In some cases the siren would be more useful in the crowded, public areas (urban wilderness) than in the (rural) wilderness...
Yea, I'm not trying to piss bears and mountain lions off. 😅
In some cases the siren would be more useful in the crowded, public areas (urban wilderness) than in the (rural) wilderness...
Back to Maths 101...Area is a quadratic function. So the Ultra has 1164 - 1143 = 21 sq mm more area than the 8. Since the aspect ratio is roughly square, that means that the Ultra has roughly sqrt(21) = 4.6 mm more linear space in each direction. That’s more than an eighth of an inch.
Grab your ruler, and you’ll see that that’s a non-trivial length for something to go on your wrist.
Yes, it would be nice were the bezels as thin as on the 8 — whether because the case was smaller or the display area was bigger. I’m sure we’ll see that no later than mid-decade.
But the display itself actually is bigger, plus it’s got a much larger battery, plus it’s got the extra speakers and microphones, plus it’s got … well, an improved but not as much improved as you might have hoped for display seems a reasonable compromise for all the other leaps ahead in the Ultra.
Nobody’s yet commented on the substantial increase of thickness of this watch; that’s likely to be much more annoying day-to-day. But I’m hoping / expecting to be pleasantly surprised … by the numbers, my S4 would seem to be a behemoth, but it actually looks and feels like nothing. I’m guessing that, by the end of the second day of wearing the Ultra, it’ll feel perfectly natural.
b&
[…] to accommodate the most extreme environments […] from –4° F (–20° C) […]
I want this brick of a watch. Exactly what I was looking for since they started making watches.It’s not a bigger screen it’s basically exactly the same look on apples site; it’s just the huge bezel and case make it 49mm but not bigger screen, also all these features like brighter display etc should have been on series 8 most people don’t want this brick of a watch but want the new features
A Rolex, which is only good for time and date, start around $7.000 and still people are buying it (sometimes above retail). It's not only common sense and rational functionality. If you like what you see in the new Ultra, don't cancel.I preordered one, but I may cancel. The screens actually seem to be the same size. The only software features the ultra seems to have is the depth app and a watch face. The button would be useful.
I like to pretend that I would get use out of the ruggedness, but if I'm honest with myself I wont.
Apple had to leave something for Ultra series 2. 😃agreed. Since it has the flat physical bezels, would have been nice if the screen itself went all the way up to the edges. That black border is quite large.
Which normal watch are you referring to?wats extreme tho, the normal watch is strong and durable and you can add an extreme case if you want, so what's so special, this has the louder speakers and brighter display that's not extreme that should have been standard on series 8
Gee I dunno, maybe their designers didn't think bout this at all when they designed it. There has to be no real reason for it at all. 😏![]()
The bezel is way too wide on Ultra. The display area on Ultra, according to Apple specs is 1164 sq mm vs 1143 sq mm on a regular Watch 8: basically the same size just ultra has bigger bezels. Shame
False.It’s same screen size just ultra has bigger bezels
As a dude with a small wrist I'm so bummed about how gigantic this thing is. The features are awesome and I would totally pick one up in a smaller case size but this would look absolutely comical on me
To be fair, in five years the Rolex won’t need to be binned due to Rolex dropping software support.A Rolex, which is only good for time and date, start around $7.000 and still people are buying it (sometimes above retail). It's not only common sense and rational functionality. If you like what you see in the new Ultra, don't cancel.