Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Watch Series 2 Reviews: 'The First Real Apple Watch' Thanks to Fitness and Processor Upgrades
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Not owning an iPhone reduced my interest in the AW; But Series 2 looks very interesting to me.
Question to those of you who own one (Series 1 or 2): How "standalone" is the AW then? Still not standalone at all or does the GPS render it more useful to not-iPhone-users?
Question to those of you who own one (Series 1 or 2): How "standalone" is the AW then? Still not standalone at all or does the GPS render it more useful to not-iPhone-users?
Me too, when I go outside, i keep my phone with me, I don't need GPS on the watch.
I'm not a runner but this guy is, he tested the Garmin, Tom Tom, and AW2 on a 22 mile outdoor run and seemed impressed that they were all fairly close to one another in terms of distance.
Hiking, you fall, smash your phone... but you can find your way out because your watch is fine and has its own GPS!!
Just kidding... personally couldn't care less about the GPS.
I thought the Watch was stupid even after owning it for 8 months. Then I started to use the watch for fitness, and now I am a huge fan. I am upgrading to series 2.
The apple watch is also not bad for the price of a water proof GPS enabled watch with a heart rate monitor (which I saw some complaints about but in all the tests I have read is very good), a touch sensitive screen, haptics, and can get notifications, send messages, talks to a phone, is a bluetooth ipod, etc. Not a bad price.
The apple watch is also not bad for the price of a water proof GPS enabled watch with a heart rate monitor (which I saw some complaints about but in all the tests I have read is very good), a touch sensitive screen, haptics, and can get notifications, send messages, talks to a phone, is a bluetooth ipod, etc. Not a bad price.
Last edited:
They didn't get rid of the sport branding (per se)...they switched it to Nike. If you want to sell the Nike watch, you need to make it seem like that's the big, serious and only real "sports watch." So you remove the "sports" branding from the others so that the super sports minded don't think they can buy the usual watch...they think they need to buy Nike.
AND you also get everyone else thinking: "Which kind of casing/color do I want" not "Is the sports watch for all or just sports people?" Win-win.
And I don't think they're turning it into a fitness device. I think they're trying to make it more fitness device friendly so the they can steal away a share of that market. If it was a fitness device, it wouldn't need to make phone calls if youre marathon training i'd consider going with a garmin
much more reliable with battery life and other metrics.
[doublepost=1473870374][/doublepost]
it's not great on running intervals.
basically if you arent an athlete go for it - but if you are serious at running look elsewhere
much more reliable with battery life and other metrics.
[doublepost=1473870374][/doublepost]
it's not great on running intervals.
basically if you arent an athlete go for it - but if you are serious at running look elsewhere
I really dislike Lauren Goode's Verge video reviews. I know she is trying to put across some personality so to appear different and unique but I find her humour really unfunny and annoying. Nothing against her as a journalist perhaps if I read her rather than watched her I would find her more palatable.
Well, that's an interesting question. The watch now allows you to push the lower button and bring up a 911 call for help. There are devices that use GPS to send out such "Help!" signals. Can the AW2 911 do that using GPS? If it can, then problem solved...does any review or Apple site say if it can do this?
Last edited:
I just upgraded to the watchOS 3, and by Gods it feels so much better with the performance!
I'm certain the newer ones with even faster processors will be even better, but I'm just happy that the update didn't cripple the original gen but improved it further.
Although am yet to see the effect on the battery life.
I'm certain the newer ones with even faster processors will be even better, but I'm just happy that the update didn't cripple the original gen but improved it further.
Although am yet to see the effect on the battery life.
Only a runner understands the advantages of a GPS watch untethered from phone. Do you run?
I always have my phone on me and I go running.... I don't see the problem, just buy clothes that fit nicely and your phone is secure and isn't an issue.
Though I do swim, I still wouldn't swim with this new watch on, I just don't trust it enough.
I wont upgrade though as it doesn't look different, so there is no point, just like how I wont upgrade my iPhone 6s, I want the new phone to have a different build.
Though I do swim, I still wouldn't swim with this new watch on, I just don't trust it enough.
I wont upgrade though as it doesn't look different, so there is no point, just like how I wont upgrade my iPhone 6s, I want the new phone to have a different build.
I kinda like it, it's sort of dry; not trying too hard. Reminds me of NY humor in general.
Thanks for sharing.
[doublepost=1473871723][/doublepost]
if you were an athlete you'd care.
imagine running intervals - all out then stopping - repeat - etc.
you dont want to have a phone with you lol
how about swimming freestroke in the lake? still want your iphone with you? lol
Well, no. Serious athletes will not consider this. Nor will those who just want a watch for fitness and nothing else (why spend the money when they can get something cheaper to measure their daily runs?). But though Apple is selling it like it's a pro-athlete watch, you can't view it through that narrow a lens. It'd be like saying "No serious athlete would wear those super cool tennis shoes that every kid now wants...." even though the commercial shows all these professional athletes wearing it.
The population of serious athletes is pretty small. But the population of people who want to be more athletic is large.
The Apple Watch, thus, gets a bigger share of the sports band market by marketing itself as a way to become more like those athletes. It gets those who think "with this I'll run farther, swim more laps..." to buy it, and it gets those who exercise regularly but not on a "serious athlete" level (run a certain number of miles, or hike on weekends, or swim laps daily...) to buy it. As they say, "Okay, now it can do as much as I need it to do...and it also has those other features I want..." If it was going to be for serious athletes, then it would have to remove a lot of the other features so that its battery would last as long as the "serious athlete" bands (at least 4 days). But Apple doesn't want to sell this watch *just* to athletes. Just like those companies selling hot new tennis shoes don't want to sell them to just to marathon runners or pro basket ball players. So, the watch does other things that those who are not serious athletes want and need it to do. Win-win for Apple. It sells to those who want more from it as a sports watch, but keeps those who want it for other things.
Apple actually succeeded as pushing it as a high fashion accessory. If you put it in the right band on it you can wear it in a formal setting. Many women buy it because of the band selection and colors. What they are doing now is catering to specific uses and getting better at fitness to broaden its appeal to others.
Last edited:
Well, no. Serious athletes will not consider this. Nor will those who just want a watch for fitness and nothing else (why spend the money when they can get something cheaper to measure their daily runs?). But though Apple is selling it like it's a pro-athlete watch, you can't view it through that narrow a lens. It'd be like saying "No serious athlete would wear those super cool tennis shoes that every kid now wants...." even though the commercial shows all these professional athletes wearing it.
The population of serious athletes is pretty small. But the population of people who want to be more athletic is large.
If it was going to be for serious athletes, then it would have to remove a lot of the other features so that its battery would last as long as the "serious athlete" bands (at least 4 days). But Apple doesn't want to sell this watch *just* to athletes. Just like those companies selling hot new tennis shoes don't want to sell them to just to marathon runners or pro basket ball players. So, the watch does other things that those who are not serious athletes want and need it to do. Win-win for Apple. It sells to those who want more from it as a sports watch, but keeps those who want it for other things.
yes - this watch is certainly good for the pseudo user who wants to work out but not super serious.
it's certainly not going to hurt sales to have these new functions but give people who were looking to splurge on competitive devices like the fitbit or the garmin into the apple ecosystem.
Absolutely agree - market it like it's a serious fitness watch it will sell.
While i doubt i'll see one at a triathlon race anytime soon i'll be certain to see the apple 2 watches out on my runs.
I want to see a comparison between a Series 0 running watchOS 3 and a Series 1/2. Has anyone seen any reviews like this? My guess is they won't be around until after release because all those that got "early-bird" access to the device are trying to sell it for Apple and not actually conducting non-biased reviews.
You need an iPhone to use it, period. Right out of the box, you have to pair the watch to an iPhone to "wake it up." You need the phone to upgrade software onto the watch and put apps on the watch, or to download a playlist of music onto the watch. Also to enter your credit card info for Apple Pay.
So, while the AW2 will be able to chart your calories and such on a run or hike, walk or swim, tell you where you are, give you music to listen to, and let you pay for a drink (if the place takes Apple Pay) without the iPhone...it's not iPhone free by any stretch. Remember, this watch is also about being able to get messages on your wrist, phone calls if you want, mail, reminders, etc. All that requires that it be paired with an iPhone.
So. It's kinda chained to the iPhone for now and probably will be for a few more incarnations.
Last edited:
Don't know much about anywhere else in the world, but apples have traditionally been one of the costliest mainstream fruits available for purchase in India, if not the most costly.