how did she make the cover, to me, she doesn't look pretty and she looks like a guy
The Apple Watch is expected to launch in early 2015 and the device will be available in a wide range of materials and at several different price points. On the lower end, the Sport version of the device will retail for $349, and rumors have suggested the higher-end solid gold Edition models could sell for thousands of dollars.
Funny , I didn't see any watch in those pictures .
Buy or not buy comes down to...
1. Battery life (1 week at least please)
2. Water resistant or not (ideally I want to surf with it)
3. How often do they plan on refreshing (if annually, count me out)
Buy or not buy comes down to...
1. Battery life (1 week at least please)
2. Water resistant or not (ideally I want to surf with it)
3. How often do they plan on refreshing (if annually, count me out)
This doesn't seem right. The Apple Watch with the stainless steel bezel appears to be the entry-level product. The lighter Apple Watch Sport with the aluminum bezel seems to be set up at midlevel pricing.
I was going to hold back my opinion as it was gonna be offtopic but as you have already started it!
I live in Toronto and honestly I see much prettier looking young asian ladies than the model on this cover. I think she is fine looking but they can find much unique/prettier faces - tallness does not have to be their achilles hill...
This doesn't seem right. The Apple Watch with the stainless steel bezel appears to be the entry-level product. The lighter Apple Watch Sport with the aluminum bezel seems to be set up at midlevel pricing.
This doesn't seem right. The Apple Watch with the stainless steel bezel appears to be the entry-level product. The lighter Apple Watch Sport with the aluminum bezel seems to be set up at midlevel pricing.
You're right that Apple has been putting them in that order on their Web page, but I'm pretty sure it has been confirmed by Apple reps after the keynote that the Sport model is the cheaper one.
Also, the Sports edition only comes in 10 models with only rubber bands, while the "Normal" stainless steel edition comes in 18 models with a variety of bands including metal and leather bands.
Forget the watch even the presentation is terrible. That watch is massive.
Apple has yet another great hit on its hands. And that totally drives the crazies nuts. Even if Samsung could buy this kind of publicity (it can't), it wouldn't know just what to buy. It's got no class, no soul. Apple has earned its success and repute with its stellar production. Can't wait for the 16th.
1) Got to be kiding with current battery and SOC tech, maybe in 10 years.
2) The sport version is already water resistant, but not waterproof (don't dive with it).
3) You don't need to buy one each year even if they refresh it each year.
How in the world would an aluminum watch with rubber band be more expensive than stainless steel? I see it as the stainless steel will be the standard watch (with the most band combinations) along with a cheaper sport version and a more expensive gold version.
Homage