Apple Withholds Republican Convention Donations Over Trump Politics

[Bobby Corwen]

By whom? The Bureau of Justice is refuting your evidence.

According to your macro, 320,000 whites suffered at the hands of black people. According to the BJS report, the number of violent crimes committed by blacks for the years between 2005-2014 tends to float around an average of 450,000 reported cases. If we assume your report is correct, which we have no reason to other than it's own word, than it looks like the VAST majority of black violence is committed against whites.

But if we go by this, then it looks like 90% of black crime tends to be committed against other black people. It's the same for whites. Violent crimes, such as rapes, assaults, murder, tend to be surprisingly intraracial.

So you're wrong.

Again still has nothing to do with the info graphic I posted.

its a commonly posted pic from all over the internet that everyone has seen and is from legit sources.

Heres a link to something that says the same stuff http://www.infowars.com/black-crime-facts-that-the-white-liberal-media-darent-talk-about/

There are such statistics all over the place.

 

[ardent73]

It should be illegal for Apple to donate money to any political party. Same goes for any business. They are not citizens. They have no right to buy political power.

"No Taxation Without Representation." A corporation is a taxpayer even if not a citizen.

 

[Bobby Corwen]

dem·a·gogue
[ˈdeməˌɡäɡ]

a political leader who seeks support by appealing to popular desires and prejudices rather than by using rational argument.

How does Trump not have rational arguments? Lmao. You people have so little intellectual honesty its ridiculous.

The very basis for why he causes so much drama is because he goes around triggering PC liberals by telling the truth and people saying he's not allowed to say this or that. Then other people realizing all he did was say something rational in a no non-sense way.

 

[Bubba Satori]

I'm shocked. Captain Renault, Casablanca.

 

[Bobby Corwen]

You keep saying half the country...... Where are you getting these numbers?

According to Apple they don't want the business of all the red states.

 

[ardent73]

[doublepost=1466299520][/doublepost]
I berate 2A supporters on the grounds that they actually think they stand any chance if the US military decided to act against them. You would be like a tiny gnat, swatted out of existence with the least bit of effort. All we can really hope to do is keep such monsters out of the government.

Apparently you missed the American Revolution in the 1770's...

 

[thekev]

By whom? The Bureau of Justice is refuting your evidence.

According to your macro, 320,000 whites suffered at the hands of black people. According to the BJS report, the number of violent crimes committed by blacks for the years between 2005-2014 tends to float around an average of 450,000 reported cases. If we assume your report is correct, which we have no reason to other than it's own word, than it looks like the VAST majority of black violence is committed against whites.

But if we go by this, then it looks like 90% of black crime tends to be committed against other black people. It's the same for whites. Violent crimes, such as rapes, assaults, murder, tend to be surprisingly intraracial.

So you're wrong.

I wouldn't bother arguing. He clearly ascribes achievements to people of a race rather than the individuals who are actively involved. He makes the same mistake with his example of Jewish business owners who disliked their customers. He attributes actions to races rather than people. Perhaps one day Mr. Corwen will lock himself in a homemade Faraday cage to escape the grasp of the evil liberals.

dem·a·gogue
[ˈdeməˌɡäɡ]

a political leader who seeks support by appealing to popular desires and prejudices rather than by using rational argument.

rabble-rouser * agitator * political agitator



Trump is practically the textbook example of a demagogue.

Trump's comment should have backfired when he went up against that judge. He complained about drug dealers and suggested the judge is Mexican (whether he actually meant Hispanic or a Mexican national is unimportant). The irony is that the judge spent some of his earlier career prosecuting drug traffickers.

 

[phrehdd]

Nothing Apple does surprises me (anymore).

Apple deals with the ugliest of nations when it comes to manufacturing and the worker.
Apple abandons users of certain hardware and software.
Apple talks the talk but really doesn't walk the walk of green.
and the list goes on.

If they want to play politics they might as well. I would have to snicker if the GOP nominee wins and bans Apple products from gov't and agencies. Then again, maybe a tariff on Chinese manufactured goods will make Apple think twice in the future on being so daft. A smart company would stay as neutral as possible given this particular election where we get a choice between an unknown (politically) with an unfiltered mouth with business bully tactics and the counter part being a liar, cheat and hypocrite.

 

[Renzatic]

Again still has nothing to do with the info graphic I posted.

its a commonly posted pic from all over the internet that everyone has seen and is from legit sources.

Heres a link to something that says the same stuff http://www.infowars.com/black-crime-facts-that-the-white-liberal-media-darent-talk-about/

There are such statistics all over the place.

Oh, a commonly posted pic on the internet. Yeah, guess I can't argue against the unyielding logic of crap that gets posted on Facebook. It's gospel.

Listen, your little stupid picture cited the BJS as it's source. I provided actual links to that source that not only dispute it's claims, but outright deny them. You are wrong. Making up lame excuses like "oh, well my friends see that picture all the time" won't make you any more right.

 

[Bobby Corwen]

Jewish business owners who disliked their customers.

Lmao, thats definitely not how I would describe them.

You have a funny choice of words mister.

Political correctness = intellectual dishonesty.

 

[Renzatic]

I wouldn't bother arguing. He clearly ascribes achievements to people of a race rather than the individuals who are actively involved. He makes the same mistake with his example of Jewish business owners who disliked their customers. He attributes actions to races rather than people.

You're right, of course. But I'm not arguing here to change his mind. I'll never dispel him of his comfortable notions.

But I can make him look wrong. And that's fun in its own special way.

 

[APlotdevice]

Apparently you missed the American Revolution in the 1770's...

Apparently you missed the countless advances in military technology that have been made since then...

I mean seriously, what are you going to do against a cruise missile? Or even a mortar shell?

While you're waiting to see the whites of their eye, they can target you from the other side of the country.

 

[Bobby Corwen]

Oh, a commonly posted pic on the internet. Yeah, guess I can't argue against the unyielding logic of crap that gets posted on Facebook. It's gospel.

Listen, your little stupid picture cited the BJS as it's source. I provided actual links to that source that not only dispute it's claims, but outright deny them. You are wrong. Making up lame excuses like "oh, well my friends see that picture all the time" won't make you any more right.

The picture, the stats, and reality itself is true. I grew up in Oakland in the 90s.

Weather you choose to believe it or not.

A lot of this stuff, people like you choose to act like it doesnt exist, they deny it because it makes them uncomfortable and collapses their reality. They will be forced to do something, and that is also uncomfortable.

Unlike you, Trump is not afraid.

Now get out of our way liberal cucks! You have embarrassed yourselves (and this country) enough with your mental illnesses!

[doublepost=1466400481][/doublepost]This video was going viral in Europe for awhile when it came out.

The idea behind it is actually scientifically proven to be genetic. In other words, there is a "beta" gene that is helpful for survival.

For example if a rabbit is feeding in a spot, and a rival feeder comes into that territory, unlike a lion, a rabbit will simply, yield, and move along to another bush.

So this beta (bend over backwards) element is present in many liberal cucks who have these types of self hating attitudes.

In fact the are afraid, its a reaction fear. But they don't realize the way they act is actually a mental disability.

Its the opposite of logic, or strength, and would lead to our destruction if these people fully came to power. To think these people, liberals with beta genes with no backbone, want to rule our country and have the power to lead is ridiculous.

For some European nations its already too late.

That is what happens when PC illusions clash with hardcore cause and effect reality of logistics.

That video is profound because that mental illness that is genetic is present even as he says "you knew exactly what i was before you let me in"

In a way liberals are trying to lead us into a mass political suicide because of their emo and mentally ill world views.

 

[thekev]

Lmao, thats definitely not how I would describe them.

You have a funny choice of words mister.

Political correctness = intellectual dishonesty.

I didn't word it that way for political correctness. I don't have a problem for calling people out on jerk behavior, as you have undoubtedly witnessed at this point. I do however see a problem with blaming people for being born into a particular race. It's a matter of examining actions rather than inherited attributes.

 

[SoAnyway]

Apple probably already backs crooked $Hilary anyway.

What this election cycle has taught me is that it doesn't matter if a politician has a D or an R next to their name, because the establishment and their backers will find a way to subvert democracy and coronate their candidate of choice.

 

[Bobby Corwen]

I didn't word it that way for political correctness. I don't have a problem for calling people out on jerk behavior, as you have undoubtedly witnessed at this point. I do however see a problem with blaming people for being born into a particular race. It's a matter of examining actions rather than inherited attributes.

I have never blamed anyone for being born into a particular race.

I have never once said anything racist. Point out what I said that is racist. Otherwise stop calling me that.

Im not racist I believe we are all equal and I believe we are all the same race, homo sapien, the human race.

Sure there are different ethnicities, but I grew up in the bay area in the 90s and all groups of people got along seamlessly and treated each other equally and respected each others unique cultures, even celebrated them and rewarded originality and being different. Back then it was a model for what the rest of the country could have become.

But instead now with Obama, racial tension is higher than ever. We are worse than where we started from.

Not only am I not racist, I am a prototype of what equality and tolerance could be in a real and modern way. I am quick to point out anti-white "reverse racism" because I know what the solution to racial tension feels like, and it doesnt involve being racist towards whites or trying to erase our identity.

I am multicultural in the true sense of the word --before it became a basterdized term used as a weapon against white people by liberal cucks.

 

[Judo]

American politics has become so bizarre. A lot of Americans seem to get so hung up on these useless buzzwords with out putting any reasoned thought in to what they are saying, or even listening to. What's up with that?

 

[carrrrrlos]

Paying off China doesn’t seem to be working so why bother with the GOP?

 

[Renzatic]

The picture, the stats, and reality itself is true. I grew up in Oakland in the 90s.

Weather you choose to believe it or not.

Okay, then explain this to me. The picture cites Bureau of Justice stats. I linked to the Bureau of Justice papers directly. It states otherwise. So you now choose to refute the source in lieu of the more comfortable notion presented to you by your little picture, despite all evidence to the contrary.

So if you're unable to accept an obvious truth because it runs counter to your personally held beliefs, can you actually say you're an "alpha", one of the strong people you so obviously and desperately project yourself as being?

You know, I don't think I've ever seen anyone parade their insecurities so nakedly in front of everyone before.

 

[Prof.]

Why don't any conservatives have any socially influential technology empires and entertainment monopolies?

Because they're not smart enough.

 

[Bobby Corwen]

Okay, then explain this to me. The picture cites Bureau of Justice stats. I linked to the Bureau of Justice papers directly. It states otherwise. So you now choose to refute the source in lieu of the more comfortable notion presented to you by your little picture, despite all evidence to the contrary.

So if you're unable to accept an obvious truth because it runs counter to your personally held beliefs, can you actually say you're an "alpha", one of the strong people you so obviously and desperately project yourself as being?

You know, I don't think I've ever seen anyone parade their insecurities so nakedly in front of everyone before.

Which bureau of justice stats readout?

What sub-category?

What years?

All you did was link a printout of various statistics that neither denied or even covered the topic of black on white crime which my info graphic singled out and extracted from various data.

Speak plainly in a sentence that explains exactly in which section Im supposed to look at and where is says those statistics are wrong.

I don't really understand your point, please reiterate in a way I can understand simply. what point are you making here? That the stats may be exaggerated? Surely you're not trying to say black on white crime doesnt exist?

Also didn't the bureau stop reporting certain race statistics after a certain year because it got too bad and made people look bad? Or am I thinking of something else...

 

[Renzatic]

All you did was link a printout of various statistics that neither denied or even covered the topic of black on white crime which my info graphic singled out and extracted from various data.

Speak plainly in a sentence that explains exactly in which section Im supposed to look at and where is says those statistics are wrong.

Just read the goddamn things. I gave you a summary of what each link I provided entails. I'm not going to hold your hand, and help you pronounce the big words.

 

[doelcm82]

Apparently you missed the countless advances in military technology that have been made since then...

I mean seriously, what are you going to do against a cruise missile? Or even a mortar shell?

There are those who have stood up with weapons against what they see as U.S. government tyranny since the Revolutionary War. Most have died in the attempt, or soon afterward, but a few have caused some damage

Examples:

John Wilkes Booth
Timothy McVeigh
Eric Rudolph

 

[Bobby Corwen]

Just read the goddamn things. I gave you a summary of what each link I provided entails. I'm not going to hold your hand, and help you pronounce the big words.

Its a cluster**** of random irrelevant information lol

I don't even think you have a real point, just threw those documents out there and hope they stick or prove something? lmao

 

[Judo]

Bobby, if you have to state that you are or aren't something in such basic terms, e.g. "I'm not racist", that usually means there is a good case that you are acting the opposite of what you are saying.