Thinner please! The current one is ugly on small wrists.
Really hoping for a new re-deign. I really don’t want to get trickled like last year with the S7 model.
100% Agree.If you need to use 3 decimal places, then inches are probably not the right unit of length to be using.
👍Right? Does apple even market the watch sizes in freedom units inside the USA, or do they just use mm like everywhere else?
I’ve got at assume the new size is 50mm, and not the very on-brand 1.99” Apple Watch 🤣
Also, article maths is wrong. 45 => 50 is not “nearly 5% bigger”, it’s 10% bigger, but I guess all those decimal places to try and measure it in furlongs introduced some errors
Rumors are that it’ll have the same chip as the 7, which itself was the same as the 6.Hopefully it looks like those mockups! Those look fantastic. But because of Apple's supply chain issues, it'll probably look like the 7 with a new chip in it lol.
there's an App fo- ...I mean... Watch Face for that. 😎Apple Watch 8: to infinity and beyond!
I’ve been moving my face closer to my watch. D’oh!You can already make the screen bigger... Just move it closer to your face.
A square apple watch does not seem elegant at all. Very soft squared (Filleted) edges on the 8 might be tolerable.... We'll see.... Still not convinced looking at some rounded edge wood and metal cuts that it will be as nice to touch as the current apple watch. The flat sides of the 13 are just not as pleasant to hold as the 6-11 series were.Honestly, that iPhone 12/13 slab design mock-up for the Watch 8 we’ve been predicting for a while now has not grown on me. It just looks like it would be uncomfortable to wear. Not to mention, it wouldn’t age well. Looks like a cheap Chinese knockoff.
My recommendation would be more of the rounded, contour edges of the new MacBook Pro’s and Air. It’s a squared off design yes, but it’s a little softer.
The math is correct, the 45mm actually isn't 45mm diagonally it's 48mm diagonally. So they go from 1.9 inch to 2 inch (roughly) diagonally.Right? Does apple even market the watch sizes in freedom units inside the USA, or do they just use mm like everywhere else?
I’ve got at assume the new size is 50mm, and not the very on-brand 1.99” Apple Watch 🤣
Also, article maths is wrong. 45 => 50 is not “nearly 5% bigger”, it’s 10% bigger, but I guess all those decimal places to try and measure it in furlongs introduced some errors
"Freedom units".... I'm going to have to annoy people at work with that term 🤣Right? Does apple even market the watch sizes in freedom units inside the USA, or do they just use mm like everywhere else?
I’ve got at assume the new size is 50mm, and not the very on-brand 1.99” Apple Watch 🤣
Also, article maths is wrong. 45 => 50 is not “nearly 5% bigger”, it’s 10% bigger, but I guess all those decimal places to try and measure it in furlongs introduced some errors