Bell’s $5 plan sold me on the AppleWatch LTE. $10 is too much for an occasional use of cellular. $5 is just right.
But it got me thinking. What if I used my Watch for more than just occasional use and more like my main personal computer? Before the keynote, I was planning on buying a new iPhone and maybe upgrading my Watch.
But now I’m thinking about not owning an iPhone at all. In this scenario, my Apple Watch and AirPods would be the computer that I always have with me. I’d use it for messages, phone calls, music and would ask Siri questions for what ever else I search on my iPhone for today.
For actual work, I have an iPad Pro that I often carry with me as a binder under my arm. For photography, I already carry my Sony a9 with me.
You can't. The Apple Watch has a special embedded SIM which can't be removed.
But tracking runs/rides without a phone is a series 2 feature: GPS. The $10/month isn't adding that functionality. For me, it's just adding the ability to make a call in an emergency, and that's not a reasonable cost for that function.People already pay gym memberships and for health tracking apps. $10/month to be able to track your runs/rides without the need to bring your phone seems well worth it, in addition to being able to make a call should there be an emergency.
right so how do you switch carriers? if you can switch carriers, wonder if you can reassign the sim that contains the 250mb of data
i remember losing that sim and they gave me a new sim card that has the same 250mb of free data. so it's entirely possible to assign a particular plan to the esim in the watch assuming you can switch carriers.
This isn't true. At least for VZW. All smart watches going forward will be $10/month.Well I guess that makes the LTE Apple Watch a no go for me. I was really excited about it - I would love to be able to leave my iPhone at home in certain circumstances, but $10 a month for service is just absurd. I was really hoping that at least T-Mobile would undercut the other telecoms as they typically do, I could definitely handle $5/month. The worst part is, other LTE watches out there are only $5/month. I guess the carriers think, because it's an Apple device, they can charge more for the same service and people won't care. Hopefully they're wrong, and the pricing will drop soon.
But tracking runs/rides without a phone is a series 2 feature: GPS. The $10/month isn't adding that functionality. For me, it's just adding the ability to make a call in an emergency, and that's not a reasonable cost for that function.
And this is why they don't care the lower the cost. If you're willing to pay, then don't complain. You're the reason it's $10 instead of $5. They won't take less money out of the goodness of their heart if they don't have toI'll pay the fees
That's ridiculous. Without LTE, it's $330, (even cheaper for a discounted series 2, which is nearly the same thing minus the LTE). So after one year of ownership, the cost for an LTE model is $520 vs $330 for non-LTE. Over 50% more expensive. It's totally reasonable that someone would view a 50% price hike for LTE as over the top.If $120 a year is causing you consternation, you probably shouldn't be an Apple Watch owner to begin with.
I'm not disputing that it's up to the buyer, or that it could be seen as worth it. I was simply saying that what you're paying for is that emergency call, not for the tracking.It's all up to the buyer. My wife would gladly pay $10 month for the peace of mind knowing she can call in an emergency while out running.
I'm sure everyone that has an emergency situation would trade the cost for the ability to get help when it's needed.
That's ridiculous. Without LTE, it's $330, (even cheaper for a discounted series 2, which is nearly the same thing minus the LTE). So after one year of ownership, the cost for an LTE model is $520 vs $330 for non-LTE. Over 50% more expensive. It's totally reasonable that someone would view a 50% price hike for LTE as over the top.
But tracking runs/rides without a phone is a series 2 feature: GPS. The $10/month isn't adding that functionality. For me, it's just adding the ability to make a call in an emergency, and that's not a reasonable cost for that function.