So, I am in the group that got fooled by Best Buy and now am depressed that I canceled my original Apple order with a delivery date of September 30. I've seen quite a few ship dates that have been moved forward by several weeks through Apple- the question is - should I try to order again through Apple in the hopes that I might be blessed with an earlier delivery date than quoted?
Mine shipped last night and it's coming directly from Apples manufacturer in China. It'll be here on Tuesday.
I did my first GPS test of theWatch Series 2 this morning, and it passed with flying colors. I ran for about an hour with just my watch and wireless headphones. (I left my iPhone 6 in the car in Airplane mode.) The key part of the run was a rugged single-track trail through the forest with switchbacks and heavy tree cover. The loop section I measured separately with the watch is exactly 5 miles. It is used for a local trail race, and I have run it hundreds of times. It is always challenging for GPS devices, especially when the leaves are on the trees. It goes up and down hills and in and out of valleys and it gives GPS devices fits. My trusty Garmin Forerunner 620xt does the best of any device I've ever owned. It usually measures 5 miles or very close (4.95-5.00). I briefly owned a Garmin Fenix 3 when they came out, and it struggled so much on this trail that I swapped it out for a replacement and then returned it. On one run of this course, it measured 4.35 miles. My older Garmins usually came in at 4.85-4.95. My iPhone 6 does well, but I thought that might be the product of having a larger antenna. I was curious to see how Apple's GPS hardware and software would do when limited by a tiny watch antenna.
Well…Apple's Series 2 passed with flying colors:
![]()
And the battery life was pretty good. After a few hours of minimal use the watch was at 96% before the run. After an hour of music and GPS, more than 6 miles total, the watch was at 72%. It's still at 64% at 2:31 PM as I type this, definitely better than my originalWatch.
I thought it might be that, but wanted to know for sure.[/QUOT
I did my first GPS test of theWatch Series 2 this morning, and it passed with flying colors. I ran for about an hour with just my watch and wireless headphones. (I left my iPhone 6 in the car in Airplane mode.) The key part of the run was a rugged single-track trail through the forest with switchbacks and heavy tree cover. The loop section I measured separately with the watch is exactly 5 miles. It is used for a local trail race, and I have run it hundreds of times. It is always challenging for GPS devices, especially when the leaves are on the trees. It goes up and down hills and in and out of valleys and it gives GPS devices fits. My trusty Garmin Forerunner 620xt does the best of any device I've ever owned. It usually measures 5 miles or very close (4.95-5.00). I briefly owned a Garmin Fenix 3 when they came out, and it struggled so much on this trail that I swapped it out for a replacement and then returned it. On one run of this course, it measured 4.35 miles. My older Garmins usually came in at 4.85-4.95. My iPhone 6 does well, but I thought that might be the product of having a larger antenna. I was curious to see how Apple's GPS hardware and software would do when limited by a tiny watch antenna.
Well…Apple's Series 2 passed with flying colors:
![]()
And the battery life was pretty good. After a few hours of minimal use the watch was at 96% before the run. After an hour of music and GPS, more than 6 miles total, the watch was at 72%. It's still at 64% at 2:31 PM as I type this, definitely better than my originalWatch.
Great job on the run! Are you planning to stick with the 620 for most of your running, or migrate to the AW. I primarily run with a 735XT now (and previously a 235 and 620) but think the Series 2 may work for me for non-speed training runs.And the battery life was pretty good. After a few hours of minimal use the watch was at 96% before the run. After an hour of music and GPS, more than 6 miles total, the watch was at 72%. It's still at 64% at 2:31 PM as I type this, definitely better than my originalWatch.
I used the default Workout/Exercice app on the watch. Afterwards, you can use the Activity/Activité app on the phone to see the details. Below the big colorful wheel and the middle section showing your daily progress, you'll have each individual workout listed below. Each run, walk, bike, swim, etc. will have a line. Tap on the line and it will bring up details: time of day, calories burned, distance, total time, heart rate, average pace, weather, and--in the lower left corner--a map icon. Tapping on the map icon will bring up the map page I posted above.Wow that's amazing. I can't wait to get it on Tuesday! What is the app you have displayed to track your run?
I got the models confused, I have a 910xt, an older triathlon-centric model, not the newer 620 or the new "smart" triathlon 920xt model.Great job on the run! Are you panning to stick with the 620 for most of your running, or migrate to the AW. I primarily run with a 735XT now (and previously a 235 and 620) but think the Series 2 may work for me for non-speed training runs.
What type of Watch might I ask?I had an original ship date of 9/30 and I just got a shipping notice!
[doublepost=1474154800][/doublepost]Really glad to hear the GPS worked so well, that's why I finally went for the watch, hoping to be able to run without my phone and keep accurate account of distances!I did my first GPS test of theWatch Series 2 this morning, and it passed with flying colors. I ran for about an hour with just my watch and wireless headphones. (I left my iPhone 6 in the car in Airplane mode.) The key part of the run was a rugged single-track trail through the forest with switchbacks and heavy tree cover. The loop section I measured separately with the watch is exactly 5 miles. It is used for a local trail race, and I have run it hundreds of times. It is always challenging for GPS devices, especially when the leaves are on the trees. It goes up and down hills and in and out of valleys and it gives GPS devices fits. My trusty Garmin Forerunner 620xt does the best of any device I've ever owned. It usually measures 5 miles or very close (4.95-5.00). I briefly owned a Garmin Fenix 3 when they came out, and it struggled so much on this trail that I swapped it out for a replacement and then returned it. On one run of this course, it measured 4.35 miles. My older Garmins usually came in at 4.85-4.95. My iPhone 6 does well, but I thought that might be the product of having a larger antenna. I was curious to see how Apple's GPS hardware and software would do when limited by a tiny watch antenna.
Well…Apple's Series 2 passed with flying colors:
![]()
And the battery life was pretty good. After a few hours of minimal use the watch was at 96% before the run. After an hour of music and GPS, more than 6 miles total, the watch was at 72%. It's still at 64% at 2:31 PM as I type this, definitely better than my originalWatch.
View attachment 653756 UPS tracking for Watch stuck at departure from Suzhou, CN. Is that normal?
Looks like mine left Suzhou the same time as yours. I noticed an arrival scan in Shanghai earlier today. Got there at 12:10 am but no further tracking since.
Looks like mine left Suzhou the same time as yours. I noticed an arrival scan in Shanghai earlier today. Got there at 12:10 am but no further tracking since.
There are a bunch of our watches in the second wave on that same flight.
Ditto. I wouldnt sweat it. Looks like they only update it once per day.
I think you're right. They left Suzhou at 11:55pm and got to Shanghai 15 minutes later. I saw the Suzhou departure yesterday afternoon but nothing about Shanghai until this afternoon. All that movement also took place around noon EDT Friday (Shanghai is 12 hours ahead of EDT). I bet there is a lot more progress that we haven't seen yet.
My tracking also says the same, left Suzhou @ 11:55, but that's the last update
Yeah Im seeing the same thing
Last update I have is 12:10 am arrival in Shanghai CN