Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If you need to use 3 decimal places, then inches are probably not the right unit of length to be using.
100% Agree.

I wish MacRumours would stick to Metric in cases like this.

What the heck is 1.901-inches or 0.089-inches? 🤷🏻‍♂️

Right? Does apple even market the watch sizes in freedom units inside the USA, or do they just use mm like everywhere else?

I’ve got at assume the new size is 50mm, and not the very on-brand 1.99” Apple Watch 🤣

Also, article maths is wrong. 45 => 50 is not “nearly 5% bigger”, it’s 10% bigger, but I guess all those decimal places to try and measure it in furlongs introduced some errors
👍
 
I am so bored with my Apple Watch these days that I wear it - at most - once per month. Seems like everyone is wearing the same watch — how incredibly boring that is. And for someone who sees no value in the exercise rings any longer they really annoy me when I do. Why can't we just switch the rings completely off — everywhere?

So, for me, a redesigned Watch would have to be a radical departure from the current design. That will probably not happen.
 
Apple Watch Pro Max 16.

I have it on great authority from my sources at Apple that told me in a dream from Tim Apple. Sorry.

angry_boss_AppleWatchProMax16.jpg
 
I don't get it, honestly. If earlier rumors are true, this is going to be quite a boring refresh. How unfortunate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackBun
You can already make the screen bigger... Just move it closer to your face.
I’ve been moving my face closer to my watch. D’oh!


“A 1.99-inch Apple Watch display size compares to 1.691-inches on the 41mm Apple Watch Series 7 and 1.901-inches on the 45mm Apple Watch Series 7.”

Whats with those weird inch sizes? 45mm is 1.77165 inches, not 1.901.
Are they including the bezel and the curved edge as “the display”?
(Why are we suddenly using inches anyway?)
 
Would be great if it looks like on those mockups but mostly they stick to this silly styles and let others do the cool stuff. 5% larger display? Wow and what can I see there with 5% more display? Sorry but this watch needs much more battery life....
 
Honestly, that iPhone 12/13 slab design mock-up for the Watch 8 we’ve been predicting for a while now has not grown on me. It just looks like it would be uncomfortable to wear. Not to mention, it wouldn’t age well. Looks like a cheap Chinese knockoff.

My recommendation would be more of the rounded, contour edges of the new MacBook Pro’s and Air. It’s a squared off design yes, but it’s a little softer.
A square apple watch does not seem elegant at all. Very soft squared (Filleted) edges on the 8 might be tolerable.... We'll see.... Still not convinced looking at some rounded edge wood and metal cuts that it will be as nice to touch as the current apple watch. The flat sides of the 13 are just not as pleasant to hold as the 6-11 series were.
1656943552790.png
1656943583179.png
1656943358104.png



Polished CHAMFER edges would be real nice on the watch. Get a little *bling, bling* on the watch like the 5s.

1656943846192.png



Square on rugged makes sense, because "who cares?": it's meant to be fugly and tough.
 

Attachments

  • 1656943430734.png
    1656943430734.png
    203.3 KB · Views: 56
  • 1656943783664.png
    1656943783664.png
    686.9 KB · Views: 46
Right? Does apple even market the watch sizes in freedom units inside the USA, or do they just use mm like everywhere else?

I’ve got at assume the new size is 50mm, and not the very on-brand 1.99” Apple Watch 🤣

Also, article maths is wrong. 45 => 50 is not “nearly 5% bigger”, it’s 10% bigger, but I guess all those decimal places to try and measure it in furlongs introduced some errors
The math is correct, the 45mm actually isn't 45mm diagonally it's 48mm diagonally. So they go from 1.9 inch to 2 inch (roughly) diagonally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whathappened
I can't imagine Apple using a watch design only for a single iteration (Series 7). Maybe the rumor is related to the 2023 model.
 
  • Like
Reactions: entropys
I wonder what the trade-off is with a slightly increased screen size and a slightly larger battery due to the larger overall case? Do the added pixels negate any battery size increase? To a point, I’m not sure Apple can do much beyond getting 24-30 hours of battery life out of the larger sized AW, unless they significantly increase the thickness of the Watch.
 
Right? Does apple even market the watch sizes in freedom units inside the USA, or do they just use mm like everywhere else?

I’ve got at assume the new size is 50mm, and not the very on-brand 1.99” Apple Watch 🤣

Also, article maths is wrong. 45 => 50 is not “nearly 5% bigger”, it’s 10% bigger, but I guess all those decimal places to try and measure it in furlongs introduced some errors
"Freedom units".... I'm going to have to annoy people at work with that term 🤣

But actually.... your math is wrong. 50 is 111.11111111111% of 45. (Source: https://www.calculator.net/percent-...r1=50&c22par2=45&ctype=22&x=64&y=20#pctcommon)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.