Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Does any know if it is possible to turn off the always-on-display?
Buy a S4? You could probably get one cheaper when some store wants to get rid of their on hands. Unless you absolutely need the compass feature.
[doublepost=1568156051][/doublepost]
The Apple Watch pictured on one of the images got this after 2 years of use without an always on display.
Series 0 or 1?
 
Seems to be 0.
So about four years it has burn in. I wonder how much this has to do with its age or older display design. I guess if you plan on keeping it for years this might be an issue but personally I couldn't imagine keeping my AW more than two years.
 
It’s disappointing that, according the  website, the Titanium weighs exactly the same as Steel.

I've got a Series 3 LTE. I've been waiting for a Watch that I won't have to upgrade for several years before getting a better material than the Sport aluminum.

I think that the Apple Watch is there. The Series 4 was already more than powerful enough, with the right screen size and the right battery. The Series 5 is even more powerful, now has an always on display with that same large screen and comfortable all day battery life.

I'm looking forward to picking up a titanium Apple Watch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: russell_314
Ordered one as soon as the keynote ended.

yeehaw.
[doublepost=1568159782][/doublepost]
why is everyone complaining about the AOD when almost every comment on apple watch threads for the past year have been people moaning for it

it was either a new awesome feature like this or no AW S5 at all...if you have an AWS4 you are more than fine
Most people are here just to bitch about EVERYTHING.
 
Don’t laugh, I’m still sporting my Series 0  Watch. It barely works for anything other than telling time.

I was all set to upgrade last year, until I ended up buying a new home, and decided the watch money could be better spent on something like a washer & dryer.

AW5 is a no-brainer for me this year. Visually it is stunning. On the outside, it doesn’t even look like the same watch from 5 years ago, not to mention what’s on the inside.

And that ceramic. WOW. I was hoping pricing would fall around where the titanium did. So it’s stainless again for me. I do wish Apple would do another stainless band. The (retired) link was too bulky for my wrist, and the Milanese Loop, is too feminine looking (IMO).
 
My AW4 is giving me grief (active minutes not measuring right), but I suspect its software related. It just ends up making me exercise that much longer.

I'm ok with the price of the AW5, the trade in values are offensive though. Last year, the AW3 was $250 trade in value for SS. This year, the maximum trade in is $120. That is beyond ridiculous. I will wait to see it in store and decide then.
 
Is it really... screen comes on anyways when you turn your wrist. This is just a battery killer....
Perhaps watch the keynote where they go into great detail why your wrong.
[doublepost=1568161186][/doublepost]
I’m surprised by all the S3 people saying it’s a worthy upgrade for them.
Seriously, I still daily wear my S0, the original, and whilst the AOD on this is tempting and I’d love one, the cheapest large size is £429. Is it really going to be £429 better than my perfectly functioning S0? No. No it obviously isn’t, it’s still basically the same thing. do I want. it, hell yes, but to claim it’s a big upgrade from an S3 is mad, it’s not from my S0.
Lol saying it’s not a big upgrade from an s0
 
  • Like
Reactions: chabig
In simple words:
S4 owners, look elsewhere. Nothing to see this year. Your watch still works perfectly fine.
S3 or older owners, maybe a good investment depending on how good is your watch's battery now. If it is still doing fine, read above.
 
I feel this “always on” feature can be done in a simple software upgrade and be available to all watch models. Of course more battery usage but then I don’t think series 4 and series 3 are too old to not have this feature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: calstanford
My AW4 is giving me grief (active minutes not measuring right), but I suspect its software related. It just ends up making me exercise that much longer.

I'm ok with the price of the AW5, the trade in values are offensive though. Last year, the AW3 was $250 trade in value for SS. This year, the maximum trade in is $120. That is beyond ridiculous. I will wait to see it in store and decide then.

I don’t think you are alone. I have S3 and my wife has S4 and despite doing the same walk at the same cadence, she has to work about 40% more to get the same credit. Something amiss either in mine or hers.
 
In simple words:
S4 owners, look elsewhere. Nothing to see this year. Your watch still works perfectly fine.
S3 or older owners, maybe a good investment depending on how good is your watch's battery now. If it is still doing fine, read above.

This I can agree with
 
I see no reason to upgrade from a 3 to this. What's the big deal about the always-on display? Yeah it's nice, I guess, but is it really that difficult to move your wrist to make the screen come on? This is the amazing innovation from Apple now? Geesh.

Plus, what about if I don't want info popping up for everyone to see, if my wrist/arm is pointed away from my face but toward people sitting next to me, in a meeting, etc.? So now we have to turn alerts off or will it not show until you.. move your wrist? :confused:
That's why Theater mode was created.
you could download the Apple eBook for it and find out more about it (it should be on the iBooks Store for free)
 
Do we really think they couldn't have brought the AOD to the S4 last year?

This feels purposely held back just to have "something" for this year.

It could have an AOD but without LTPO OLED you’d just waste that battery life for such a little, meaningless improvement. Not to mention the potential burn in for AOD on a regular OLED.

Dynamic refresh rate is the key here, and AWS4 didn’t have that.
 
It could have an AOD but without LTPO OLED you’d just waste that battery life for such a little, meaningless improvement. Not to mention the potential burn in for AOD on a regular OLED.

Dynamic refresh rate is the key here, and AWS4 didn’t have that.

That wasn't what I meant.

I think they had the tech and the whole product as something that could have released last year as a "better" S4 than what they released and they purposely broke it up to make 2 releases out of 1.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.