Blood pressure is impossible without applying pressure. Thats never going to happen. O2 saturation could happen and the sensors are there but Apple was apparently unable to get it reliable enough. Glucose - no one can do that without blood currently. But people are working on it.So I want blood pressure and glucose monitoring to consider upgrading to the new version. I have version one and love it. But can't justify an updated version with only small iterations.
With all due respect, comparing an Apple Watch to a fitbit is like comparing a pineapple to a giraffe.
This is the only device from Apple that I'd buy this year. None of the others interest me at all. It pains me to upgrade my watch as fast as these keep coming because the resale market on these are terrible... but I do enjoy the apple watch and making apps for it is pretty easy. I'm one that doesn't need the cellular connection, plus having to pay another fee for that monthly would kill any idea of me even wanting that feature.
Baloney. I have a series 0 Watch and the battery lasts thirty six hours easy with moderate use. I put it on its charger at night before retiring. What's the problem with battery life?
So it's going to be a 12 month cycle? Honestly I think something like the Watch could be updated every 18-24 months.
See, I'm the exact opposite. I have the original series Apple watch, and I love it, but I feel zero need to upgrade it at this point.
I don't get the cellular connectivity. I am rarely without my phone, but more importantly, let's say that the cost of an additional device on a cell plan, after taxes and fees is around $50 per month. That is $600 a year. Sorry, but that's a lot of money to make and receive phone calls on my watch, send and receive messages and listen to music. Especially when it is just for times when I don't have my phone within range of the watch.
Maybe people are more wealth than me, but I just don't get it.
This is so true. One of my friends have a Gear S3 Classic and that smartwatch is huge compared to the Apple Watch. It’s the definition of chunky and fat.My wife and I both bought the stainless series 2. We both love the watch and the fact that it isn't round is part of what sets it off from other watches. I hope they maintain the current design and doubt they will change it much if or when they do because there will be too many people pissed off with bands that don't work with a round watch.
As far as the people who say its too fat, chunky, etc, etc. Every time I read one of those comments it tells me right away that it's from someone who doesn't own an Apple Watch. When it's on your wrist it is less chunky than many modern, conventional watches that are sold today.
I have a 42mm and actually wish they made a third, larger version.
Always on screen..... why?
Ah yes, forgot about Homepod.. well ok so there's maybe a second device I'll purchase this year from Apple.See, I'm the exact opposite. I have the original series Apple watch, and I love it, but I feel zero need to upgrade it at this point. Besides maybe wishing the original were advertised as waterproof, there's really nothing else the new ones do that i need. But I'm definitely interested in the next iPhone, and maybe even the Homepod once i get to hear it. The Watch is the rare instance where I think they nailed it out of the gate, and all the rest are incremental improvements. If they release one with cellular that can use your existing account, or maybe some kind of facetime camera, that would be intriguing enough, but for now I think it suits my needs just fine.
Won't have a redesign. Would upset the band collectors to much.
May I ask why?Needing an always-on screen to consider this upgrade.
Apple is now firmly back to iPod-style domination for the wearables market.
No competitor has the money and/or the incentive (as they already lost tons of money on their failed wearables efforts) to research&develop the futuristic tech Apple is expected to deliver in the next years.
This is Apple's game to play, and win, for the foreseeable future.
Baloney. I have a series 0 Watch and the battery lasts thirty six hours easy with moderate use. I put it on its charger at night before retiring. What's the problem with battery life?
Yeah, they definitely need to support the software on Apple Watch longer than they do on iOS, because these are watches. People don't upgrade them frequently. That being said, Apple does provide pretty good support on iOS compared to most companies. I just hope that something like a watch will have a longer lifecycle, even if only on a basic level so that in the far future you could wear an original Series 0 to a fancy dinner and it would at least function as a watch without needing to be paired or activated. It irritates me that I can't hook up my original iPhone to the cellular network, despite it still being a device capable of connecting, simply because Apple took down the activation for it.I'm fine with them releasing an updated AW every year as long as they keep supporting old models.
I own a series 1 and I'm really satisfied, I don't think I need cellular connectivity so I wonder what can Apple put in a future version to entice me to upgrade.
I think they'll introduce some kind of smart bands, to provide even more features concerning health. And the Watch is also a fashion item, like watches has always been, so a redesign will always help sales.