Oh god, I hadn't thought of that - what if the Photos change is representative of all the upcoming UI changes?! :'(This is why none of the features were ready at launch and why the Sports and Photos app refreshes look so different.
Oh god, I hadn't thought of that - what if the Photos change is representative of all the upcoming UI changes?! :'(This is why none of the features were ready at launch and why the Sports and Photos app refreshes look so different.
You’re missing my point. One version of the amount is relative to what they can deliver. Another version is in absolute in terms of count/value of the features. For the latter, it has really been crap lately. Eg releases featuring wall papers.Yes, that was the point of the OPs comment, they promise too much and fail to deliver. He is saying they should promise less and deliver more...
Yes! As a small startup on the bleeding edge of technology, Apple has to sometimes make the tough decision to pull features at the very last minute because they aren’t quite ready to delight customers. However, there would be no features to pull if Apple didn’t announce them, so they are in a tough spot: either have no new features and those have nothing to delight customers or have new features and run the risk of having to pull them because they aren’t quite ready to delight customers.GOOD! I hope it sticks. under-promise and over-deliver. Surprise and delight. This is the way to succeed.
It could be representitive of the level of UI customisation. Once you dive into the options and turn off the things you don't need I find its more intuitive than the old one. If you need something a little more minimal I'd recommend Photomator as a replacement.Oh god, I hadn't thought of that - what if the Photos change is representative of all the upcoming UI changes?! :'(
Assuming Photomator remains available, which I suspect it won't, long term. Not very Apple to keep two apps in development that aim to solve the same problem.It could be representitive of the level of UI customisation. Once you dive into the options and turn off the things you don't need I find its more intuitive than the old one. If you need something a little more minimal I'd recommend Photomator as a replacement.
I’m just being angry and salty about Siri as per usual so it was just a passive aggressive attack lol. It’s an annoying spot to be so disappointed in a “product” that I still use daily because I’m consumed by the ecosystem. We basically have only gotten moves and sports added to Siri in the past decade. And somehow it gets worse over time. Truly astonishing. Then to think we were FINALLY getting sirAI just to be duped. I’ve reached the point where my new “hey siri” phrase is “Siri ask chatGPT”.Beta tag on Siri was removed with the release of iOS 7. Around two years after its introduction with iPhone 4s.
or very boringShould make WWDC interesting.
but isn't that what they've been trying to doWell this is a good thing. Go back to absolute secrecy.
If you add it to your download list now it will stay there, even if they remove it from purchase.Assuming Photomator remains available, which I suspect it won't, long term. Not very Apple to keep two apps in development that aim to solve the same problem.
New company directive:
Don't announce products that don't exist and that we don't know how to build ✅
Should make WWDC interesting.
And as a consumer, i'll be far more cautious about believing anything Apple tell me, in a keynote again.
Oh it's already on my phone! Lack of long term support could still be a problem though, breaking when new iOS versions come out, not integrating with new features, etc.If you add it to your download list now it will stay there, even if they remove it from purchase.
What people also have an issue with (too much, in my opinion) is either hearing about a product that they think is coming and agonizing over their "do I buy now or wait for forthcoming X" decision, which we see all the time in the forums, or being upset that Apple might have some update to a product, and that it somehow makes their current version of a product less valuable.Nobody is saying that apple can’t announce things like for example at wwdc
However what people have an issue with is making announcements when the product or software isn’t actually working in a decent capacity
Have you read about the behind the scenes of the original iphone announcement Jobs gave at MacWorld in 2007? The software on the phone only worked if he demonstrated features in a very specific, very scripted order, any wrong input and the whole phone could crash. Luckily things went off without a hitch. It certainly would have been embarrassing if something had gone wrong during the live show or if apple had to postpone the actual release of the phone because it wasn't ready on time. Good Times indeed...Apple should go back to live on stage demonstrations like they did back when Steve Jobs was alive and demo item or feature in person! I miss those days, and that’s how you knew the product was real and working and functional by them, showing it to you in person not some pre-recorded pre-edited video that they have just gotten lazy doing ever since Covid
They are being forced to announce things like this and products like that because the tech industry is doing things & producing thatWhat people also have an issue with (too much, in my opinion) is either hearing about a product that they think is coming and agonizing over their "do I buy now or wait for forthcoming X" decision, which we see all the time in the forums, or being upset that Apple might have some update to a product, and that it somehow makes their current version of a product less valuable.
I see both sentiments here all the time, and I have a feeling that those people will be even more upset when they don't have information from Apple.
For the record, I think it's in Apple's best interests to under-promise and over-deliver. The Apple Intelligence ads and announcements debacle has harmed the brand, and revealed that the senior executive level is a mess. They need to get their house in order (which of course, they know by now). So I'm all for having their announcements aligned with reality. I'm just saying there is a segment of the MR commentariat that is going to lose its collective mind when they have less insight into Apple's plans, and we'll read alllll about their frustrations here. :insert hundreds of crying emojis:
Have you read about the behind the scenes of the original iphone announcement Jobs gave at MacWorld in 2007? The software on the phone only worked if he demonstrated features in a very specific, very scripted order, any wrong input and the whole phone could crash.
This is not 2007 anymore they can’t get away with announcing or launching software that isn’t ready the landscape has changedThe problem is that AI development is a completely different beast to regular software development. The iPhone was based on a mature existing OS (OS X), and although I’m sure they were keen to get it to market, they weren’t under any particular time pressure. The UI may have been a bit fragile at the WWDC demo, but they could be confident a few late nights and weekends would sort it before release. The original iPhone was also very much a v1.0 release, aimed at early adopters. But that was OK, as there was already enough there to get everyone interested.
The AI demo is September 2024 was more like the Mac Pro pre-announcement in April 2017, after Apple suddenly accepted they needed to build the 7,1. They acted like it was already well into development and customers just needed to hold on for its release, when in reality they’d just started work and it would take years. Unfortunately, in this case the iPhone is their flagship product, and AI is burning hot right now (granted, much is hype, but still).