,080 anywhere that I can see, despite it being quoted by dozens of other sites.
EDIT: I think they changed the text of the press release because now it reads:
Instead of:
Apple watch a misstep, I don't think so. I would buy one just to control my Apple TV alone.1. You're absolutely delusional.
2. I'm a naysayer of the Apple Watch but I saw the value in everything else you reference. I immediately knew the iPhone would transform the mobile phone industry. I knew the iPad was going to be massive for casual computing. I've been a huge proponent of the AppleTV, I just wish they'd do more with it. The Macbook Air, even though a bit of a stumble out of the gate, I knew was going to be huge with people. etc etc. I think the watch is an unusual misstep for Apple.
What kind of person opts-in to this???![]()
You're missing a couple of things.
1. Rolex has built a legacy in timekeeping. It wasn't always the symbol that it is now. It had to earn that.
2. Anyone who pays full MRSP on a gold Rolex is a sucker you should try to make money on immediately. You should ALWAYS be able to get a discount from a dealer on these. I recently looked into buying a 30k Rolex from an extremely reputable grey market dealer I always buy from and he was able to price it at 10k less for me.
You have it backward. If you're ever buying any and you look up the reviews online, look at the negative reviews. They are the only honest reviews.
Apple watch a misstep, I don't think so. I would buy one just to control my Apple TV alone.
I don't know
1. 1oz gold coin sells for $1200. Does the $17,000 gold WATCH have 14oz of gold?
2. Will Apple let you use the same gold bands on WATCH Gen2, 3, 4, etc?
3. Look what happened to all the 30-pin cables and peripherals.
4. And, be prepared to say good-bye to your new Lightning collection when iPhone 6S comes out.
You have it backward. If you're ever buying any and you look up the reviews online, look at the negative reviews. They are the only honest reviews.
Exactly how I feel.
I would get a SS watch with linked or Milanese loop and pay the price for it be a dumb watch and nothing else. (But we know it does more than just a dumb watch so the price is cheap)
1 - No and nor does Rolex - 60% mark up on those. About 90% on the steel ones.
2 - Yes probably for a few generations - the strap connections are very thin and will allow the watch to become progressively smaller over generations
3 - They are backward compatible with an adaptor. I use a few still.
4 - People that don't understand Lightning never will. It's incredible adaptable and programmable - USB C could have been the solution. But it was 3 years away and we'd not have had phones as thin with the chunky 30 pin. Lightning is not going anywhere for 5 years at least. I suspect Blueooth 4.2 - 5 and other wireless tech will take over in the future.
----------
Er... no. Samsung have hundreds of paid Schills. Many of them frequent here. Easy to spot. Normally very short, abusive responses. Less than 2 sentances and very little actual comment. And they post hundreds of them.
Also you have to remember the psychology of people. They will MOSTLY only bother commenting about something when they have something to complain about.
Tripadvisor is a prime example of all this. A few bad reviews can destroy a hotel and there are often negative reviews posted by other local hotels. It's insane thinking. Just makes people think that the entire city is a *****hole full of arrogant hotel owners. It's the internet. Believe nothing.
I think there will be a lot more people who feel that way than many think. A different strap changes the look considerably too. I think a lot of people buy fashion watches in this price range and this is something different, yet not radical looking.
The SS link is nice, it has a hefty feel to it. The Edition in rose gold with either the Red Modern Buckle or the Rose Gray Modern Buckle has a certain elegance and uniqueness to it. It also looks good with the white sport band. I really tried to keep my wife away from those.![]()
Anyone that buys a Rolex at any price point is a sucker.... and has no taste at all.
I'd argue the same about the Apple Watch, so now what?
I'd argue the same about the Apple Watch, so now what?
Rolex could go the way of pocket watch (or any nice mechanical piece for that matter), where the market won't expand in the very future and then decline and becomes a niche player in a very limited market place.
I mean that could happen if existing watch wearer and new generation prefer Apple Watch over traditional mechanical watches that just tell time, for their wrist, and don't find watch collecting a worthy hobby anymore.
Just saying it could happen. To myself I am holding off buying another Rolex until I have given Apple Watch enough chance to determine for myself if a Smart Watch (with little collector value) is going to occupy my wrist 100% of the time, and if I would still have an appetite wearing a piece of traditional watch for any occasion going forward.
The fitness/health tracking aspect may be the game changer.
IMO, a smartwatch isn't going to have collector value like a traditional watch. And why not still wear the traditional watch for special occasions? An Apple watch doesn't have to completely replace everything you currently own, especially if you like traditional mechanical watches. I don't see a Rolex owner giving up on owning and wearing a Rolex in favor of a smartwatch. If anything, I'd own both.